用杜匹单抗治疗皮肤免疫相关不良事件的免疫治疗受者的长期死亡率结果

Sara Khattab, Guihong Wan, Suzanne Xu, Cameron Moseley, Matthew Tran, Emma Beagles, Chuck Lin, Bonnie Leung, Marjan Azin, Ninghui Hao, Kerry L Reynolds, Shadmehr Demehri, Nicole R LeBoeuf, Yevgeniy R Semenov
{"title":"用杜匹单抗治疗皮肤免疫相关不良事件的免疫治疗受者的长期死亡率结果","authors":"Sara Khattab, Guihong Wan, Suzanne Xu, Cameron Moseley, Matthew Tran, Emma Beagles, Chuck Lin, Bonnie Leung, Marjan Azin, Ninghui Hao, Kerry L Reynolds, Shadmehr Demehri, Nicole R LeBoeuf, Yevgeniy R Semenov","doi":"10.1101/2025.01.07.25320156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dupilumab has been added to National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN) guidelines as a therapeutic strategy for managing certain cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, little is known about the implications of dupilumab for cancer outcomes in this population. In this multi-institutional study, we evaluate the impact of dupilumab treatment on survival among ICI recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a muti-institutional retrospective cohort study of ICI recipients from the Mass General Brigham Healthcare System and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. The dupilumab group was compared to two control groups who did not receive dupilumab: with and without cirAEs (control groups 1 and 2, respectively) that were 1:2 matched on sex, race, age at ICI initiation, Charlson Comorbidity Score, year of ICI initiation, and ICI type. Manual chart review was performed to obtain cirAE characteristics, systemic glucocorticoid use, dupilumab treatment, vital status, and last contact date. Time-varying multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to evaluate the impact of dupilumab on overall survival, adjusted for sex, race, age at ICI initiation, ICI type, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, cancer type, cancer stage at ICI initiation, and systemic glucocorticoid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 cirAE patients treated with dupilumab were compared to two control groups of 106 patients each. Most patients receiving dupilumab demonstrated either complete or partial resolution of their cirAE (88.7%). In multivariable modeling, the overall survival of the dupilumab group was not significantly different from control group 1 (HR=0.74, 95% CI:0.35-1.60, p=0.5) or control group 2 (HR=0.70, 95% CI:0.32-1.51, p=0.4). However, the use of systemic glucocorticoids within two years after ICI initiation was associated with poorer overall survival when comparing the dupilumab group to control group 1 (HR=2.03, 95% CI:1.04-3.96, p=0.039) and control group 2 (HR=2.21, 95% CI:1.25-3.91, p=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that dupilumab is an effective therapeutic option for recalcitrant cirAEs and does not adversely impact mortality. Due to the observed detrimental effects of systemic glucocorticoid therapy, this study supports the need to shift away from systemic glucocorticoid immunosuppression and towards targeted immune modulators for irAE management that are less detrimental to ICI response.</p><p><strong>• what is already known on this topic: </strong>Current guidelines recommend the use of dupilumab in the treatment of certain moderate to severe cutaneous immune related adverse events (cirAE) and systemic glucocorticoids for others. Previous studies have shown dupilumab to be effective for steroid refractory cirAEs; <sup>1</sup> however, the impact dupilumab on survival outcomes among recipients of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) remains under studied.</p><p><strong>• what this study adds: </strong>This study concludes that dupilumab is an effective modality to treat cirAEs, with 88.7% of patients responding to treatment. Additionally, this study demonstrates a 206-day average delay from cirAE onset to dupilumab treatment suggesting the need for more timely consideration of this therapeutic option. Finally, our results demonstrated that dupilumab does not increase mortality among ICI recipients.</p><p><strong>• how this study might affect research practice or policy: </strong>The results of this study suggest that use of dupilumab in the treatment of cirAEs is effective and does not adversely impact mortality in the cancer population. Based on these findings, clinicians should consider dupilumab treatment for cirAEs in the appropriate clinical setting. Moreover, this study provides further evidence for the use of targeted immune modulators as preferred over more commonly utilized broad-based glucocorticoid immunosuppression for the management of immune related adverse events in the setting of ICI therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term mortality outcomes among immunotherapy recipients treated with dupilumab for the management of cutaneous immune-related adverse events.