国际丧亲护理模式的系统回顾和实施障碍和促进因素。

Omega Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1177/00302228251315502
Nicci Bartley, Luna Rodriguez Grieve, Claire Cooper, Laura Kirsten, Cindy Wilson, Betsy Sajish, Joanne Shaw
{"title":"国际丧亲护理模式的系统回顾和实施障碍和促进因素。","authors":"Nicci Bartley, Luna Rodriguez Grieve, Claire Cooper, Laura Kirsten, Cindy Wilson, Betsy Sajish, Joanne Shaw","doi":"10.1177/00302228251315502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bereavement care can facilitate adjustment to death and reduce immediate distress and long-term morbidity, mortality and health service utilisation. This systematic review aimed to identify international models of bereavement care, and barriers and facilitators to implementing such models. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO identified 64 studies for inclusion. The most common forms of bereavement support were bereavement packs, memory-making activities, condolence cards, memorial services, and follow-up contact. Only 14 models included a formal assessment of complex grief, and 17 studies considered culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Barriers included lack of institutional/financial support, staff discomfort delivering care, lack of dedicated staffing, and difficulty collecting/maintaining information. Facilitators were adequate funding/infrastructure, formal protocols/procedures, dedicated staffing, and staff training and support. Future research should address bereavement models of care in settings beyond palliative care, considering culturally and linguistically diverse populations, and should provide implementation data and strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"302228251315502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of International Bereavement Models of Care and Implementation Barriers and Facilitators.\",\"authors\":\"Nicci Bartley, Luna Rodriguez Grieve, Claire Cooper, Laura Kirsten, Cindy Wilson, Betsy Sajish, Joanne Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00302228251315502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bereavement care can facilitate adjustment to death and reduce immediate distress and long-term morbidity, mortality and health service utilisation. This systematic review aimed to identify international models of bereavement care, and barriers and facilitators to implementing such models. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO identified 64 studies for inclusion. The most common forms of bereavement support were bereavement packs, memory-making activities, condolence cards, memorial services, and follow-up contact. Only 14 models included a formal assessment of complex grief, and 17 studies considered culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Barriers included lack of institutional/financial support, staff discomfort delivering care, lack of dedicated staffing, and difficulty collecting/maintaining information. Facilitators were adequate funding/infrastructure, formal protocols/procedures, dedicated staffing, and staff training and support. Future research should address bereavement models of care in settings beyond palliative care, considering culturally and linguistically diverse populations, and should provide implementation data and strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"302228251315502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228251315502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228251315502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

丧亲护理可以促进对死亡的适应,减少眼前的痛苦和长期发病率、死亡率和保健服务的利用。本系统综述旨在确定丧亲护理的国际模式,以及实施这些模式的障碍和促进因素。系统检索MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL和PsycINFO确定了64项研究纳入。最常见的丧亲支持形式是丧亲包、纪念活动、吊唁卡、追悼会和后续联系。只有14个模型包含了对复杂悲伤的正式评估,17个研究考虑了文化和语言不同的人群。障碍包括缺乏机构/财政支持,工作人员在提供护理时感到不适,缺乏专门的人员配置,以及难以收集/维护信息。促进因素包括充足的资金/基础设施、正式的协议/程序、专门的人员配备以及员工培训和支持。未来的研究应该在姑息治疗之外的环境中探讨丧亲模式,考虑文化和语言不同的人群,并应提供实施数据和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review of International Bereavement Models of Care and Implementation Barriers and Facilitators.

Bereavement care can facilitate adjustment to death and reduce immediate distress and long-term morbidity, mortality and health service utilisation. This systematic review aimed to identify international models of bereavement care, and barriers and facilitators to implementing such models. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO identified 64 studies for inclusion. The most common forms of bereavement support were bereavement packs, memory-making activities, condolence cards, memorial services, and follow-up contact. Only 14 models included a formal assessment of complex grief, and 17 studies considered culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Barriers included lack of institutional/financial support, staff discomfort delivering care, lack of dedicated staffing, and difficulty collecting/maintaining information. Facilitators were adequate funding/infrastructure, formal protocols/procedures, dedicated staffing, and staff training and support. Future research should address bereavement models of care in settings beyond palliative care, considering culturally and linguistically diverse populations, and should provide implementation data and strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信