不同种族肾移植受者肾小球滤过率估算方程的性能:一项回顾性队列研究。

Pooja Budhiraja, Richard Butterfield, Musab Hommos, Raymond L Heilman, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Salah Alajous, Hay Me Me, Harini A Chakkera, Rebecca L Corey, Bassam G Abu Jawdeh, Hassan A Khamash
{"title":"不同种族肾移植受者肾小球滤过率估算方程的性能:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Pooja Budhiraja, Richard Butterfield, Musab Hommos, Raymond L Heilman, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Salah Alajous, Hay Me Me, Harini A Chakkera, Rebecca L Corey, Bassam G Abu Jawdeh, Hassan A Khamash","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.12.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed the accuracy of different GFR estimating equations in kidney transplant recipients across diverse racial backgrounds, addressing the previously identified validation gap in multiethnic populations predominantly studied in White cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center study, eGFR was compared to the measured GFR (mGFR) one year following kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 1-year eGFR and mGFR data from 1145 participants (54% Whites, 23% Hispanics, 9% Blacks, 7% Native Americans, and 6% Asians) revealed varied correlations across racial groups. For Whites, the combined 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C formulas demonstrated a stronger correlation (r = 0.72, [0.65, 0.78]) compared to the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine and EKFC cystatin C equation. This equation also achieved the highest accuracy (P30: 77.1%). In Black recipients, both the 2009 CKD-EPI (r = 0.56 [0.42, 0.68]) and the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine (r = 0.56 [0.41, 0.68]) exhibited modest correlations. The 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation showed improved correlation (r = 0.63 (0.43, 0.77)] and an accuracy of 62.7% (P30), which was slightly lower than the EKFC cystatin C equation (P30: 64.7%). However, neither the EKFC (rescaled) cystatin C nor the race-free kidney-specific equations outperformed existing eGFR equations for Black participants In Hispanic patients, combined creatinine-cystatin C equations outperformed creatinine-only equations. Among Native Americans, the combined creatinine-cystatin, EKFC (rescaled) cystatin C, and race-free kidney-specific equations achieved an accuracy rate exceeding 85%. In Asians, the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation showed the highest correlation, while the race-free kidney-specific equation had the most accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that creatinine-cystatin C combined equations outperformed single-marker formulas across all racial groups, with negligible differences between the 2009 CKD EPI and the race-neutral 2021 CKD-EPI version.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equations in Kidney Transplant Recipients of Various Races: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Budhiraja, Richard Butterfield, Musab Hommos, Raymond L Heilman, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Salah Alajous, Hay Me Me, Harini A Chakkera, Rebecca L Corey, Bassam G Abu Jawdeh, Hassan A Khamash\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.12.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed the accuracy of different GFR estimating equations in kidney transplant recipients across diverse racial backgrounds, addressing the previously identified validation gap in multiethnic populations predominantly studied in White cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center study, eGFR was compared to the measured GFR (mGFR) one year following kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 1-year eGFR and mGFR data from 1145 participants (54% Whites, 23% Hispanics, 9% Blacks, 7% Native Americans, and 6% Asians) revealed varied correlations across racial groups. For Whites, the combined 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C formulas demonstrated a stronger correlation (r = 0.72, [0.65, 0.78]) compared to the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine and EKFC cystatin C equation. This equation also achieved the highest accuracy (P30: 77.1%). In Black recipients, both the 2009 CKD-EPI (r = 0.56 [0.42, 0.68]) and the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine (r = 0.56 [0.41, 0.68]) exhibited modest correlations. The 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation showed improved correlation (r = 0.63 (0.43, 0.77)] and an accuracy of 62.7% (P30), which was slightly lower than the EKFC cystatin C equation (P30: 64.7%). However, neither the EKFC (rescaled) cystatin C nor the race-free kidney-specific equations outperformed existing eGFR equations for Black participants In Hispanic patients, combined creatinine-cystatin C equations outperformed creatinine-only equations. Among Native Americans, the combined creatinine-cystatin, EKFC (rescaled) cystatin C, and race-free kidney-specific equations achieved an accuracy rate exceeding 85%. In Asians, the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation showed the highest correlation, while the race-free kidney-specific equation had the most accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that creatinine-cystatin C combined equations outperformed single-marker formulas across all racial groups, with negligible differences between the 2009 CKD EPI and the race-neutral 2021 CKD-EPI version.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.12.026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.12.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们评估了不同种族背景的肾移植受者不同GFR估计方程的准确性,解决了先前在以白人队列为主的多种族人群中发现的验证差距。方法:在这项单中心研究中,将eGFR与肾移植后一年测量的GFR (mGFR)进行比较。结果:1145名参与者(白人54%,西班牙裔23%,黑人9%,美洲原住民7%,亚洲人6%)的1年eGFR和mGFR数据显示了不同种族群体之间的不同相关性。对于white来说,与2021 CKD-EPI肌酐和EKFC胱抑素C方程相比,2021 CKD-EPI肌酐-胱抑素C联合公式显示出更强的相关性(r = 0.72,[0.65, 0.78])。该方程也达到了最高的精度(P30: 77.1%)。在黑人患者中,2009年CKD-EPI (r = 0.56[0.42, 0.68])和2021年CKD-EPI肌酐(r = 0.56[0.41, 0.68])均表现出适度的相关性。2021 CKD-EPI肌酐-胱抑素C方程相关性提高(r = 0.63(0.43, 0.77)),准确性为62.7% (P30),略低于EKFC胱抑素C方程(P30: 64.7%)。然而,对于黑人参与者,无论是EKFC(重新调整的)胱抑素C还是无种族的肾脏特异性方程都没有优于现有的eGFR方程。在西班牙裔患者中,联合肌酸酐-胱抑素C方程优于仅肌酸酐方程。在美洲原住民中,联合肌酐-胱抑素、EKFC(重新标度)胱抑素C和无种族肾特异性方程的准确率超过85%。在亚洲人中,CKD-EPI肌酐-胱抑素C方程显示出最高的相关性,而无种族肾脏特异性方程具有最高的准确性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,肌酐-胱抑素C联合公式在所有种族群体中都优于单一标记公式,2009年CKD EPI和2021年CKD-EPI版本之间的差异可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equations in Kidney Transplant Recipients of Various Races: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: We assessed the accuracy of different GFR estimating equations in kidney transplant recipients across diverse racial backgrounds, addressing the previously identified validation gap in multiethnic populations predominantly studied in White cohorts.

