Calley E Fisk, Jennifer A Ailshire, Katrina M Walsemann
{"title":"生活在历史上的红线社区和黑人和白人成年人的认知功能。","authors":"Calley E Fisk, Jennifer A Ailshire, Katrina M Walsemann","doi":"10.1177/08982643251315020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We determined if living in historically redlined neighborhoods was associated with level and change in cognitive functioning and if this association differed for Black and White older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked the Health and Retirement Study 1998-2018 data to redlining scores from the Historic Redlining Indicator data. Our sample included adults aged 50 years and older (24,230 respondents, 129,618 person-period observations). Using three-level linear mixed models, we estimated the relationship between living in historically redlined neighborhoods on level and change in cognitive functioning for pooled and race-stratified samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents of historically redlined \"Declining\" and \"Hazardous\" neighborhoods had lower cognitive functioning scores compared to residents of \"Best/Desirable\" neighborhoods. Among Black adults, living in \"Hazardous\" neighborhoods was associated with slower declines in cognitive functioning compared to living in \"Best/Desirable\" neighborhoods.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Historical redlining is associated with older adults' cognitive functioning, underscoring the importance of sociohistorical context for the neighborhood-cognition relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":51385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Health","volume":" ","pages":"8982643251315020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Living in Historically Redlined Neighborhoods and the Cognitive Function of Black and White Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Calley E Fisk, Jennifer A Ailshire, Katrina M Walsemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08982643251315020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We determined if living in historically redlined neighborhoods was associated with level and change in cognitive functioning and if this association differed for Black and White older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked the Health and Retirement Study 1998-2018 data to redlining scores from the Historic Redlining Indicator data. Our sample included adults aged 50 years and older (24,230 respondents, 129,618 person-period observations). Using three-level linear mixed models, we estimated the relationship between living in historically redlined neighborhoods on level and change in cognitive functioning for pooled and race-stratified samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents of historically redlined \\\"Declining\\\" and \\\"Hazardous\\\" neighborhoods had lower cognitive functioning scores compared to residents of \\\"Best/Desirable\\\" neighborhoods. Among Black adults, living in \\\"Hazardous\\\" neighborhoods was associated with slower declines in cognitive functioning compared to living in \\\"Best/Desirable\\\" neighborhoods.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Historical redlining is associated with older adults' cognitive functioning, underscoring the importance of sociohistorical context for the neighborhood-cognition relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8982643251315020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643251315020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643251315020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Living in Historically Redlined Neighborhoods and the Cognitive Function of Black and White Adults.
Objectives: We determined if living in historically redlined neighborhoods was associated with level and change in cognitive functioning and if this association differed for Black and White older adults.
Methods: We linked the Health and Retirement Study 1998-2018 data to redlining scores from the Historic Redlining Indicator data. Our sample included adults aged 50 years and older (24,230 respondents, 129,618 person-period observations). Using three-level linear mixed models, we estimated the relationship between living in historically redlined neighborhoods on level and change in cognitive functioning for pooled and race-stratified samples.
Results: Residents of historically redlined "Declining" and "Hazardous" neighborhoods had lower cognitive functioning scores compared to residents of "Best/Desirable" neighborhoods. Among Black adults, living in "Hazardous" neighborhoods was associated with slower declines in cognitive functioning compared to living in "Best/Desirable" neighborhoods.
Discussion: Historical redlining is associated with older adults' cognitive functioning, underscoring the importance of sociohistorical context for the neighborhood-cognition relationship.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Aging and Health is an interdisciplinary forum for the presentation of research findings and scholarly exchange in the area of aging and health. Manuscripts are sought that deal with social and behavioral factors related to health and aging. Disciplines represented include the behavioral and social sciences, public health, epidemiology, demography, health services research, nursing, social work, medicine, and related disciplines. Although preference is given to manuscripts presenting the findings of original research, review and methodological pieces will also be considered.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
