Eman Awadallah Mohamed, Zakaria Mahran Obaid, Ibrahim Fouda
{"title":"外用0.33%酒石酸溴硝定凝胶与577 nm前黄激光治疗痤疮后红斑的比较研究。","authors":"Eman Awadallah Mohamed, Zakaria Mahran Obaid, Ibrahim Fouda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post acne erythema (PAE) is a common sequela of inflammatory acne vulgaris resulting from the dilatation of microcapillaries within the papillary dermis, thinning of the epidermis, and release of inflammatory cytokines. <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> The authors sought to compare the safety and efficacy of topical Brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel versus A 577-nm pro-yellow laser for treatment of post acne erythema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a comparative study, randomized clinical trials conducted on 60 adult patients with PAE. Patients were assigned into two groups: Group I included 30 patients who received brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel once daily for three months, and Group II included 30 patients who received Pro-yellow laser with 577-nm therapy, for four sessions at three weeks intervals. Evaluation of erythema was done by Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) scales at baseline and at the end of the therapy. The dermoscopic images were analyzed for percent area of erythema and the optical density (OD) using ImageJ® freeware.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients (73.3%) were females and eight patients (26.7%) were males in Group I. In Group II, 20 patients (66.7%) were females and 10 patients (33.3%) were males. The mean±SD age of the studied groups was 22.07 years ±2.64 ranging from 20 to 24 years in Group I versus 20.93 years ±2.88 ranging from 19 to 23 years in Group II. Clinical improvement is distributed as follows among Group I; 56.7 percent are excellent, 56.7 percent good, 26.7 percent poor, and 10 percent fair for Group II; 33.3 percent good, 6.7 percent poor, and 60 percent excellent. There was no statistically significant difference between studied groups as regard Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) mean area percentage and the optical density (OD) before treatment, while a statistically significant difference between studied groups after treatment was observed (<i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topical brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel and 577-nm pro yellow laser were effective and well tolerated therapeutic options for treatment of Post acne erythema (PAE), however the 577-nm Pro yellow laser was superior to brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel.</p>","PeriodicalId":53616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","volume":"18 1","pages":"35-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical Brimonidine Tartrate 0.33% Gel versus 577-nm Pro-yellow Laser for the Treatment of Post-acne Erythema: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Eman Awadallah Mohamed, Zakaria Mahran Obaid, Ibrahim Fouda\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post acne erythema (PAE) is a common sequela of inflammatory acne vulgaris resulting from the dilatation of microcapillaries within the papillary dermis, thinning of the epidermis, and release of inflammatory cytokines. <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> The authors sought to compare the safety and efficacy of topical Brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel versus A 577-nm pro-yellow laser for treatment of post acne erythema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a comparative study, randomized clinical trials conducted on 60 adult patients with PAE. Patients were assigned into two groups: Group I included 30 patients who received brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel once daily for three months, and Group II included 30 patients who received Pro-yellow laser with 577-nm therapy, for four sessions at three weeks intervals. Evaluation of erythema was done by Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) scales at baseline and at the end of the therapy. The dermoscopic images were analyzed for percent area of erythema and the optical density (OD) using ImageJ® freeware.