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Khattab, Guihong Wan, Suzanne Xu, Cameron Moseley, Matthew Tran, Emma Beagles, Chuck Lin, Bonnie Leung, Marjan Azin, Ninghui Hao, Kerry L Reynolds, Shadmehr Demehri, Nicole R LeBoeuf, Yevgeniy R Semenov\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2025.01.07.25320156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dupilumab has been added to National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN) guidelines as a therapeutic strategy for managing certain cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, little is known about the implications of dupilumab for cancer outcomes in this population. In this multi-institutional study, we evaluate the impact of dupilumab treatment on survival among ICI recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a muti-institutional retrospective cohort study of ICI recipients from the Mass General Brigham Healthcare System and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. The dupilumab group was compared to two control groups who did not receive dupilumab: with and without cirAEs (control groups 1 and 2, respectively) that were 1:2 matched on sex, race, age at ICI initiation, Charlson Comorbidity Score, year of ICI initiation, and ICI type. Manual chart review was performed to obtain cirAE characteristics, systemic glucocorticoid use, dupilumab treatment, vital status, and last contact date. Time-varying multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to evaluate the impact of dupilumab on overall survival, adjusted for sex, race, age at ICI initiation, ICI type, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, cancer type, cancer stage at ICI initiation, and systemic glucocorticoid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 cirAE patients treated with dupilumab were compared to two control groups of 106 patients each. Most patients receiving dupilumab demonstrated either complete or partial resolution of their cirAE (88.7%). In multivariable modeling, the overall survival of the dupilumab group was not significantly different from control group 1 (HR=0.74, 95% CI:0.35-1.60, p=0.5) or control group 2 (HR=0.70, 95% CI:0.32-1.51, p=0.4). However, the use of systemic glucocorticoids within two years after ICI initiation was associated with poorer overall survival when comparing the dupilumab group to control group 1 (HR=2.03, 95% CI:1.04-3.96, p=0.039) and control group 2 (HR=2.21, 95% CI:1.25-3.91, p=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that dupilumab is an effective therapeutic option for recalcitrant cirAEs and does not adversely impact mortality. Due to the observed detrimental effects of systemic glucocorticoid therapy, this study supports the need to shift away from systemic glucocorticoid immunosuppression and towards targeted immune modulators for irAE management that are less detrimental to ICI response.</p><p><strong>• what is already known on this topic: </strong>Current guidelines recommend the use of dupilumab in the treatment of certain moderate to severe cutaneous immune related adverse events (cirAE) and systemic glucocorticoids for others. Previous studies have shown dupilumab to be effective for steroid refractory cirAEs; <sup>1</sup> however, the impact dupilumab on survival outcomes among recipients of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) remains under studied.</p><p><strong>• what this study adds: </strong>This study concludes that dupilumab is an effective modality to treat cirAEs, with 88.7% of patients responding to treatment. Additionally, this study demonstrates a 206-day average delay from cirAE onset to dupilumab treatment suggesting the need for more timely consideration of this therapeutic option. Finally, our results demonstrated that dupilumab does not increase mortality among ICI recipients.</p><p><strong>• how this study might affect research practice or policy: </strong>The results of this study suggest that use of dupilumab in the treatment of cirAEs is effective and does not adversely impact mortality in the cancer population. Based on these findings, clinicians should consider dupilumab treatment for cirAEs in the appropriate clinical setting. Moreover, this study provides further evidence for the use of targeted immune modulators as preferred over more commonly utilized broad-based glucocorticoid immunosuppression for the management of immune related adverse events in the setting of ICI therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741467/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.07.25320156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.07.25320156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Dupilumab已被添加到国家癌症综合网络(NCCN)指南中,作为处理免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗中某些皮肤免疫相关不良事件(cirae)的治疗策略。然而,对于dupilumab对该人群癌症预后的影响知之甚少。在这项多机构研究中,我们评估了dupilumab治疗对ICI受者生存的影响。方法:我们对来自麻省总医院布里格姆医疗系统和丹娜-法伯癌症研究所的ICI受者进行了一项多机构回顾性队列研究。将dupilumab组与未接受dupilumab的两个对照组进行比较:有和没有cirAEs(分别为对照组1和对照组2),在性别、种族、ICI开始时的年龄、Charlson合并症评分、ICI开始的年份和ICI类型上为1:2匹配。进行手工图表回顾以获得cirAE特征、全身糖皮质激素使用、杜匹单抗治疗、生命状态和最后一次接触日期。使用时变多变量Cox比例风险回归来评估dupilumab对总生存率的影响,并根据性别、种族、ICI开始时的年龄、ICI类型、Charlson合并症指数评分、癌症类型、ICI开始时的癌症分期和全身糖皮质激素使用进行调整。结果:接受dupilumab治疗的cirAE患者共53例,对照组各106例。大多数接受dupilumab治疗的患者表现出cirAE的完全或部分缓解(88.7%)。在多变量模型中,dupilumab组的总生存率与对照组1 (HR=0.74, 95% CI:0.35-1.60, p=0.5)或对照组2 (HR=0.70, 95% CI:0.32-1.51, p=0.4)无显著差异。然而,与对照1组(HR=2.03, 95% CI:1.04-3.96, p=0.039)和对照2组(HR=2.21, 95% CI:1.25-3.91, p=0.006)相比,在ICI开始后两年内使用全体性糖皮质激素与较差的总生存率相关。结论:本研究表明,dupilumab是难治性cirae的有效治疗选择,不会对死亡率产生不良影响。由于观察到全身糖皮质激素治疗的有害影响,本研究支持需要从全身糖皮质激素免疫抑制转向对ICI反应危害较小的靶向免疫调节剂进行irAE管理。•关于该主题的已知情况:目前的指南建议使用dupilumab治疗某些中度至重度皮肤免疫相关不良事件(cirAE)和其他系统性糖皮质激素。先前的研究表明,dupilumab对类固醇难治性cirae有效;然而,dupilumab对免疫检查点抑制剂治疗(ICI)接受者生存结局的影响仍在研究中。•本研究补充:本研究得出结论,dupilumab是治疗cirae的有效方式,88.7%的患者对治疗有反应。此外,该研究显示cirAE发病到dupilumab治疗平均延迟206天,这表明需要更及时地考虑这种治疗选择。最后,我们的结果表明dupilumab不会增加ICI受者的死亡率。•本研究如何影响研究实践或政策:本研究的结果表明,在cirae治疗中使用dupilumab是有效的,并且不会对癌症人群的死亡率产生不利影响。基于这些发现,临床医生应考虑在适当的临床环境中使用dupilumab治疗cirae。此外,本研究提供了进一步的证据,证明在ICI治疗中,靶向免疫调节剂比更常用的广泛的糖皮质激素免疫抑制更适合用于免疫相关不良事件的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term mortality outcomes among immunotherapy recipients treated with dupilumab for the management of cutaneous immune-related adverse events.

