审查难民融入乌干达国家卫生系统:使用政策三角框架的分析。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Henry Komakech, Shatha Elnakib, Lama Bou Karroum, Evelyn Nyachwo, Winnie Adoch, Sarah Sali, Godfrey Goddie Okeny, Christopher Garimoi Orach
{"title":"审查难民融入乌干达国家卫生系统:使用政策三角框架的分析。","authors":"Henry Komakech, Shatha Elnakib, Lama Bou Karroum, Evelyn Nyachwo, Winnie Adoch, Sarah Sali, Godfrey Goddie Okeny, Christopher Garimoi Orach","doi":"10.1186/s13031-024-00640-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uganda has been confronted with a sustained influx of refugees for decades. This prompted the government to explore opportunities to integrate refugees into local service structures including its national health system. This paper chronicles the history of policies and strategies that have influenced the integration of refugees into the national health system in Uganda and investigates factors that impacted policy evolution and progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a case study approach that drew on a document review and key informant interviews with 28 respondents at national and subnational levels. Interviews were analyzed using thematic qualitative analysis and findings were organized using Walt and Gilson's Policy Triangle Framework. Data from the literature review, media review, and key informant interviews were triangulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Uganda's experience with the integration of refugee's dates to 1999 when the country first implemented the Self-reliance strategy. Since then, policy learning and evolution have taken place, with policies around integration evolving and improving over time, moving the country towards more effective implementation of integrated health services. A conducive policy environment was key as a set of legislations at national and district-levels and sector-specific plans and budgets that included refugees have provided the foundation for implementation. The integration received support and buy-in from the highest levels of government including the President and the Office of The Prime Minister. This was coupled with deliberate efforts by the government to mainstream refugee response in local plans and budgets, allowing implementation at district and sub-district levels. These factors were pivotal to the implementation of the integration agenda.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the complex, dynamic, evolving, and multifaceted nature of the multisectoral health policy process in the integration of health services in refugee settings. The findings shed light on the importance of collaboration between stakeholders, mobilization of legal and political frameworks to shape the integration of refugee health services into the national health system, and the importance of ensuring that high-level commitments translate to action and development plans at local levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":54287,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Health","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the integration of refugees into the national health system in Uganda: an analysis using the policy triangle framework.\",\"authors\":\"Henry Komakech, Shatha Elnakib, Lama Bou Karroum, Evelyn Nyachwo, Winnie Adoch, Sarah Sali, Godfrey Goddie Okeny, Christopher Garimoi Orach\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13031-024-00640-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uganda has been confronted with a sustained influx of refugees for decades. This prompted the government to explore opportunities to integrate refugees into local service structures including its national health system. This paper chronicles the history of policies and strategies that have influenced the integration of refugees into the national health system in Uganda and investigates factors that impacted policy evolution and progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a case study approach that drew on a document review and key informant interviews with 28 respondents at national and subnational levels. Interviews were analyzed using thematic qualitative analysis and findings were organized using Walt and Gilson's Policy Triangle Framework. Data from the literature review, media review, and key informant interviews were triangulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Uganda's experience with the integration of refugee's dates to 1999 when the country first implemented the Self-reliance strategy. Since then, policy learning and evolution have taken place, with policies around integration evolving and improving over time, moving the country towards more effective implementation of integrated health services. A conducive policy environment was key as a set of legislations at national and district-levels and sector-specific plans and budgets that included refugees have provided the foundation for implementation. The integration received support and buy-in from the highest levels of government including the President and the Office of The Prime Minister. This was coupled with deliberate efforts by the government to mainstream refugee response in local plans and budgets, allowing implementation at district and sub-district levels. These factors were pivotal to the implementation of the integration agenda.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the complex, dynamic, evolving, and multifaceted nature of the multisectoral health policy process in the integration of health services in refugee settings. The findings shed light on the importance of collaboration between stakeholders, mobilization of legal and political frameworks to shape the integration of refugee health services into the national health system, and the importance of ensuring that high-level commitments translate to action and development plans at local levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conflict and Health\",\"volume\":\"18 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conflict and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00640-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00640-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:几十年来,乌干达一直面临难民持续涌入的问题。这促使政府寻求机会将难民纳入包括国家卫生系统在内的地方服务结构。本文记录了影响难民融入乌干达国家卫生系统的政策和战略的历史,并调查了影响政策演变和进展的因素。方法:我们采用了案例研究方法,利用文献审查和对28名国家和国家以下各级受访者的关键信息提供者进行访谈。访谈采用专题定性分析进行分析,调查结果采用沃尔特和吉尔森的政策三角框架进行组织。来自文献综述、媒体综述和关键线人访谈的数据进行了三角分析。结果:乌干达在难民融入方面的经验可以追溯到1999年,当时该国首次实施了自力更生战略。从那时起,开始了政策学习和演变,随着时间的推移,围绕一体化的政策不断发展和改进,使该国朝着更有效地实施综合卫生服务的方向发展。有利的政策环境是关键,因为国家和地区一级的一套立法以及包括难民在内的具体部门计划和预算为执行提供了基础。这一整合得到了包括总统和总理办公室在内的政府最高层的支持和支持。与此同时,政府有意将难民应对工作纳入地方计划和预算的主流,允许在县和分区一级实施。这些因素对执行一体化议程至关重要。结论:我们的研究突出了在难民环境中整合卫生服务的多部门卫生政策进程的复杂性、动态性、演变性和多面性。调查结果揭示了利益攸关方之间合作的重要性,调动法律和政治框架,将难民卫生服务纳入国家卫生系统,以及确保高级别承诺转化为地方一级行动和发展计划的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the integration of refugees into the national health system in Uganda: an analysis using the policy triangle framework.

Background: Uganda has been confronted with a sustained influx of refugees for decades. This prompted the government to explore opportunities to integrate refugees into local service structures including its national health system. This paper chronicles the history of policies and strategies that have influenced the integration of refugees into the national health system in Uganda and investigates factors that impacted policy evolution and progression.

Methods: We used a case study approach that drew on a document review and key informant interviews with 28 respondents at national and subnational levels. Interviews were analyzed using thematic qualitative analysis and findings were organized using Walt and Gilson's Policy Triangle Framework. Data from the literature review, media review, and key informant interviews were triangulated.

Results: Uganda's experience with the integration of refugee's dates to 1999 when the country first implemented the Self-reliance strategy. Since then, policy learning and evolution have taken place, with policies around integration evolving and improving over time, moving the country towards more effective implementation of integrated health services. A conducive policy environment was key as a set of legislations at national and district-levels and sector-specific plans and budgets that included refugees have provided the foundation for implementation. The integration received support and buy-in from the highest levels of government including the President and the Office of The Prime Minister. This was coupled with deliberate efforts by the government to mainstream refugee response in local plans and budgets, allowing implementation at district and sub-district levels. These factors were pivotal to the implementation of the integration agenda.

Conclusion: Our study highlights the complex, dynamic, evolving, and multifaceted nature of the multisectoral health policy process in the integration of health services in refugee settings. The findings shed light on the importance of collaboration between stakeholders, mobilization of legal and political frameworks to shape the integration of refugee health services into the national health system, and the importance of ensuring that high-level commitments translate to action and development plans at local levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict and Health
Conflict and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Conflict and Health is a highly-accessed, open access journal providing a global platform to disseminate insightful and impactful studies documenting the public health impacts and responses related to armed conflict, humanitarian crises, and forced migration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信