参与痴呆症实践社区:对技能、知识、网络和获得支持的影响。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Clarissa Giebel, James Watson, Megan Polden, Megan Readman, Hilary Tetlow, Mark Gabbay
{"title":"参与痴呆症实践社区:对技能、知识、网络和获得支持的影响。","authors":"Clarissa Giebel,&nbsp;James Watson,&nbsp;Megan Polden,&nbsp;Megan Readman,&nbsp;Hilary Tetlow,&nbsp;Mark Gabbay","doi":"10.1111/hex.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To deliver implementable, meaningful research and advance knowledge, different stakeholders need to be brought together regularly via a suitable platform or community of practice. The Liverpool Dementia &amp; Ageing Research Forum, set up in 2019, is a public/professional community of practice, providing in-person and remote events and activities to connect people living with dementia, unpaid carers, health and social care professionals, Third Sector representatives and commissioners. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore the experiences and impacts of engaging with Forum events by different stakeholders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Attendees of any Forum events were eligible to take part. We conducted remote semi-structured interviews about the experiences and impacts of engaging with the Forum between November 2023 and April 2024. Anonymised transcripts were coded by three research team members, including a trained public advisor (unpaid carer), using inductive thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventeen attendees participated in the study. These included people living with dementia, unpaid carers, Third Sector representatives, academics and health and social care providers. Four overarching themes were identified in the data: facilitated networking within and outside of personal expertise, improved knowledge and capacity, empowerment by having one's voice heard and diversity in stakeholders but not the background. The Forum events were utilised on a drop- in and -out basis for most attendees, often picking events that were of immediate interest to them, whilst some attended almost all events. Engaging with the Forum was found to strongly facilitate increased networking and building relationships, especially outside of stakeholder background, whilst diversity in backgrounds of attendees, such as ethnic diversity, was lacking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This Community of Practice has successfully brought together diverse stakeholders to network and expand their relationships, and increased knowledge and capacity in different stakeholder groups. Whilst the Forum was considered inclusive, future outreach work needs to ensure that greater diversity in backgrounds and personal experiences is reflected in attendees, and that a continuous flow of new attendees joins.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient and Public Involvement</h3>\n \n <p>One unpaid carer was involved as a public advisor and was supported in coding two anonymised transcripts and interpreting the findings. They also helped codesign the semi-structured topic guide.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging With a Community of Practice in Dementia: Impacts on Skills, Knowledge, Networks and Accessing Support\",\"authors\":\"Clarissa Giebel,&nbsp;James Watson,&nbsp;Megan Polden,&nbsp;Megan Readman,&nbsp;Hilary Tetlow,&nbsp;Mark Gabbay\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>To deliver implementable, meaningful research and advance knowledge, different stakeholders need to be brought together regularly via a suitable platform or community of practice. The Liverpool Dementia &amp; Ageing Research Forum, set up in 2019, is a public/professional community of practice, providing in-person and remote events and activities to connect people living with dementia, unpaid carers, health and social care professionals, Third Sector representatives and commissioners. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore the experiences and impacts of engaging with Forum events by different stakeholders.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Attendees of any Forum events were eligible to take part. We conducted remote semi-structured interviews about the experiences and impacts of engaging with the Forum between November 2023 and April 2024. Anonymised transcripts were coded by three research team members, including a trained public advisor (unpaid carer), using inductive thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventeen attendees participated in the study. These included people living with dementia, unpaid carers, Third Sector representatives, academics and health and social care providers. Four overarching themes were identified in the data: facilitated networking within and outside of personal expertise, improved knowledge and capacity, empowerment by having one's voice heard and diversity in stakeholders but not the background. The Forum events were utilised on a drop- in and -out basis for most attendees, often picking events that were of immediate interest to them, whilst some attended almost all events. Engaging with the Forum was found to strongly facilitate increased networking and building relationships, especially outside of stakeholder background, whilst diversity in backgrounds of attendees, such as ethnic diversity, was lacking.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This Community of Practice has successfully brought together diverse stakeholders to network and expand their relationships, and increased knowledge and capacity in different stakeholder groups. Whilst the Forum was considered inclusive, future outreach work needs to ensure that greater diversity in backgrounds and personal experiences is reflected in attendees, and that a continuous flow of new attendees joins.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient and Public Involvement</h3>\\n \\n <p>One unpaid carer was involved as a public advisor and was supported in coding two anonymised transcripts and interpreting the findings. They also helped codesign the semi-structured topic guide.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735733/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70154\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了提供可实施的、有意义的研究和先进的知识,不同的利益相关者需要通过合适的平台或实践社区定期聚集在一起。利物浦痴呆症与老龄化研究论坛成立于2019年,是一个公共/专业实践社区,提供面对面和远程活动和活动,将痴呆症患者、无薪护理人员、健康和社会护理专业人员、第三部门代表和专员联系起来。本研究的目的是定性地探讨不同利益相关者参与论坛活动的经验和影响。方法:任何论坛活动的参与者都有资格参加。我们在2023年11月至2024年4月期间对参与论坛的经验和影响进行了远程半结构化采访。三位研究小组成员,包括一位训练有素的公共顾问(无薪看护),使用归纳主题分析对匿名成绩单进行编码。结果:17名参与者参与了研究。这些人包括痴呆症患者、无薪护理人员、第三部门代表、学者以及卫生和社会护理提供者。数据中确定了四个总体主题:促进个人专业知识内外的网络,提高知识和能力,通过倾听自己的声音来增强权能,以及利益相关者(而不是背景)的多样性。对于大多数与会者来说,论坛的活动是断断续续的,通常会选择他们直接感兴趣的活动,而有些人几乎参加了所有的活动。我们发现,参与论坛可以极大地促进建立网络和建立关系,特别是在利益相关者背景之外,而与会者的背景多样性(如种族多样性)则缺乏。结论:这个实践社区成功地将不同的利益相关者聚集在一起,建立网络并扩大他们的关系,并增加了不同利益相关者群体的知识和能力。虽然论坛被认为是包容性的,但未来的外联工作需要确保与会者反映出背景和个人经历的更大多样性,并确保不断有新与会者加入。患者和公众参与:一名无薪护理人员作为公共顾问参与其中,并支持对两份匿名成绩单进行编码并解释研究结果。他们还帮助共同设计了半结构化的主题指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engaging With a Community of Practice in Dementia: Impacts on Skills, Knowledge, Networks and Accessing Support

