透视和锥束CT引导机器人干预。

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Brenda Chahla, Merve Ozen
{"title":"透视和锥束CT引导机器人干预。","authors":"Brenda Chahla, Merve Ozen","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2024.101007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Developments in robotic interventions have greatly affected the field of interventional radiology (IR), particularly when combined with imaging modalities such as fluoroscopy and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The aim of this review is to compare and evaluate the safety, precision, and clinical outcomes of fluoroscopy and CBCT-guided robotic interventions in IR. An extensive search of the literature on PubMed and Google Scholar databases was conducted up to November 2024. Searched terms included \"robotic interventions,\" \"fluoroscopy guidance,\" \"cone-beam CT guidance,\" and \"robotic surgery.\" Literature review showed improved patient outcomes in robotic-assisted procedures, with fewer complications and higher success rates especially in anatomically challenging cases. Fluoroscopy-guided robotic interventions provide real-time imaging, allowing for accurate interventions while CBCT-guided procedures offer enhanced 3D visualization, reducing radiation exposure while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy and shorter needle puncture times. Both fluoroscopy and CBCT-guided robotic interventions play a critical role in advancing interventional radiology and are expected to improve procedural outcomes in IR.</p>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"27 4","pages":"101007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluoroscopy and Cone Beam CT Guidance in Robotic Interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Brenda Chahla, Merve Ozen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tvir.2024.101007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Developments in robotic interventions have greatly affected the field of interventional radiology (IR), particularly when combined with imaging modalities such as fluoroscopy and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The aim of this review is to compare and evaluate the safety, precision, and clinical outcomes of fluoroscopy and CBCT-guided robotic interventions in IR. An extensive search of the literature on PubMed and Google Scholar databases was conducted up to November 2024. Searched terms included \\\"robotic interventions,\\\" \\\"fluoroscopy guidance,\\\" \\\"cone-beam CT guidance,\\\" and \\\"robotic surgery.\\\" Literature review showed improved patient outcomes in robotic-assisted procedures, with fewer complications and higher success rates especially in anatomically challenging cases. Fluoroscopy-guided robotic interventions provide real-time imaging, allowing for accurate interventions while CBCT-guided procedures offer enhanced 3D visualization, reducing radiation exposure while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy and shorter needle puncture times. Both fluoroscopy and CBCT-guided robotic interventions play a critical role in advancing interventional radiology and are expected to improve procedural outcomes in IR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"101007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvir.2024.101007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvir.2024.101007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人干预的发展极大地影响了介入放射学(IR)领域,特别是当与成像方式(如透视和锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT))相结合时。本综述的目的是比较和评估透视和cbct引导的机器人干预在IR中的安全性、准确性和临床结果。到2024年11月,对PubMed和b谷歌Scholar数据库的文献进行了广泛的搜索。搜索词包括“机器人干预”、“透视引导”、“锥束CT引导”和“机器人手术”。文献综述显示,机器人辅助手术改善了患者的预后,并发症更少,成功率更高,特别是在解剖困难的病例中。透视引导的机器人干预提供实时成像,允许准确的干预,而cbct引导的程序提供增强的3D可视化,减少辐射暴露,同时保持高诊断准确性和更短的穿刺针时间。透视和cbct引导下的机器人干预在推进介入放射学中发挥着关键作用,并有望改善IR的手术结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluoroscopy and Cone Beam CT Guidance in Robotic Interventions.

Developments in robotic interventions have greatly affected the field of interventional radiology (IR), particularly when combined with imaging modalities such as fluoroscopy and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The aim of this review is to compare and evaluate the safety, precision, and clinical outcomes of fluoroscopy and CBCT-guided robotic interventions in IR. An extensive search of the literature on PubMed and Google Scholar databases was conducted up to November 2024. Searched terms included "robotic interventions," "fluoroscopy guidance," "cone-beam CT guidance," and "robotic surgery." Literature review showed improved patient outcomes in robotic-assisted procedures, with fewer complications and higher success rates especially in anatomically challenging cases. Fluoroscopy-guided robotic interventions provide real-time imaging, allowing for accurate interventions while CBCT-guided procedures offer enhanced 3D visualization, reducing radiation exposure while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy and shorter needle puncture times. Both fluoroscopy and CBCT-guided robotic interventions play a critical role in advancing interventional radiology and are expected to improve procedural outcomes in IR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Interventional radiology is an area of clinical diagnosis and management that is highly technique-oriented. Therefore, the format of this quarterly journal, which combines the visual impact of an atlas with the currency of a journal, lends itself perfectly to presenting the topics. Each issue is guest edited by a leader in the field and is focused on a single clinical technique or problem. The presentation is enhanced by superb illustrations and descriptive narrative outlining the steps of a particular procedure. Interventional radiologists, neuroradiologists, vascular surgeons and neurosurgeons will find this a useful addition to the clinical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信