两分钟足以表征人类下产道在分娩第一阶段的粘弹性特性。

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mariana Masteling , John O.L. DeLancey , James A. Ashton-Miller
{"title":"两分钟足以表征人类下产道在分娩第一阶段的粘弹性特性。","authors":"Mariana Masteling ,&nbsp;John O.L. DeLancey ,&nbsp;James A. Ashton-Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The lower birth canal is the final constriction through which a fetal head must pass for delivery. Unfortunately, injuries to the lower birth canal tissues occur in up to 19 % of first-time vaginal deliveries due to the 300 % stretch required.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a secondary analysis of data from 56 healthy nullipara recorded by a lower birth canal dilator during the first stage of labor. A four parameter Fractional Zener rheological Model was used to characterize the canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor. We tested the (null) hypothesis that the Model constants identified during the initial 20 s ramp-and-5-min-hold dilation from 40 to 55 mm will not accurately predict the final hoop tension after 60 min of slower dilation.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The null hypothesis was rejected in that when the four Model parameters were calculated for all nullipara from the 20-s-ramp-and-5-min-hold data, the relative fit error was 8 ± 4 %, and the relative prediction error after 60 min of dilation was 10 ± 5 %. Furthermore, when the Model constants were instead calculated from the 20 s ramp and only the initial 90 s of the 5-min-hold, the error was still acceptable: 13 ± 4 % for relative fit and 13 ± 18 % for relative prediction.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Two minutes is sufficient to characterize canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor and identify those with stiffer tissues at higher risk for a pelvic floor injury during delivery. This could form the basis for a clinical test predicting injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 106430"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two minutes is sufficient to characterize the viscoelastic properties of the human lower birth canal during the first stage of labor\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Masteling ,&nbsp;John O.L. DeLancey ,&nbsp;James A. Ashton-Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The lower birth canal is the final constriction through which a fetal head must pass for delivery. Unfortunately, injuries to the lower birth canal tissues occur in up to 19 % of first-time vaginal deliveries due to the 300 % stretch required.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a secondary analysis of data from 56 healthy nullipara recorded by a lower birth canal dilator during the first stage of labor. A four parameter Fractional Zener rheological Model was used to characterize the canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor. We tested the (null) hypothesis that the Model constants identified during the initial 20 s ramp-and-5-min-hold dilation from 40 to 55 mm will not accurately predict the final hoop tension after 60 min of slower dilation.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The null hypothesis was rejected in that when the four Model parameters were calculated for all nullipara from the 20-s-ramp-and-5-min-hold data, the relative fit error was 8 ± 4 %, and the relative prediction error after 60 min of dilation was 10 ± 5 %. Furthermore, when the Model constants were instead calculated from the 20 s ramp and only the initial 90 s of the 5-min-hold, the error was still acceptable: 13 ± 4 % for relative fit and 13 ± 18 % for relative prediction.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Two minutes is sufficient to characterize canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor and identify those with stiffer tissues at higher risk for a pelvic floor injury during delivery. This could form the basis for a clinical test predicting injury.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下产道是胎儿头分娩时必经的最后一条狭窄通道。不幸的是,由于需要300%的拉伸,高达19%的首次阴道分娩会损伤下产道组织。方法:这是对56例健康无产妇在分娩第一阶段通过下产道扩张器记录的资料的二次分析。采用四参数分数齐纳流变模型表征产程第一阶段产道粘弹性特性。我们检验了(零)假设,即在最初的20秒斜坡和5分钟保持从40到55 mm的扩张过程中确定的模型常数不能准确预测60分钟缓慢扩张后的最终环张力。结果:从20 s斜坡和5 min保持数据中计算4个模型参数,相对拟合误差为8±4%,扩张60 min后的相对预测误差为10±5%,拒绝原假设。此外,当模型常数从20 s斜坡和5 min保持的最初90 s计算时,误差仍然是可以接受的:相对拟合为13±4%,相对预测为13±18%。解释:两分钟足以表征分娩第一阶段的管道粘弹性特性,并识别分娩期间骨盆底损伤风险较高的硬组织。这可能成为预测损伤的临床试验的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two minutes is sufficient to characterize the viscoelastic properties of the human lower birth canal during the first stage of labor

Background

The lower birth canal is the final constriction through which a fetal head must pass for delivery. Unfortunately, injuries to the lower birth canal tissues occur in up to 19 % of first-time vaginal deliveries due to the 300 % stretch required.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of data from 56 healthy nullipara recorded by a lower birth canal dilator during the first stage of labor. A four parameter Fractional Zener rheological Model was used to characterize the canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor. We tested the (null) hypothesis that the Model constants identified during the initial 20 s ramp-and-5-min-hold dilation from 40 to 55 mm will not accurately predict the final hoop tension after 60 min of slower dilation.

Findings

The null hypothesis was rejected in that when the four Model parameters were calculated for all nullipara from the 20-s-ramp-and-5-min-hold data, the relative fit error was 8 ± 4 %, and the relative prediction error after 60 min of dilation was 10 ± 5 %. Furthermore, when the Model constants were instead calculated from the 20 s ramp and only the initial 90 s of the 5-min-hold, the error was still acceptable: 13 ± 4 % for relative fit and 13 ± 18 % for relative prediction.

Interpretation

Two minutes is sufficient to characterize canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor and identify those with stiffer tissues at higher risk for a pelvic floor injury during delivery. This could form the basis for a clinical test predicting injury.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信