认知康复在改善抑郁症患者症状和恢复认知功能方面的有效性:一项随机对照试验的最新meta分析

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Lijun Liu, Keqiang Wang, Dongmei Xu, Yuhong Wang, Xiaomei Xu, Qian Wang, Xinfu Wang
{"title":"认知康复在改善抑郁症患者症状和恢复认知功能方面的有效性:一项随机对照试验的最新meta分析","authors":"Lijun Liu, Keqiang Wang, Dongmei Xu, Yuhong Wang, Xiaomei Xu, Qian Wang, Xinfu Wang","doi":"10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with depression often experience cognitive impairments. Cognitive rehabilitation, as an adjunctive intervention, may help to improve symptoms and restore functions in these patients. This study explores the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation in improving symptoms and restoring cognitive functions in patients with depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following databases were systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs): PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Two reviewers independently screened the studies. The search was conducted from the inception of the databases to April 10, 2024. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs, confidence interval were calculated using RevMan v. 5.3 software, and heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 RCTs involving 700 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, there was no significant difference in the severity of depression after cognitive rehabilitation intervention, with a pooled SMD of -0.14 (95% CI: -0.32 to 0.05; <i>P</i> = .15; I<sup>2</sup>  = 30%). Among the 4 studies reporting attention-related data, cognitive rehabilitation significantly improved attention function in patients with depression compared with the control group, with an SMD of -0.63 (95% CI: -0.99 to -0.27; <i>P</i> < .001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). In 6 studies, data showed significant improvement in verbal learning ability in patients with depression after cognitive rehabilitation intervention, with an SMD of -0.33 (95% CI: -0.60 to -0.05; <i>P</i> = .02; I<sup>2</sup> = 48%). Executive function outcomes were reported in 6 studies, whereas working memory outcomes were reported in 7 studies, both before and after the intervention. No significant differences were observed between the groups, with SMDs of -0.45 (95% CI: -1.09 to 0.19; <i>P</i> = .17; I<sup>2</sup>  = 78%) in executive function and -0.38 (95% CI: -0.82 to 0.07; <i>P</i> = .10; I<sup>2</sup> = 67%) in working memory post-intervention. Subgroup analysis suggested that cognitive rehabilitation training had a close to statistically significant improvement effect on depression severity in European regions, whereas no significant impact was observed in other regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cognitive rehabilitation shows certain value in improving attention and verbal learning in patients with depression as an adjunctive treatment, but its effectiveness in improving depressive symptoms, executive function, and working memory remains inconclusive. Future large-sample RCTs are needed to further explore this aspect.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":"25 6","pages":"727-736"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Cognitive Rehabilitation in Improving Symptoms and Restoring Cognitive Functions in Patients with Depression: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Lijun Liu, Keqiang Wang, Dongmei Xu, Yuhong Wang, Xiaomei Xu, Qian Wang, Xinfu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with depression often experience cognitive impairments. Cognitive rehabilitation, as an adjunctive intervention, may help to improve symptoms and restore functions in these patients. This study explores the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation in improving symptoms and restoring cognitive functions in patients with depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following databases were systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs): PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Two reviewers independently screened the studies. The search was conducted from the inception of the databases to April 10, 2024. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs, confidence interval were calculated using RevMan v. 5.3 software, and heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 RCTs involving 700 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, there was no significant difference in the severity of depression after cognitive rehabilitation intervention, with a pooled SMD of -0.14 (95% CI: -0.32 to 0.05; <i>P</i> = .15; I<sup>2</sup>  = 30%). Among the 4 studies reporting attention-related data, cognitive rehabilitation significantly improved attention function in patients with depression compared with the control group, with an SMD of -0.63 (95% CI: -0.99 to -0.27; <i>P</i> < .001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). In 6 studies, data showed significant improvement in verbal learning ability in patients with depression after cognitive rehabilitation intervention, with an SMD of -0.33 (95% CI: -0.60 to -0.05; <i>P</i> = .02; I<sup>2</sup> = 48%). Executive function outcomes were reported in 6 studies, whereas working memory outcomes were reported in 7 studies, both before and after the intervention. No significant differences were observed between the groups, with SMDs of -0.45 (95% CI: -1.09 to 0.19; <i>P</i> = .17; I<sup>2</sup>  = 78%) in executive function and -0.38 (95% CI: -0.82 to 0.07; <i>P</i> = .10; I<sup>2</sup> = 67%) in working memory post-intervention. Subgroup analysis suggested that cognitive rehabilitation training had a close to statistically significant improvement effect on depression severity in European regions, whereas no significant impact was observed in other regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cognitive rehabilitation shows certain value in improving attention and verbal learning in patients with depression as an adjunctive treatment, but its effectiveness in improving depressive symptoms, executive function, and working memory remains inconclusive. Future large-sample RCTs are needed to further explore this aspect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alpha psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"25 6\",\"pages\":\"727-736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736863/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alpha psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:抑郁症患者常出现认知障碍。认知康复作为一种辅助干预,可能有助于改善这些患者的症状和恢复功能。本研究探讨认知康复在改善抑郁症患者症状和恢复认知功能方面的有效性。方法:系统检索以下数据库,检索相关随机对照试验(rct): PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials。两名审稿人独立筛选了这些研究。搜索从数据库建立到2024年4月10日。采用RevMan v. 5.3软件计算95% ci、置信区间的标准化平均差异(SMDs),采用Cochran’s Q检验和i2统计量评估异质性。结果:本荟萃分析共纳入14项随机对照试验,涉及700例患者。与对照组相比,认知康复干预后抑郁严重程度无显著差异,合并SMD为-0.14 (95% CI: -0.32 ~ 0.05;P = .15;i2 = 30%)。在报告注意相关数据的4项研究中,与对照组相比,认知康复显著改善了抑郁症患者的注意功能,SMD为-0.63 (95% CI: -0.99 ~ -0.27;P < .001;i2 = 0%)。在6项研究中,数据显示抑郁症患者接受认知康复干预后语言学习能力显著改善,SMD为-0.33 (95% CI: -0.60 ~ -0.05;p = .02;i2 = 48%)。干预前后,6项研究报告了执行功能的结果,而7项研究报告了工作记忆的结果。各组间无显著差异,smd为-0.45 (95% CI: -1.09 ~ 0.19;p = .17;I2 = 78%)和-0.38 (95% CI: -0.82至0.07;p = .10;I2 = 67%)。亚组分析表明,认知康复训练对欧洲地区抑郁症严重程度的改善效果接近统计学显著,而在其他地区无显著影响。结论:认知康复作为辅助治疗在改善抑郁症患者的注意力和语言学习方面有一定的价值,但在改善抑郁症状、执行功能和工作记忆方面的效果尚不明确。这方面需要未来的大样本随机对照试验进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Cognitive Rehabilitation in Improving Symptoms and Restoring Cognitive Functions in Patients with Depression: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Objective: Patients with depression often experience cognitive impairments. Cognitive rehabilitation, as an adjunctive intervention, may help to improve symptoms and restore functions in these patients. This study explores the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation in improving symptoms and restoring cognitive functions in patients with depression.