Background: Dupilumab has been added to National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN) guidelines as a therapeutic strategy for managing certain cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. However, little is known about the implications of dupilumab for cancer outcomes in this population. In this multi-institutional study, we evaluate the impact of dupilumab treatment on survival among ICI recipients.

Methods: We conducted a muti-institutional retrospective cohort study of ICI recipients from the Mass General Brigham Healthcare System and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. The dupilumab group was compared to two control groups who did not receive dupilumab: with and without cirAEs (control groups 1 and 2, respectively) that were 1:2 matched on sex, race, age at ICI initiation, Charlson Comorbidity Score, year of ICI initiation, and ICI type. Manual chart review was performed to obtain cirAE characteristics, systemic glucocorticoid use, dupilumab treatment, vital status, and last contact date. Time-varying multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to evaluate the impact of dupilumab on overall survival, adjusted for sex, race, age at ICI initiation, ICI type, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, cancer type, cancer stage at ICI initiation, and systemic glucocorticoid use.

Results: A total of 53 cirAE patients treated with dupilumab were compared to two control groups of 106 patients each. Most patients receiving dupilumab demonstrated either complete or partial resolution of their cirAE (88.7%). In multivariable modeling, the overall survival of the dupilumab group was not significantly different from control group 1 (HR=0.74, 95% CI:0.35-1.60, p=0.5) or control group 2 (HR=0.70, 95% CI:0.32-1.51, p=0.4). However, the use of systemic glucocorticoids within two years after ICI initiation was associated with poorer overall survival when comparing the dupilumab group to control group 1 (HR=2.03, 95% CI:1.04-3.96, p=0.039) and control group 2 (HR=2.21, 95% CI:1.25-3.91, p=0.006).

Conclusions: This study suggests that dupilumab is an effective therapeutic option for recalcitrant cirAEs and does not adversely impact mortality. Due to the observed detrimental effects of systemic glucocorticoid therapy, this study supports the need to shift away from systemic glucocorticoid immunosuppression and towards targeted immune modulators for irAE management that are less detrimental to ICI response.

• what is already known on this topic: Current guidelines recommend the use of dupilumab in the treatment of certain moderate to severe cutaneous immune related adverse events (cirAE) and systemic glucocorticoids for others. Previous studies have shown dupilumab to be effective for steroid refractory cirAEs; 1 however, the impact dupilumab on survival outcomes among recipients of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) remains under studied.

• what this study adds: This study concludes that dupilumab is an effective modality to treat cirAEs, with 88.7% of patients responding to treatment. Additionally, this study demonstrates a 206-day average delay from cirAE onset to dupilumab treatment suggesting the need for more timely consideration of this therapeutic option. Finally, our results demonstrated that dupilumab does not increase mortality among ICI recipients.

• how this study might affect research practice or policy: The results of this study suggest that use of dupilumab in the treatment of cirAEs is effective and does not adversely impact mortality in the cancer population. Based on these findings, clinicians should consider dupilumab treatment for cirAEs in the appropriate clinical setting. Moreover, this study provides further evidence for the use of targeted immune modulators as preferred over more commonly utilized broad-based glucocorticoid immunosuppression for the management of immune related adverse events in the setting of ICI therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信