Chelsea G Cox, Matthias Kirch, Dianne Singer, Erica Solway, Preeti N Malani, Jeffrey T Kullgren, J Scott Roberts
{"title":"美国老年人对阿尔茨海默病认知筛查和血液生物标志物检测的经验和观点","authors":"Chelsea G Cox, Matthias Kirch, Dianne Singer, Erica Solway, Preeti N Malani, Jeffrey T Kullgren, J Scott Roberts","doi":"10.1002/dad2.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dementia is underdiagnosed in the United States. Understanding of older adults' experiences with screening is needed to optimize diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>US adults ages 65 to 80 (<i>N</i> = 1298) were surveyed on experiences with cognitive screening and blood biomarker (BBM) testing. Regression models estimated associations between characteristics and screening use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most older adults were aware of screening (71%); 41% reported ever being screened. Older age, higher education, retirement, poorer health, and family history of dementia were associated with higher odds of screening; Hispanic and non-Hispanic Asian race/ethnicity were associated with lower odds (<i>p</i> < .05). Most older adults were unaware of BBM (81%); few wanted testing immediately (9%). Although older adults held positive views about screening and BBM, half reported concerns about distress or stigma if tests indicated risk.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Cognitive screening rates remain low. Older adults view screening and BBM as useful to inform health decisions but have concerns about potential harms.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Only one in five older US adults report having cognitive screening in the past year.Sociodemographic and health factors may influence whether older adults receive cognitive screening.Most older adults have positive views about cognitive screening and BBM testing.Many older adults would be concerned about distress or stigma if test result indicated dementia risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"17 1","pages":"e70067"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Older US adults' experiences with and views about cognitive screening and blood biomarker testing for Alzheimer's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea G Cox, Matthias Kirch, Dianne Singer, Erica Solway, Preeti N Malani, Jeffrey T Kullgren, J Scott Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dad2.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dementia is underdiagnosed in the United States. Understanding of older adults' experiences with screening is needed to optimize diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>US adults ages 65 to 80 (<i>N</i> = 1298) were surveyed on experiences with cognitive screening and blood biomarker (BBM) testing. Regression models estimated associations between characteristics and screening use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most older adults were aware of screening (71%); 41% reported ever being screened. Older age, higher education, retirement, poorer health, and family history of dementia were associated with higher odds of screening; Hispanic and non-Hispanic Asian race/ethnicity were associated with lower odds (<i>p</i> < .05). Most older adults were unaware of BBM (81%); few wanted testing immediately (9%). Although older adults held positive views about screening and BBM, half reported concerns about distress or stigma if tests indicated risk.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Cognitive screening rates remain low. Older adults view screening and BBM as useful to inform health decisions but have concerns about potential harms.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Only one in five older US adults report having cognitive screening in the past year.Sociodemographic and health factors may influence whether older adults receive cognitive screening.Most older adults have positive views about cognitive screening and BBM testing.Many older adults would be concerned about distress or stigma if test result indicated dementia risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"e70067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736703/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Older US adults' experiences with and views about cognitive screening and blood biomarker testing for Alzheimer's disease.
Introduction: Dementia is underdiagnosed in the United States. Understanding of older adults' experiences with screening is needed to optimize diagnosis.
Methods: US adults ages 65 to 80 (N = 1298) were surveyed on experiences with cognitive screening and blood biomarker (BBM) testing. Regression models estimated associations between characteristics and screening use.
Results: Most older adults were aware of screening (71%); 41% reported ever being screened. Older age, higher education, retirement, poorer health, and family history of dementia were associated with higher odds of screening; Hispanic and non-Hispanic Asian race/ethnicity were associated with lower odds (p < .05). Most older adults were unaware of BBM (81%); few wanted testing immediately (9%). Although older adults held positive views about screening and BBM, half reported concerns about distress or stigma if tests indicated risk.
Discussion: Cognitive screening rates remain low. Older adults view screening and BBM as useful to inform health decisions but have concerns about potential harms.
Highlights: Only one in five older US adults report having cognitive screening in the past year.Sociodemographic and health factors may influence whether older adults receive cognitive screening.Most older adults have positive views about cognitive screening and BBM testing.Many older adults would be concerned about distress or stigma if test result indicated dementia risk.
期刊介绍:
Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.