Methods: The following databases were systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs): PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Two reviewers independently screened the studies. The search was conducted from the inception of the databases to April 10, 2024. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs, confidence interval were calculated using RevMan v. 5.3 software, and heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the I 2 statistic.

Results: A total of 14 RCTs involving 700 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, there was no significant difference in the severity of depression after cognitive rehabilitation intervention, with a pooled SMD of -0.14 (95% CI: -0.32 to 0.05; P = .15; I2  = 30%). Among the 4 studies reporting attention-related data, cognitive rehabilitation significantly improved attention function in patients with depression compared with the control group, with an SMD of -0.63 (95% CI: -0.99 to -0.27; P < .001; I2 = 0%). In 6 studies, data showed significant improvement in verbal learning ability in patients with depression after cognitive rehabilitation intervention, with an SMD of -0.33 (95% CI: -0.60 to -0.05; P = .02; I2 = 48%). Executive function outcomes were reported in 6 studies, whereas working memory outcomes were reported in 7 studies, both before and after the intervention. No significant differences were observed between the groups, with SMDs of -0.45 (95% CI: -1.09 to 0.19; P = .17; I2  = 78%) in executive function and -0.38 (95% CI: -0.82 to 0.07; P = .10; I2 = 67%) in working memory post-intervention. Subgroup analysis suggested that cognitive rehabilitation training had a close to statistically significant improvement effect on depression severity in European regions, whereas no significant impact was observed in other regions.

Conclusion: Cognitive rehabilitation shows certain value in improving attention and verbal learning in patients with depression as an adjunctive treatment, but its effectiveness in improving depressive symptoms, executive function, and working memory remains inconclusive. Future large-sample RCTs are needed to further explore this aspect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信