Background

To deliver implementable, meaningful research and advance knowledge, different stakeholders need to be brought together regularly via a suitable platform or community of practice. The Liverpool Dementia & Ageing Research Forum, set up in 2019, is a public/professional community of practice, providing in-person and remote events and activities to connect people living with dementia, unpaid carers, health and social care professionals, Third Sector representatives and commissioners. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore the experiences and impacts of engaging with Forum events by different stakeholders.

Methods

Attendees of any Forum events were eligible to take part. We conducted remote semi-structured interviews about the experiences and impacts of engaging with the Forum between November 2023 and April 2024. Anonymised transcripts were coded by three research team members, including a trained public advisor (unpaid carer), using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Seventeen attendees participated in the study. These included people living with dementia, unpaid carers, Third Sector representatives, academics and health and social care providers. Four overarching themes were identified in the data: facilitated networking within and outside of personal expertise, improved knowledge and capacity, empowerment by having one's voice heard and diversity in stakeholders but not the background. The Forum events were utilised on a drop- in and -out basis for most attendees, often picking events that were of immediate interest to them, whilst some attended almost all events. Engaging with the Forum was found to strongly facilitate increased networking and building relationships, especially outside of stakeholder background, whilst diversity in backgrounds of attendees, such as ethnic diversity, was lacking.

Conclusions

This Community of Practice has successfully brought together diverse stakeholders to network and expand their relationships, and increased knowledge and capacity in different stakeholder groups. Whilst the Forum was considered inclusive, future outreach work needs to ensure that greater diversity in backgrounds and personal experiences is reflected in attendees, and that a continuous flow of new attendees joins.

Patient and Public Involvement

One unpaid carer was involved as a public advisor and was supported in coding two anonymised transcripts and interpreting the findings. They also helped codesign the semi-structured topic guide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信