Mariana Masteling , John O.L. DeLancey , James A. Ashton-Miller
{"title":"两分钟足以表征人类下产道在分娩第一阶段的粘弹性特性。","authors":"Mariana Masteling , John O.L. DeLancey , James A. Ashton-Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The lower birth canal is the final constriction through which a fetal head must pass for delivery. Unfortunately, injuries to the lower birth canal tissues occur in up to 19 % of first-time vaginal deliveries due to the 300 % stretch required.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a secondary analysis of data from 56 healthy nullipara recorded by a lower birth canal dilator during the first stage of labor. A four parameter Fractional Zener rheological Model was used to characterize the canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor. We tested the (null) hypothesis that the Model constants identified during the initial 20 s ramp-and-5-min-hold dilation from 40 to 55 mm will not accurately predict the final hoop tension after 60 min of slower dilation.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The null hypothesis was rejected in that when the four Model parameters were calculated for all nullipara from the 20-s-ramp-and-5-min-hold data, the relative fit error was 8 ± 4 %, and the relative prediction error after 60 min of dilation was 10 ± 5 %. Furthermore, when the Model constants were instead calculated from the 20 s ramp and only the initial 90 s of the 5-min-hold, the error was still acceptable: 13 ± 4 % for relative fit and 13 ± 18 % for relative prediction.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Two minutes is sufficient to characterize canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor and identify those with stiffer tissues at higher risk for a pelvic floor injury during delivery. This could form the basis for a clinical test predicting injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 106430"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two minutes is sufficient to characterize the viscoelastic properties of the human lower birth canal during the first stage of labor\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Masteling , John O.L. DeLancey , James A. Ashton-Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The lower birth canal is the final constriction through which a fetal head must pass for delivery. Unfortunately, injuries to the lower birth canal tissues occur in up to 19 % of first-time vaginal deliveries due to the 300 % stretch required.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a secondary analysis of data from 56 healthy nullipara recorded by a lower birth canal dilator during the first stage of labor. A four parameter Fractional Zener rheological Model was used to characterize the canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor. We tested the (null) hypothesis that the Model constants identified during the initial 20 s ramp-and-5-min-hold dilation from 40 to 55 mm will not accurately predict the final hoop tension after 60 min of slower dilation.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The null hypothesis was rejected in that when the four Model parameters were calculated for all nullipara from the 20-s-ramp-and-5-min-hold data, the relative fit error was 8 ± 4 %, and the relative prediction error after 60 min of dilation was 10 ± 5 %. Furthermore, when the Model constants were instead calculated from the 20 s ramp and only the initial 90 s of the 5-min-hold, the error was still acceptable: 13 ± 4 % for relative fit and 13 ± 18 % for relative prediction.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Two minutes is sufficient to characterize canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor and identify those with stiffer tissues at higher risk for a pelvic floor injury during delivery. This could form the basis for a clinical test predicting injury.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Two minutes is sufficient to characterize the viscoelastic properties of the human lower birth canal during the first stage of labor
Background
The lower birth canal is the final constriction through which a fetal head must pass for delivery. Unfortunately, injuries to the lower birth canal tissues occur in up to 19 % of first-time vaginal deliveries due to the 300 % stretch required.
Methods
This is a secondary analysis of data from 56 healthy nullipara recorded by a lower birth canal dilator during the first stage of labor. A four parameter Fractional Zener rheological Model was used to characterize the canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor. We tested the (null) hypothesis that the Model constants identified during the initial 20 s ramp-and-5-min-hold dilation from 40 to 55 mm will not accurately predict the final hoop tension after 60 min of slower dilation.
Findings
The null hypothesis was rejected in that when the four Model parameters were calculated for all nullipara from the 20-s-ramp-and-5-min-hold data, the relative fit error was 8 ± 4 %, and the relative prediction error after 60 min of dilation was 10 ± 5 %. Furthermore, when the Model constants were instead calculated from the 20 s ramp and only the initial 90 s of the 5-min-hold, the error was still acceptable: 13 ± 4 % for relative fit and 13 ± 18 % for relative prediction.
Interpretation
Two minutes is sufficient to characterize canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor and identify those with stiffer tissues at higher risk for a pelvic floor injury during delivery. This could form the basis for a clinical test predicting injury.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.