{"title":"Epley动作中头部位置的准确角度与估计角度的比较效果:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Sanathorn Chowsilpa, Jakarin Chawachat, Nicha Hansudewechakul, Suwicha Kaewsiri Isaradisaikul, Charuk Hanprasertpong","doi":"10.1159/000543528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction The Epley maneuver is the recommended treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of the posterior semicircular canal (PC-BPPV). Traditionally, the angle of the patient's head in each position during the Epley maneuver is not monitored and subjectively estimated by physicians. As a result, deviations of head angles from the standard may affect the treatment result. This study aimed to compare the outcome of the Epley maneuver between the group of exact head angles and the group of subjectively estimated angles (traditional Epley maneuver). Methods A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Otolaryngology, Chiang Mai University Hospital. PC-BPPV patients were attached with the head angle measuring device and randomized into 2 groups: Group I - the exact angle group, physicians performed the Epley maneuver with accurate head angle in each step; and Group II - the estimated angle group, physicians performed the Epley maneuver by estimating the head angle (traditional Epley maneuver). The treatment outcomes were measured at 1 week in the aspects of negative Dix Hallpike results and severity of dizziness. Results Thirty-one PC-BPPV patients were recruited and randomized into Group I (15 participants) and Group II (16 participants). Both groups showed clinical improvement. Although significant deviations of head angles were observed in group II, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups in terms of negative Dix Hallpike and severity of dizziness at the 1-week follow-up. Conclusion Although significant variations of head angles were observed during the traditional Epley maneuver by experienced physicians, these deviations were slight (less than 15°) and did not significantly affect the successful treatment outcome at 1 week, in terms of negative Dix Hallpike and severity of dizziness, when compared to the group with accurate head angle during the Epley maneuver.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of the exact versus estimated angle of head position in the Epley maneuver: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sanathorn Chowsilpa, Jakarin Chawachat, Nicha Hansudewechakul, Suwicha Kaewsiri Isaradisaikul, Charuk Hanprasertpong\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction The Epley maneuver is the recommended treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of the posterior semicircular canal (PC-BPPV). Traditionally, the angle of the patient's head in each position during the Epley maneuver is not monitored and subjectively estimated by physicians. As a result, deviations of head angles from the standard may affect the treatment result. This study aimed to compare the outcome of the Epley maneuver between the group of exact head angles and the group of subjectively estimated angles (traditional Epley maneuver). Methods A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Otolaryngology, Chiang Mai University Hospital. PC-BPPV patients were attached with the head angle measuring device and randomized into 2 groups: Group I - the exact angle group, physicians performed the Epley maneuver with accurate head angle in each step; and Group II - the estimated angle group, physicians performed the Epley maneuver by estimating the head angle (traditional Epley maneuver). The treatment outcomes were measured at 1 week in the aspects of negative Dix Hallpike results and severity of dizziness. Results Thirty-one PC-BPPV patients were recruited and randomized into Group I (15 participants) and Group II (16 participants). Both groups showed clinical improvement. Although significant deviations of head angles were observed in group II, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups in terms of negative Dix Hallpike and severity of dizziness at the 1-week follow-up. Conclusion Although significant variations of head angles were observed during the traditional Epley maneuver by experienced physicians, these deviations were slight (less than 15°) and did not significantly affect the successful treatment outcome at 1 week, in terms of negative Dix Hallpike and severity of dizziness, when compared to the group with accurate head angle during the Epley maneuver.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543528\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative effectiveness of the exact versus estimated angle of head position in the Epley maneuver: a randomized controlled trial.
Introduction The Epley maneuver is the recommended treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of the posterior semicircular canal (PC-BPPV). Traditionally, the angle of the patient's head in each position during the Epley maneuver is not monitored and subjectively estimated by physicians. As a result, deviations of head angles from the standard may affect the treatment result. This study aimed to compare the outcome of the Epley maneuver between the group of exact head angles and the group of subjectively estimated angles (traditional Epley maneuver). Methods A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Otolaryngology, Chiang Mai University Hospital. PC-BPPV patients were attached with the head angle measuring device and randomized into 2 groups: Group I - the exact angle group, physicians performed the Epley maneuver with accurate head angle in each step; and Group II - the estimated angle group, physicians performed the Epley maneuver by estimating the head angle (traditional Epley maneuver). The treatment outcomes were measured at 1 week in the aspects of negative Dix Hallpike results and severity of dizziness. Results Thirty-one PC-BPPV patients were recruited and randomized into Group I (15 participants) and Group II (16 participants). Both groups showed clinical improvement. Although significant deviations of head angles were observed in group II, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups in terms of negative Dix Hallpike and severity of dizziness at the 1-week follow-up. Conclusion Although significant variations of head angles were observed during the traditional Epley maneuver by experienced physicians, these deviations were slight (less than 15°) and did not significantly affect the successful treatment outcome at 1 week, in terms of negative Dix Hallpike and severity of dizziness, when compared to the group with accurate head angle during the Epley maneuver.
期刊介绍:
''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.