生活方式教育课程作为严重哮喘患者生物给药的辅助：可行性研究。

PEC innovation Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100364

Joseph W. Lanario , Drew Davies , Lucy Cartwright , Michael E. Hyland , Matthew Masoli

{"title":"生活方式教育课程作为严重哮喘患者生物给药的辅助：可行性研究。","authors":"Joseph W. Lanario , Drew Davies , Lucy Cartwright , Michael E. Hyland , Matthew Masoli","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the feasibility and acceptability of adapting a psychoeducation course (Body Reprogramming) for severe asthma and finding suggestions for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Severe asthma patients were recruited from a single centre and enrolled in an online group-based course. Each course consisted of four sessions: introduction to BR, stress, exercise, and diet. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires assessing HRQoL, mood, asthma and extra-pulmonary symptoms, pre/post course. Those who attended two or more sessions were invited to provide feedback in interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-eight participants took part in one of the five courses. Thirteen (46 %) attended all four sessions and were sent post-course questionnaires, eight participants (62 %) returned them. Twelve participants provided post course feedback, Themes included: The course as a time to reflect, Appreciation of the group-format, Impact of pre-existing knowledge on enjoyment of the course and Areas of improvement. Maintaining course size, clarification of the course aims and methods were identified as areas of improvement by participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An educational course focused on managing extra-pulmonary symptoms is feasible and of perceived benefit to patients with severe asthma.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>BR could be incorporated into a rehab programme for patients with severe asthma with significant extrapulmonary symptoms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A lifestyle educational course as an adjunct to biologic administration in patients with severe asthma: A feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"Joseph W. Lanario , Drew Davies , Lucy Cartwright , Michael E. Hyland , Matthew Masoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the feasibility and acceptability of adapting a psychoeducation course (Body Reprogramming) for severe asthma and finding suggestions for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Severe asthma patients were recruited from a single centre and enrolled in an online group-based course. Each course consisted of four sessions: introduction to BR, stress, exercise, and diet. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires assessing HRQoL, mood, asthma and extra-pulmonary symptoms, pre/post course. Those who attended two or more sessions were invited to provide feedback in interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-eight participants took part in one of the five courses. Thirteen (46 %) attended all four sessions and were sent post-course questionnaires, eight participants (62 %) returned them. Twelve participants provided post course feedback, Themes included: The course as a time to reflect, Appreciation of the group-format, Impact of pre-existing knowledge on enjoyment of the course and Areas of improvement. Maintaining course size, clarification of the course aims and methods were identified as areas of improvement by participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An educational course focused on managing extra-pulmonary symptoms is feasible and of perceived benefit to patients with severe asthma.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>BR could be incorporated into a rehab programme for patients with severe asthma with significant extrapulmonary symptoms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PEC innovation\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PEC innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224001122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224001122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：探讨重症哮喘患者采用“身体重编程”心理教育课程的可行性和可接受性，并提出改进建议。方法：从单一中心招募严重哮喘患者，并参加在线小组课程。每门课程包括四个部分：BR介绍、压力、运动和饮食。参与者被要求完成评估HRQoL、情绪、哮喘和肺外症状、疗程前后的问卷调查。那些参加了两次或两次以上会议的人被邀请在采访中提供反馈。结果：28名参与者参加了5个课程中的一个。13名参与者（46%）参加了所有四次课程，并发送了课程后问卷，8名参与者（62%）返回了问卷。12位参与者提供了课程后的反馈，主题包括：课程作为反思的时间、对小组形式的欣赏、已有知识对课程享受的影响以及需要改进的地方。保持课程规模，澄清课程目标和方法被参与者确定为改进的领域。结论：对严重哮喘患者开展以管理肺外症状为重点的教育课程是可行的，并且可被认为有益。创新：BR可纳入有明显肺外症状的严重哮喘患者的康复方案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A lifestyle educational course as an adjunct to biologic administration in patients with severe asthma: A feasibility study

Objective

To assess the feasibility and acceptability of adapting a psychoeducation course (Body Reprogramming) for severe asthma and finding suggestions for improvement.

Methods

Severe asthma patients were recruited from a single centre and enrolled in an online group-based course. Each course consisted of four sessions: introduction to BR, stress, exercise, and diet. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires assessing HRQoL, mood, asthma and extra-pulmonary symptoms, pre/post course. Those who attended two or more sessions were invited to provide feedback in interviews.

Results

Twenty-eight participants took part in one of the five courses. Thirteen (46 %) attended all four sessions and were sent post-course questionnaires, eight participants (62 %) returned them. Twelve participants provided post course feedback, Themes included: The course as a time to reflect, Appreciation of the group-format, Impact of pre-existing knowledge on enjoyment of the course and Areas of improvement. Maintaining course size, clarification of the course aims and methods were identified as areas of improvement by participants.