脊髓损伤的体力活动个体在休闲时间体力活动中的感知障碍。

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Paul K Watson, Laura Stendell, Camila Quel De Oliveira, James W Middleton, Mohit Arora, Glen M Davis
{"title":"脊髓损伤的体力活动个体在休闲时间体力活动中的感知障碍。","authors":"Paul K Watson, Laura Stendell, Camila Quel De Oliveira, James W Middleton, Mohit Arora, Glen M Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate barriers to leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) for physically active people with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>General community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred and five physically active individuals with SCI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Semi-structured interviews and surveys.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Participants were surveyed and interviewed to determine barriers and determinants of LTPA participation. SCI-specific physical activity (PA) guideline adherence was documented. Barriers were categorized using the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior model, and regression statistics were used to determine relationships between LTPA volume and barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health problems, costs of equipment and programs, pain, and a lack of energy were the most common capability barriers, and a lack of accessible facilities, confidence in the knowledge and skill of a health professional, and a lack of time were common opportunity barriers. Motivation barriers pertained to self-consciousness in a fitness center and a lack of interest. Believing LTPA to be too difficult, uninteresting, and unable to improve health emerged as significant barriers to SCI-specific PA guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCI-specific PA guideline adherence was below 50% in physically active individuals. There are still numerous capability and opportunity barriers that physically active people with SCI must overcome when engaging in LTPA. Motivational barriers such as feeling self-conscious in a fitness center significantly influence PA guideline compliance in this population. Service providers should emphasize the benefit of LTPA to people with SCI while providing LTPA options that facilitate enjoyment, interest, and inclusivity, particularly for those who do not meet PA guideline recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"6 4","pages":"100380"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Barriers to Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Physically Active Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Paul K Watson, Laura Stendell, Camila Quel De Oliveira, James W Middleton, Mohit Arora, Glen M Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate barriers to leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) for physically active people with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>General community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred and five physically active individuals with SCI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Semi-structured interviews and surveys.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Participants were surveyed and interviewed to determine barriers and determinants of LTPA participation. SCI-specific physical activity (PA) guideline adherence was documented. Barriers were categorized using the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior model, and regression statistics were used to determine relationships between LTPA volume and barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health problems, costs of equipment and programs, pain, and a lack of energy were the most common capability barriers, and a lack of accessible facilities, confidence in the knowledge and skill of a health professional, and a lack of time were common opportunity barriers. Motivation barriers pertained to self-consciousness in a fitness center and a lack of interest. Believing LTPA to be too difficult, uninteresting, and unable to improve health emerged as significant barriers to SCI-specific PA guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCI-specific PA guideline adherence was below 50% in physically active individuals. There are still numerous capability and opportunity barriers that physically active people with SCI must overcome when engaging in LTPA. Motivational barriers such as feeling self-conscious in a fitness center significantly influence PA guideline compliance in this population. Service providers should emphasize the benefit of LTPA to people with SCI while providing LTPA options that facilitate enjoyment, interest, and inclusivity, particularly for those who do not meet PA guideline recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"100380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734005/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨体力活动者脊髓损伤(SCI)休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)障碍。设计:前瞻性横断面。设置:普通社区。参与者:105名体力活动的SCI患者。干预措施:半结构化访谈和调查。主要结果测量:对参与者进行调查和访谈,以确定LTPA参与的障碍和决定因素。记录了sci特异性身体活动(PA)指南的遵守情况。使用能力、机会、动机和行为模型对障碍进行分类,并使用回归统计来确定LTPA量与障碍之间的关系。结果:健康问题、设备和方案的成本、疼痛和缺乏精力是最常见的能力障碍,而缺乏无障碍设施、对卫生专业人员的知识和技能的信心以及缺乏时间是常见的机会障碍。动机障碍与健身中心的自我意识和缺乏兴趣有关。认为LTPA太困难、无趣、不能改善健康成为sci特异性PA指南依从性的重大障碍。结论:运动个体的sci特异性PA指南依从性低于50%。肢体活跃的脊髓损伤患者在进行LTPA时仍然需要克服许多能力和机会障碍。动机障碍,如在健身中心感到自我意识显著影响该人群的PA指南依从性。服务提供者应强调LTPA对脊髓损伤患者的益处,同时提供LTPA选项,以促进享受、兴趣和包容性,特别是对那些不符合PA指南建议的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived Barriers to Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Physically Active Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.

Objective: To investigate barriers to leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) for physically active people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design: Prospective cross-sectional.

Setting: General community.

Participants: One hundred and five physically active individuals with SCI.

Interventions: Semi-structured interviews and surveys.

Main outcome measure: Participants were surveyed and interviewed to determine barriers and determinants of LTPA participation. SCI-specific physical activity (PA) guideline adherence was documented. Barriers were categorized using the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior model, and regression statistics were used to determine relationships between LTPA volume and barriers.

Results: Health problems, costs of equipment and programs, pain, and a lack of energy were the most common capability barriers, and a lack of accessible facilities, confidence in the knowledge and skill of a health professional, and a lack of time were common opportunity barriers. Motivation barriers pertained to self-consciousness in a fitness center and a lack of interest. Believing LTPA to be too difficult, uninteresting, and unable to improve health emerged as significant barriers to SCI-specific PA guideline adherence.

Conclusion: SCI-specific PA guideline adherence was below 50% in physically active individuals. There are still numerous capability and opportunity barriers that physically active people with SCI must overcome when engaging in LTPA. Motivational barriers such as feeling self-conscious in a fitness center significantly influence PA guideline compliance in this population. Service providers should emphasize the benefit of LTPA to people with SCI while providing LTPA options that facilitate enjoyment, interest, and inclusivity, particularly for those who do not meet PA guideline recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信