量化耳鸣感知改善:获得最小掩蔽水平的最小临床重要差异。

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Tae-Jun Jin, Sumin Lee, Donghyeok Lee, In-Ki Jin
{"title":"量化耳鸣感知改善:获得最小掩蔽水平的最小临床重要差异。","authors":"Tae-Jun Jin, Sumin Lee, Donghyeok Lee, In-Ki Jin","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tools that can reliably measure changes in the perception of tinnitus following interventions are lacking. The minimum masking level, defined as the lowest level at which tinnitus is completely masked, is a candidate for quantifying changes in tinnitus perception. In this study, we aimed to determine minimal clinically important differences for minimum masking level.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 3-month tinnitus intervention combining counseling and sound therapy was conducted in 74 participants with chronic tinnitus. Minimum masking levels were measured at baseline and 3 months. The clinical global impression was evaluated at 3 months to measure changes in participants' self-perception of tinnitus. The minimal clinically important difference of the minimum masking level was calculated using anchored-based, effect size, standard error measurement, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The minimal clinically important difference analysis of the minimum masking level yielded a -5.5 dB SL from the receiver operating characteristic curve, a -8.1 dB SL from the standard error measurement, a -9.2 dB SL from the effect size, and a -10.3 dB SL from the anchor-based analysis. Of these, the minimal clinically important difference value with optimized sensitivity (.704) and specificity (.957) was a -5.5 dB SL, determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed minimal clinically important difference value of the minimum masking level (-5.5 dB SL) provides a good level of sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the minimum masking level may be an alternative for measuring changes in tinnitus perception.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28156229.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"827-838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Tinnitus Perception Improvement: Deriving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Minimum Masking Level.\",\"authors\":\"Tae-Jun Jin, Sumin Lee, Donghyeok Lee, In-Ki Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tools that can reliably measure changes in the perception of tinnitus following interventions are lacking. The minimum masking level, defined as the lowest level at which tinnitus is completely masked, is a candidate for quantifying changes in tinnitus perception. In this study, we aimed to determine minimal clinically important differences for minimum masking level.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 3-month tinnitus intervention combining counseling and sound therapy was conducted in 74 participants with chronic tinnitus. Minimum masking levels were measured at baseline and 3 months. The clinical global impression was evaluated at 3 months to measure changes in participants' self-perception of tinnitus. The minimal clinically important difference of the minimum masking level was calculated using anchored-based, effect size, standard error measurement, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The minimal clinically important difference analysis of the minimum masking level yielded a -5.5 dB SL from the receiver operating characteristic curve, a -8.1 dB SL from the standard error measurement, a -9.2 dB SL from the effect size, and a -10.3 dB SL from the anchor-based analysis. Of these, the minimal clinically important difference value with optimized sensitivity (.704) and specificity (.957) was a -5.5 dB SL, determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed minimal clinically important difference value of the minimum masking level (-5.5 dB SL) provides a good level of sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the minimum masking level may be an alternative for measuring changes in tinnitus perception.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28156229.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"827-838\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00374\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00374","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:缺乏能够可靠地测量干预后耳鸣感知变化的工具。最低掩蔽水平,定义为耳鸣被完全掩盖的最低水平,是量化耳鸣感知变化的候选。在这项研究中,我们的目的是确定最小临床重要差异的最低掩蔽水平。方法:对74例慢性耳鸣患者进行为期3个月的心理咨询与声音治疗相结合的耳鸣干预。在基线和3个月时测量最低掩蔽水平。临床总体印象在3个月时进行评估,以衡量参与者对耳鸣的自我感知的变化。通过锚定、效应大小、标准误差测量和受试者工作特征曲线分析计算最小掩蔽水平的最小临床重要差异。结果:最小掩蔽水平的最小临床重要差异分析从受试者工作特征曲线得到-5.5 dB SL,从标准误差测量得到-8.1 dB SL,从效应大小得到-9.2 dB SL,从锚定分析得到-10.3 dB SL。其中,经优化敏感性(0.704)和特异性(0.957)的最小临床重要差异值为-5.5 dB SL,由受试者工作特征分析确定。结论:提出的最小临床重要差异值最小掩蔽水平(-5.5 dB SL)提供了良好的敏感性和特异性。因此,最小掩蔽水平可能是测量耳鸣感知变化的另一种选择。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28156229。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying Tinnitus Perception Improvement: Deriving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Minimum Masking Level.

Purpose: Tools that can reliably measure changes in the perception of tinnitus following interventions are lacking. The minimum masking level, defined as the lowest level at which tinnitus is completely masked, is a candidate for quantifying changes in tinnitus perception. In this study, we aimed to determine minimal clinically important differences for minimum masking level.

Method: A 3-month tinnitus intervention combining counseling and sound therapy was conducted in 74 participants with chronic tinnitus. Minimum masking levels were measured at baseline and 3 months. The clinical global impression was evaluated at 3 months to measure changes in participants' self-perception of tinnitus. The minimal clinically important difference of the minimum masking level was calculated using anchored-based, effect size, standard error measurement, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: The minimal clinically important difference analysis of the minimum masking level yielded a -5.5 dB SL from the receiver operating characteristic curve, a -8.1 dB SL from the standard error measurement, a -9.2 dB SL from the effect size, and a -10.3 dB SL from the anchor-based analysis. Of these, the minimal clinically important difference value with optimized sensitivity (.704) and specificity (.957) was a -5.5 dB SL, determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Conclusions: The proposed minimal clinically important difference value of the minimum masking level (-5.5 dB SL) provides a good level of sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the minimum masking level may be an alternative for measuring changes in tinnitus perception.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28156229.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信