Felipe de Souza Serenza , Marília Manuella Simões Augusto Rizzato , Fernando Vieira , Kevin James McQuade , Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira
{"title":"上肢骨折的运动学分析:对康复策略的见解。","authors":"Felipe de Souza Serenza , Marília Manuella Simões Augusto Rizzato , Fernando Vieira , Kevin James McQuade , Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Upper limb fractures significantly alter movement, impacting function and recovery. Three-dimensional motion analysis allows precise assessment of these changes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty patients were divided into four groups: shoulder, elbow, wrist fractures, and controls. Functional assessment was performed using the DASH questionnaire, followed by three-dimensional kinematic analysis with eight Oqus 300 cameras and 14 reflective markers on the thorax, scapula, humerus, forearm, and hand. The Acromion Marker Cluster method was used for accurate scapular tracking. Tasks analyzed included hand on shoulder, hand on back, and hand on neck. All measured variables are expressed in degrees. The analysis focused on the differences in maximum joint angles for each degree of freedom across the tasks. These differences were assessed using MANOVA, followed by ANOVAs and Tukey's post hoc test when applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Significant kinematic differences were observed between the fracture groups and the control group across all tasks. Shoulder fracture patients exhibited the greatest reductions in humeral flexion and abduction. Elbow fracture patients showed the most restricted elbow flexion. Wrist fracture patients presented significantly reduced radial/ulnar deviation. These movement impairments were observed across all tasks, with the most pronounced limitations seen in the hand-to-shoulder task. Effect sizes (η<sup>2</sup>) indicated clinically meaningful impacts, particularly for shoulder and wrist movements.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This study reveals distinct kinematic alterations following upper limb osteosynthesis, emphasizing the need for individualized rehabilitation strategies addressing these specific movement impairments to optimize recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 106432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinematic analysis of upper limb fractures: Insights for rehabilitation strategies\",\"authors\":\"Felipe de Souza Serenza , Marília Manuella Simões Augusto Rizzato , Fernando Vieira , Kevin James McQuade , Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Upper limb fractures significantly alter movement, impacting function and recovery. Three-dimensional motion analysis allows precise assessment of these changes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty patients were divided into four groups: shoulder, elbow, wrist fractures, and controls. Functional assessment was performed using the DASH questionnaire, followed by three-dimensional kinematic analysis with eight Oqus 300 cameras and 14 reflective markers on the thorax, scapula, humerus, forearm, and hand. The Acromion Marker Cluster method was used for accurate scapular tracking. Tasks analyzed included hand on shoulder, hand on back, and hand on neck. All measured variables are expressed in degrees. The analysis focused on the differences in maximum joint angles for each degree of freedom across the tasks. These differences were assessed using MANOVA, followed by ANOVAs and Tukey's post hoc test when applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Significant kinematic differences were observed between the fracture groups and the control group across all tasks. Shoulder fracture patients exhibited the greatest reductions in humeral flexion and abduction. Elbow fracture patients showed the most restricted elbow flexion. Wrist fracture patients presented significantly reduced radial/ulnar deviation. These movement impairments were observed across all tasks, with the most pronounced limitations seen in the hand-to-shoulder task. Effect sizes (η<sup>2</sup>) indicated clinically meaningful impacts, particularly for shoulder and wrist movements.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This study reveals distinct kinematic alterations following upper limb osteosynthesis, emphasizing the need for individualized rehabilitation strategies addressing these specific movement impairments to optimize recovery.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026800332500004X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026800332500004X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Kinematic analysis of upper limb fractures: Insights for rehabilitation strategies
Background
Upper limb fractures significantly alter movement, impacting function and recovery. Three-dimensional motion analysis allows precise assessment of these changes.
Methods
Sixty patients were divided into four groups: shoulder, elbow, wrist fractures, and controls. Functional assessment was performed using the DASH questionnaire, followed by three-dimensional kinematic analysis with eight Oqus 300 cameras and 14 reflective markers on the thorax, scapula, humerus, forearm, and hand. The Acromion Marker Cluster method was used for accurate scapular tracking. Tasks analyzed included hand on shoulder, hand on back, and hand on neck. All measured variables are expressed in degrees. The analysis focused on the differences in maximum joint angles for each degree of freedom across the tasks. These differences were assessed using MANOVA, followed by ANOVAs and Tukey's post hoc test when applicable.
Findings
Significant kinematic differences were observed between the fracture groups and the control group across all tasks. Shoulder fracture patients exhibited the greatest reductions in humeral flexion and abduction. Elbow fracture patients showed the most restricted elbow flexion. Wrist fracture patients presented significantly reduced radial/ulnar deviation. These movement impairments were observed across all tasks, with the most pronounced limitations seen in the hand-to-shoulder task. Effect sizes (η2) indicated clinically meaningful impacts, particularly for shoulder and wrist movements.
Interpretation
This study reveals distinct kinematic alterations following upper limb osteosynthesis, emphasizing the need for individualized rehabilitation strategies addressing these specific movement impairments to optimize recovery.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.