外骨骼训练治疗脊髓损伤神经性疼痛(ExSCIP): 2期可行性随机试验方案

HRB open research Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13949.1
Conor White, Orlaith Doherty, Eimear Smith, Catherine Blake, Nanna Brix Finnerup, Nathan Kirwan, Mark Pollock, Olive Lennon
{"title":"外骨骼训练治疗脊髓损伤神经性疼痛(ExSCIP): 2期可行性随机试验方案","authors":"Conor White, Orlaith Doherty, Eimear Smith, Catherine Blake, Nanna Brix Finnerup, Nathan Kirwan, Mark Pollock, Olive Lennon","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13949.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), 53% of people develop neuropathic pain (NP). NP can be more debilitating than other consequences of SCI, and a persistent health issue. Pharmacotherapies are commonly recommended for NP management in SCI, although severe pain often remains refractory to these treatments in many sufferers. Furthermore, poor medication adherence exists, stemming from unacceptable side-effects and fear of dependency.Sensorimotor stimulation using active walking with robotic assistance has not been well studied in NP after SCI, despite convincing locomotor-based pre-clinical studies, identifying prevention and reversal of NP.Our primary aim is to assess the impact of exoskeleton-based walking on NP intensity and interference after SCI and examine feasibility outcomes for progression to a definitive trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a phase 2 single-blinded, randomised feasibility study. It will test the feasibility and acceptability of exoskeleton-based walking 3 times per week for 12 weeks (intervention), as a mechanistic-based intervention for NP after SCI. The comparator will be an equally dosed, blended relaxation programme devoid of motor imagery prompts. 40 participants with moderate-to-severe NP post SCI will be recruited and randomised to intervention and comparator groups.The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes for progression to definitive trial which include recruitment and retention rates, adverse events and acceptability of the intervention.Secondary outcomes explore changes in NP intensity and interference as measured by the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set 3.0 (ISCIPBDS) at baseline, post-intervention (week 13) and at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a need to explore non-pharmacological management of NP after SCI. The findings of this feasibility trial will inform the development of a future multicentre, international RCT.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT06463418, 08/07/2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06463418.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"7 ","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exoskeleton Training for Spinal Cord Injury Neuropathic Pain (ExSCIP): Protocol for a Phase 2 Feasibility Randomised Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Conor White, Orlaith Doherty, Eimear Smith, Catherine Blake, Nanna Brix Finnerup, Nathan Kirwan, Mark Pollock, Olive Lennon\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.13949.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), 53% of people develop neuropathic pain (NP). NP can be more debilitating than other consequences of SCI, and a persistent health issue. Pharmacotherapies are commonly recommended for NP management in SCI, although severe pain often remains refractory to these treatments in many sufferers. Furthermore, poor medication adherence exists, stemming from unacceptable side-effects and fear of dependency.Sensorimotor stimulation using active walking with robotic assistance has not been well studied in NP after SCI, despite convincing locomotor-based pre-clinical studies, identifying prevention and reversal of NP.Our primary aim is to assess the impact of exoskeleton-based walking on NP intensity and interference after SCI and examine feasibility outcomes for progression to a definitive trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a phase 2 single-blinded, randomised feasibility study. It will test the feasibility and acceptability of exoskeleton-based walking 3 times per week for 12 weeks (intervention), as a mechanistic-based intervention for NP after SCI. The comparator will be an equally dosed, blended relaxation programme devoid of motor imagery prompts. 40 participants with moderate-to-severe NP post SCI will be recruited and randomised to intervention and comparator groups.The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes for progression to definitive trial which include recruitment and retention rates, adverse events and acceptability of the intervention.Secondary outcomes explore changes in NP intensity and interference as measured by the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set 3.0 (ISCIPBDS) at baseline, post-intervention (week 13) and at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a need to explore non-pharmacological management of NP after SCI. The findings of this feasibility trial will inform the development of a future multicentre, international RCT.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT06463418, 08/07/2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06463418.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748425/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13949.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13949.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脊髓损伤(SCI)后,53%的人会出现神经性疼痛(NP)。NP可能比脊髓损伤的其他后果更使人衰弱,并且是一个持久的健康问题。药物治疗通常被推荐用于脊髓损伤的NP治疗,尽管这些治疗对许多患者的严重疼痛仍然难以治愈。此外,由于不可接受的副作用和对依赖的恐惧,药物依从性很差。尽管有令人信服的基于肢体运动的临床前研究,确定了NP的预防和逆转,但在脊髓损伤后NP中使用机器人辅助主动行走的感觉运动刺激尚未得到很好的研究。我们的主要目的是评估基于外骨骼的行走对脊髓损伤后NP强度和干扰的影响,并检查进展到最终试验的可行性结果。方法:这是一项2期单盲、随机可行性研究。本研究将测试外骨骼为基础的步行,每周3次,持续12周(干预),作为脊髓损伤后NP的机械干预的可行性和可接受性。比较品将是一个同等剂量的混合放松程序,没有运动意象提示。将招募40名中度至重度脊髓损伤后NP患者,随机分为干预组和对照组。主要结局是进展到最终试验的可行性结局,包括招募和保留率、不良事件和干预的可接受性。次要结局探讨了国际脊髓损伤疼痛基础数据集3.0 (ISCIPBDS)在基线、干预后(第13周)和6个月随访时NP强度和干扰的变化。结论:有必要探索脊髓损伤后NP的非药物治疗方法。这项可行性试验的结果将为未来多中心国际随机对照试验的发展提供信息。试验报名:NCT06463418, 08/07/2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06463418。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exoskeleton Training for Spinal Cord Injury Neuropathic Pain (ExSCIP): Protocol for a Phase 2 Feasibility Randomised Trial.

Background: Following Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), 53% of people develop neuropathic pain (NP). NP can be more debilitating than other consequences of SCI, and a persistent health issue. Pharmacotherapies are commonly recommended for NP management in SCI, although severe pain often remains refractory to these treatments in many sufferers. Furthermore, poor medication adherence exists, stemming from unacceptable side-effects and fear of dependency.Sensorimotor stimulation using active walking with robotic assistance has not been well studied in NP after SCI, despite convincing locomotor-based pre-clinical studies, identifying prevention and reversal of NP.Our primary aim is to assess the impact of exoskeleton-based walking on NP intensity and interference after SCI and examine feasibility outcomes for progression to a definitive trial.

Methods: This is a phase 2 single-blinded, randomised feasibility study. It will test the feasibility and acceptability of exoskeleton-based walking 3 times per week for 12 weeks (intervention), as a mechanistic-based intervention for NP after SCI. The comparator will be an equally dosed, blended relaxation programme devoid of motor imagery prompts. 40 participants with moderate-to-severe NP post SCI will be recruited and randomised to intervention and comparator groups.The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes for progression to definitive trial which include recruitment and retention rates, adverse events and acceptability of the intervention.Secondary outcomes explore changes in NP intensity and interference as measured by the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set 3.0 (ISCIPBDS) at baseline, post-intervention (week 13) and at 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions: There is a need to explore non-pharmacological management of NP after SCI. The findings of this feasibility trial will inform the development of a future multicentre, international RCT.

Trial registration: NCT06463418, 08/07/2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06463418.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信