Chaonong Lu, Shuang Wang, Shanshan Li, Ruikang Liu, Qiaoling Liu
{"title":"非营养性吸吮对早产儿吸吮表现的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Chaonong Lu, Shuang Wang, Shanshan Li, Ruikang Liu, Qiaoling Liu","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2025.2451405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-nutritive sucking (NNS) is commonly employed to assist in the development of preterm infants facing feeding challenges. The effectiveness of NNS interventions on sucking performance (suction and expression/compression component of sucking) in this population has not yet to be systematically explored.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To review the literature on the effects of NNS on sucking performance in preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases, encompassing publications from the inception of these databases until July 2024. The studies included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving preterm infants born before 37 wk with feeding problems, who were tube-fed. The experimental group received exclusive NNS intervention, while the control group received routine care or no intervention. Data extraction focused on one primary outcome (sucking performance) and two secondary outcomes (physiological characteristics and weight gain at discharge). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, while the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was employed to evaluate the risk of bias. The findings were summarized using a narrative synthesis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs involving a total of 575 preterm infants were incorporated. The methodological quality scores of the included studies ranged from 5 to 8. Compared to standard care, the use of NNS had positive influences on the Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children (LATCH) scale, aspects of sucking parameters (the percentage of milk taken and number of sucks per burst), and physiological characteristics. However, NNS produced variable results on the Preterm Infant Breastfeeding Behavior Scale (PIBBS), weight gain at discharge, and four sucking parameters-volume of milk intake at the first 5 min, rate of milk transfer, overall milk intake, and feeding time. Notably, insignificant association was found between NNS and other sucking parameters, including overall frequency, suction amplitude, and expression amplitude.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effectiveness of NNS intervention on sucking performance, weight at discharge yielded inconsistent results. However, the existing evidence that elucidated the impact mechanism of NNS and its effects on sucking performance was constrained. Additional trials characterized by robust methodological quality should be employed to further elucidate and clarify the potential impact mechanism of NNS on sucking performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Sucking Performance in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Chaonong Lu, Shuang Wang, Shanshan Li, Ruikang Liu, Qiaoling Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01942638.2025.2451405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-nutritive sucking (NNS) is commonly employed to assist in the development of preterm infants facing feeding challenges. The effectiveness of NNS interventions on sucking performance (suction and expression/compression component of sucking) in this population has not yet to be systematically explored.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To review the literature on the effects of NNS on sucking performance in preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases, encompassing publications from the inception of these databases until July 2024. The studies included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving preterm infants born before 37 wk with feeding problems, who were tube-fed. The experimental group received exclusive NNS intervention, while the control group received routine care or no intervention. Data extraction focused on one primary outcome (sucking performance) and two secondary outcomes (physiological characteristics and weight gain at discharge). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, while the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was employed to evaluate the risk of bias. The findings were summarized using a narrative synthesis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs involving a total of 575 preterm infants were incorporated. The methodological quality scores of the included studies ranged from 5 to 8. Compared to standard care, the use of NNS had positive influences on the Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children (LATCH) scale, aspects of sucking parameters (the percentage of milk taken and number of sucks per burst), and physiological characteristics. However, NNS produced variable results on the Preterm Infant Breastfeeding Behavior Scale (PIBBS), weight gain at discharge, and four sucking parameters-volume of milk intake at the first 5 min, rate of milk transfer, overall milk intake, and feeding time. Notably, insignificant association was found between NNS and other sucking parameters, including overall frequency, suction amplitude, and expression amplitude.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effectiveness of NNS intervention on sucking performance, weight at discharge yielded inconsistent results. However, the existing evidence that elucidated the impact mechanism of NNS and its effects on sucking performance was constrained. Additional trials characterized by robust methodological quality should be employed to further elucidate and clarify the potential impact mechanism of NNS on sucking performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2451405\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2451405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Sucking Performance in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.
Introduction: Non-nutritive sucking (NNS) is commonly employed to assist in the development of preterm infants facing feeding challenges. The effectiveness of NNS interventions on sucking performance (suction and expression/compression component of sucking) in this population has not yet to be systematically explored.
Aims: To review the literature on the effects of NNS on sucking performance in preterm infants.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases, encompassing publications from the inception of these databases until July 2024. The studies included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving preterm infants born before 37 wk with feeding problems, who were tube-fed. The experimental group received exclusive NNS intervention, while the control group received routine care or no intervention. Data extraction focused on one primary outcome (sucking performance) and two secondary outcomes (physiological characteristics and weight gain at discharge). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, while the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was employed to evaluate the risk of bias. The findings were summarized using a narrative synthesis approach.
Results: Nine RCTs involving a total of 575 preterm infants were incorporated. The methodological quality scores of the included studies ranged from 5 to 8. Compared to standard care, the use of NNS had positive influences on the Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children (LATCH) scale, aspects of sucking parameters (the percentage of milk taken and number of sucks per burst), and physiological characteristics. However, NNS produced variable results on the Preterm Infant Breastfeeding Behavior Scale (PIBBS), weight gain at discharge, and four sucking parameters-volume of milk intake at the first 5 min, rate of milk transfer, overall milk intake, and feeding time. Notably, insignificant association was found between NNS and other sucking parameters, including overall frequency, suction amplitude, and expression amplitude.
Conclusions: The effectiveness of NNS intervention on sucking performance, weight at discharge yielded inconsistent results. However, the existing evidence that elucidated the impact mechanism of NNS and its effects on sucking performance was constrained. Additional trials characterized by robust methodological quality should be employed to further elucidate and clarify the potential impact mechanism of NNS on sucking performance.
期刊介绍:
5 issues per year
Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine