基于流固耦合的主动脉内双球囊泵血流动力学评价。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Hongchao Ma, Yuhan Wang, Bin Gao, Shu Li, Zhiming Song, Yu Chang, Ran Zhang
{"title":"基于流固耦合的主动脉内双球囊泵血流动力学评价。","authors":"Hongchao Ma, Yuhan Wang, Bin Gao, Shu Li, Zhiming Song, Yu Chang, Ran Zhang","doi":"10.1002/cnm.3899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a widely-used mechanical circulatory support device that enhances hemodynamics in patients with heart conditions. Although the IABP is a common clinical tool, its effectiveness in enhancing outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock remains disputed. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of intra-aortic dual-balloon pump (IADBP) and its impact on aortic hemodynamics compared with an IABP. Three-dimensional finite element models were constructed for the aorta, IABP, and IADBP, followed by numerical simulation using the fluid-structure coupling (FSI) method. Three simulations were conducted: Heart failure patients without assistive devices (Case A), those with IABP (Case B), and those with IADBP (Case C). The study assessed the IADBP's hemodynamic effects by measuring aortic branch blood flow, left ventricular afterload, aortic wall stress, and wall shear stress. IADBP outperformed IABP in enhancing blood flow to the coronary arteries, upper limbs, and brain vessels (left and right coronary arteries: 0.88 vs. 1.27, 1.27 vs. 1.99 mL/beat; brachiocephalic artery, left common carotid artery, and left subclavian artery: 6.08 vs. 12.39, 2.48 vs. 4.97, 2.31 vs. 5.08 mL/beat). IADBP also demonstrated superior performance in counterpulsation pressure and left ventricular ejection (counterpulsation phase: 97.41 mmHg vs. 110.03 mmHg; ventricular unloading phase: 72.21 mmHg vs. 66.46 mmHg). The use of IADBP elevates stress on the aortic wall and wall shear stress, potentially affecting vascular health. IADBP effectively addresses upper limb and cerebral hypoperfusion issues associated with IABP, demonstrating superior performance in enhancing counterpulsation pressure and left ventricular ejection. Despite potential vascular biomechanical effects, IADBP provide a promising clinical treatment option. Further studies are needed to refine IADBP 's design and evaluate its long-term clinical efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"41 1","pages":"e3899"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodynamic Evaluation of Intra-Aortic Dual-Balloon Pump Based on Fluid-Structure Interaction.\",\"authors\":\"Hongchao Ma, Yuhan Wang, Bin Gao, Shu Li, Zhiming Song, Yu Chang, Ran Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnm.3899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a widely-used mechanical circulatory support device that enhances hemodynamics in patients with heart conditions. Although the IABP is a common clinical tool, its effectiveness in enhancing outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock remains disputed. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of intra-aortic dual-balloon pump (IADBP) and its impact on aortic hemodynamics compared with an IABP. Three-dimensional finite element models were constructed for the aorta, IABP, and IADBP, followed by numerical simulation using the fluid-structure coupling (FSI) method. Three simulations were conducted: Heart failure patients without assistive devices (Case A), those with IABP (Case B), and those with IADBP (Case C). The study assessed the IADBP's hemodynamic effects by measuring aortic branch blood flow, left ventricular afterload, aortic wall stress, and wall shear stress. IADBP outperformed IABP in enhancing blood flow to the coronary arteries, upper limbs, and brain vessels (left and right coronary arteries: 0.88 vs. 1.27, 1.27 vs. 1.99 mL/beat; brachiocephalic artery, left common carotid artery, and left subclavian artery: 6.08 vs. 12.39, 2.48 vs. 4.97, 2.31 vs. 5.08 mL/beat). IADBP also demonstrated superior performance in counterpulsation pressure and left ventricular ejection (counterpulsation phase: 97.41 mmHg vs. 110.03 mmHg; ventricular unloading phase: 72.21 mmHg vs. 66.46 mmHg). The use of IADBP elevates stress on the aortic wall and wall shear stress, potentially affecting vascular health. IADBP effectively addresses upper limb and cerebral hypoperfusion issues associated with IABP, demonstrating superior performance in enhancing counterpulsation pressure and left ventricular ejection. Despite potential vascular biomechanical effects, IADBP provide a promising clinical treatment option. Further studies are needed to refine IADBP 's design and evaluate its long-term clinical efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"e3899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3899\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3899","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)是一种广泛使用的机械循环支持装置,可增强心脏病患者的血液动力学。尽管IABP是一种常见的临床工具,但其在提高急性心肌梗死和心源性休克患者预后方面的有效性仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估主动脉内双球囊泵(IADBP)的有效性及其与IABP相比对主动脉血流动力学的影响。建立主动脉、IABP和IADBP的三维有限元模型,采用流固耦合(FSI)方法进行数值模拟。进行了三种模拟:无辅助装置的心力衰竭患者(病例A)、IABP患者(病例B)和IADBP患者(病例C)。研究通过测量主动脉分支血流、左心室后负荷、主动脉壁应力和壁剪切应力来评估IADBP对血流动力学的影响。IADBP在增强冠状动脉、上肢和脑血管的血流量方面优于IABP(左和右冠状动脉:0.88 vs. 1.27, 1.27 vs. 1.99 mL/次;头臂动脉、左颈总动脉、左锁骨下动脉:6.08 vs. 12.39、2.48 vs. 4.97、2.31 vs. 5.08 mL/次)。IADBP在反搏压和左心室射血方面也表现出优异的性能(反搏期:97.41 mmHg vs. 110.03 mmHg;心室卸荷期:72.21 mmHg vs. 66.46 mmHg)。IADBP的使用增加了对主动脉壁的应力和壁剪切应力,可能影响血管健康。IADBP有效地解决了与IABP相关的上肢和脑灌注不足问题,在提高反搏压和左心室射血方面表现优异。尽管存在潜在的血管生物力学效应,IADBP仍是一种有前景的临床治疗选择。需要进一步的研究来完善IADBP的设计并评估其长期临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hemodynamic Evaluation of Intra-Aortic Dual-Balloon Pump Based on Fluid-Structure Interaction.

The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a widely-used mechanical circulatory support device that enhances hemodynamics in patients with heart conditions. Although the IABP is a common clinical tool, its effectiveness in enhancing outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock remains disputed. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of intra-aortic dual-balloon pump (IADBP) and its impact on aortic hemodynamics compared with an IABP. Three-dimensional finite element models were constructed for the aorta, IABP, and IADBP, followed by numerical simulation using the fluid-structure coupling (FSI) method. Three simulations were conducted: Heart failure patients without assistive devices (Case A), those with IABP (Case B), and those with IADBP (Case C). The study assessed the IADBP's hemodynamic effects by measuring aortic branch blood flow, left ventricular afterload, aortic wall stress, and wall shear stress. IADBP outperformed IABP in enhancing blood flow to the coronary arteries, upper limbs, and brain vessels (left and right coronary arteries: 0.88 vs. 1.27, 1.27 vs. 1.99 mL/beat; brachiocephalic artery, left common carotid artery, and left subclavian artery: 6.08 vs. 12.39, 2.48 vs. 4.97, 2.31 vs. 5.08 mL/beat). IADBP also demonstrated superior performance in counterpulsation pressure and left ventricular ejection (counterpulsation phase: 97.41 mmHg vs. 110.03 mmHg; ventricular unloading phase: 72.21 mmHg vs. 66.46 mmHg). The use of IADBP elevates stress on the aortic wall and wall shear stress, potentially affecting vascular health. IADBP effectively addresses upper limb and cerebral hypoperfusion issues associated with IABP, demonstrating superior performance in enhancing counterpulsation pressure and left ventricular ejection. Despite potential vascular biomechanical effects, IADBP provide a promising clinical treatment option. Further studies are needed to refine IADBP 's design and evaluate its long-term clinical efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信