Methods: In this single-center study, eGFR was compared to the measured GFR (mGFR) one year following kidney transplantation.

Results: The 1-year eGFR and mGFR data from 1145 participants (54% Whites, 23% Hispanics, 9% Blacks, 7% Native Americans, and 6% Asians) revealed varied correlations across racial groups. For Whites, the combined 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C formulas demonstrated a stronger correlation (r = 0.72, [0.65, 0.78]) compared to the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine and EKFC cystatin C equation. This equation also achieved the highest accuracy (P30: 77.1%). In Black recipients, both the 2009 CKD-EPI (r = 0.56 [0.42, 0.68]) and the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine (r = 0.56 [0.41, 0.68]) exhibited modest correlations. The 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation showed improved correlation (r = 0.63 (0.43, 0.77)] and an accuracy of 62.7% (P30), which was slightly lower than the EKFC cystatin C equation (P30: 64.7%). However, neither the EKFC (rescaled) cystatin C nor the race-free kidney-specific equations outperformed existing eGFR equations for Black participants In Hispanic patients, combined creatinine-cystatin C equations outperformed creatinine-only equations. Among Native Americans, the combined creatinine-cystatin, EKFC (rescaled) cystatin C, and race-free kidney-specific equations achieved an accuracy rate exceeding 85%. In Asians, the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation showed the highest correlation, while the race-free kidney-specific equation had the most accuracy.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that creatinine-cystatin C combined equations outperformed single-marker formulas across all racial groups, with negligible differences between the 2009 CKD EPI and the race-neutral 2021 CKD-EPI version.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信