Seyong Chung, Tae-Hoon Kim, Torri Schwartz, Torsten Kayser, Kazutaka Aonuma
{"title":"植入心脏电子装置的心力衰竭患者的早期加速出院和临床结果——来自一项多中心队列研究的亚分析","authors":"Seyong Chung, Tae-Hoon Kim, Torri Schwartz, Torsten Kayser, Kazutaka Aonuma","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have demonstrated that a shorter hospital stay reduces adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF), primarily in observational study settings. This trend was further emphasized during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in case-control study-like results.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A subanalysis was conducted on 239 patients from a Japanese multicenter cohort study (HINODE), encompassing 32 months before and 6 months after pandemic onset. The duration of hospitalization and clinical outcomes were compared between these 2 periods in HF patients who received guideline-directed medical and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. The duration of HF hospitalization was significantly shortened by 41.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.7-62.8%) during the pandemic period (median 13 days; interquartile range [IQR] 6-19 days) compared with the prepandemic period (median 21 days; IQR 12-38 days). Nonetheless, the incidence rate (IR) of outcomes in the pandemic group was similar (ventricular arrhythmia, HF events, HF and cardiac hospitalization) or lower (all-cause hospitalization [IR ratio 0.6; 95% CI 0.4-1.0]) compared with the prepandemic group. The odds ratio of adverse events was also similar between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant reduction in hospitalization duration during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with similar or improved clinical outcomes for guideline-adherent HF patients. Current hospitalization durations for advanced HF patients are likely unnecessarily long, and efforts to reduce them are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerated Early Discharge and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices - Subanalysis From a Multicenter Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Seyong Chung, Tae-Hoon Kim, Torri Schwartz, Torsten Kayser, Kazutaka Aonuma\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have demonstrated that a shorter hospital stay reduces adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF), primarily in observational study settings. This trend was further emphasized during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in case-control study-like results.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A subanalysis was conducted on 239 patients from a Japanese multicenter cohort study (HINODE), encompassing 32 months before and 6 months after pandemic onset. The duration of hospitalization and clinical outcomes were compared between these 2 periods in HF patients who received guideline-directed medical and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. The duration of HF hospitalization was significantly shortened by 41.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.7-62.8%) during the pandemic period (median 13 days; interquartile range [IQR] 6-19 days) compared with the prepandemic period (median 21 days; IQR 12-38 days). Nonetheless, the incidence rate (IR) of outcomes in the pandemic group was similar (ventricular arrhythmia, HF events, HF and cardiac hospitalization) or lower (all-cause hospitalization [IR ratio 0.6; 95% CI 0.4-1.0]) compared with the prepandemic group. The odds ratio of adverse events was also similar between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant reduction in hospitalization duration during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with similar or improved clinical outcomes for guideline-adherent HF patients. Current hospitalization durations for advanced HF patients are likely unnecessarily long, and efforts to reduce them are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0675\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:先前的研究表明,较短的住院时间可以减少心力衰竭(HF)的不良后果,主要是在观察性研究中。这一趋势在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间得到进一步强调,并产生了类似病例对照研究的结果。方法和结果:对来自日本多中心队列研究(HINODE)的239例患者进行了亚分析,包括大流行发病前32个月和发病后6个月。比较接受指导药物治疗和心脏植入式电子装置(CIED)治疗的HF患者住院时间和临床结果。在大流行期间,HF住院时间显著缩短了41.1%(95%可信区间[CI] 6.7-62.8%)(中位数为13天;四分位数间距[IQR] 6-19天)与大流行前时期(中位数21天;(12-38天)。尽管如此,大流行组的结局发生率(IR)相似(室性心律失常、心衰事件、心衰和心脏住院)或更低(全因住院[IR比0.6;95% CI 0.4-1.0])与大流行前组相比。两组不良事件的优势比也相似。结论:COVID-19大流行期间住院时间的显著减少与遵循指南的HF患者相似或改善的临床结果相关。目前晚期心衰患者的住院时间可能不必要地长,有必要努力减少住院时间。
Accelerated Early Discharge and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices - Subanalysis From a Multicenter Cohort Study.
Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that a shorter hospital stay reduces adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF), primarily in observational study settings. This trend was further emphasized during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in case-control study-like results.
Methods and results: A subanalysis was conducted on 239 patients from a Japanese multicenter cohort study (HINODE), encompassing 32 months before and 6 months after pandemic onset. The duration of hospitalization and clinical outcomes were compared between these 2 periods in HF patients who received guideline-directed medical and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. The duration of HF hospitalization was significantly shortened by 41.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.7-62.8%) during the pandemic period (median 13 days; interquartile range [IQR] 6-19 days) compared with the prepandemic period (median 21 days; IQR 12-38 days). Nonetheless, the incidence rate (IR) of outcomes in the pandemic group was similar (ventricular arrhythmia, HF events, HF and cardiac hospitalization) or lower (all-cause hospitalization [IR ratio 0.6; 95% CI 0.4-1.0]) compared with the prepandemic group. The odds ratio of adverse events was also similar between the 2 groups.
Conclusions: A significant reduction in hospitalization duration during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with similar or improved clinical outcomes for guideline-adherent HF patients. Current hospitalization durations for advanced HF patients are likely unnecessarily long, and efforts to reduce them are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.