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients (73.3%) were females and eight patients (26.7%) were males in Group I. In Group II, 20 patients (66.7%) were females and 10 patients (33.3%) were males. The mean±SD age of the studied groups was 22.07 years ±2.64 ranging from 20 to 24 years in Group I versus 20.93 years ±2.88 ranging from 19 to 23 years in Group II. Clinical improvement is distributed as follows among Group I; 56.7 percent are excellent, 56.7 percent good, 26.7 percent poor, and 10 percent fair for Group II; 33.3 percent good, 6.7 percent poor, and 60 percent excellent. There was no statistically significant difference between studied groups as regard Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) mean area percentage and the optical density (OD) before treatment, while a statistically significant difference between studied groups after treatment was observed (<i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topical brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel and 577-nm pro yellow laser were effective and well tolerated therapeutic options for treatment of Post acne erythema (PAE), however the 577-nm Pro yellow laser was superior to brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"35-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741167/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:痤疮后红斑(PAE)是炎性寻常性痤疮的常见后遗症,是由真皮乳头状微血管扩张、表皮变薄和炎性细胞因子释放引起的。目的:比较外用0.33%酒石酸溴莫尼定凝胶与577 nm促黄激光治疗痤疮后红斑的安全性和有效性。方法:这是一项比较研究,随机临床试验对60例成年PAE患者进行了研究。患者被分为两组:第一组包括30名患者,每天一次接受0.33%的酒石酸溴硝定凝胶治疗,持续3个月;第二组包括30名患者,接受577 nm的Pro-yellow激光治疗,每隔3周进行4次治疗。在基线和治疗结束时,通过临床红斑评估(CEA)和患者自我评估(PSA)量表对红斑进行评估。使用ImageJ®免费软件分析皮肤镜图像红斑面积百分比和光密度(OD)。结果:第一组女性22例(73.3%),男性8例(26.7%)。第二组女性20例(66.7%),男性10例(33.3%)。两组患者的平均±SD年龄分别为20 ~ 24岁(22.07岁±2.64岁)和19 ~ 23岁(20.93岁±2.88岁)。第一组临床改善情况分布如下:第二组56.7%为优秀,56.7%为良好,26.7%为差,10%为一般;33.3%的学生表现良好,6.7%的学生表现不佳,60%的学生表现优秀。治疗前临床红斑评估(Clinician’s Erythema Assessment, CEA)、患者自我评估(Patient’s Self-Assessment, PSA)平均面积百分比和光密度(optical density, OD)两组间差异无统计学意义,治疗后两组间差异有统计学意义(p)。外用0.33%酒石酸溴胺凝胶和577 nm pro yellow激光治疗痤疮后红斑(PAE)是有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择,但577 nm pro yellow激光优于0.33%酒石酸溴胺凝胶。
Topical Brimonidine Tartrate 0.33% Gel versus 577-nm Pro-yellow Laser for the Treatment of Post-acne Erythema: A Comparative Study.
Background: Post acne erythema (PAE) is a common sequela of inflammatory acne vulgaris resulting from the dilatation of microcapillaries within the papillary dermis, thinning of the epidermis, and release of inflammatory cytokines. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to compare the safety and efficacy of topical Brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel versus A 577-nm pro-yellow laser for treatment of post acne erythema.
Methods: This was a comparative study, randomized clinical trials conducted on 60 adult patients with PAE. Patients were assigned into two groups: Group I included 30 patients who received brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel once daily for three months, and Group II included 30 patients who received Pro-yellow laser with 577-nm therapy, for four sessions at three weeks intervals. Evaluation of erythema was done by Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) scales at baseline and at the end of the therapy. The dermoscopic images were analyzed for percent area of erythema and the optical density (OD) using ImageJ® freeware.
Results: Twenty-two patients (73.3%) were females and eight patients (26.7%) were males in Group I. In Group II, 20 patients (66.7%) were females and 10 patients (33.3%) were males. The mean±SD age of the studied groups was 22.07 years ±2.64 ranging from 20 to 24 years in Group I versus 20.93 years ±2.88 ranging from 19 to 23 years in Group II. Clinical improvement is distributed as follows among Group I; 56.7 percent are excellent, 56.7 percent good, 26.7 percent poor, and 10 percent fair for Group II; 33.3 percent good, 6.7 percent poor, and 60 percent excellent. There was no statistically significant difference between studied groups as regard Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) mean area percentage and the optical density (OD) before treatment, while a statistically significant difference between studied groups after treatment was observed (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Topical brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel and 577-nm pro yellow laser were effective and well tolerated therapeutic options for treatment of Post acne erythema (PAE), however the 577-nm Pro yellow laser was superior to brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel.