{"title":"医学教育中的跨专业教学:提高临床问题解决能力和跨专业协作能力。","authors":"Peiwen Yang, Ting Xiong, Xiyuan Dong, Shulin Yang, Jing Yue","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2451269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interprofessional teaching rounds are a practical application of interprofessional education in bedside teaching, yet there is a lack of research on how interprofessional teaching rounds should be implemented into medical education. This study aimed to describe our experience in developing and implementing interprofessional teaching rounds during a clerkship rotation for medical students, and compares its strengths and weaknesses relative to traditional teaching rounds. Medical students were assigned to either the interprofessional teaching round group (<i>n</i> = 24) or the traditional teaching round group (<i>n</i> = 25), and each group participated in their assigned type of teaching round. A quiz including medical knowledge of gynecological and obstetric diseases was used to assess the students' diagnostic and treatment abilities after teaching rounds. Additionally, a survey was conducted among students to evaluate whether the interprofessional teaching rounds were helpful. The results showed that when using interprofessional teaching rounds, the test score for medical knowledge related to the diagnosis and treatment of gynecological and obstetric diseases was significantly higher than the traditional teaching round group (85.5 ± 11.2 vs 78.3 ± 12.5, <i>p</i> = 0.038). Additionally, the interprofessional teaching rounds significantly enhanced understanding of clinical application, identification, and appropriate problem-solving in cases, as well as examination of different disciplinary aspects of a case, and improvement of interdisciplinary collaboration skills compared to traditional teaching rounds. Our study demonstrates that interprofessional teaching rounds can serve as an effective teaching method for enhancing medical students' ability to collaborate interprofessionally and to solve clinical problems comprehensively.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2451269"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interprofessional teaching rounds in medical education: improving clinical problem-solving ability and interprofessional collaboration skills.\",\"authors\":\"Peiwen Yang, Ting Xiong, Xiyuan Dong, Shulin Yang, Jing Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10872981.2025.2451269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Interprofessional teaching rounds are a practical application of interprofessional education in bedside teaching, yet there is a lack of research on how interprofessional teaching rounds should be implemented into medical education. This study aimed to describe our experience in developing and implementing interprofessional teaching rounds during a clerkship rotation for medical students, and compares its strengths and weaknesses relative to traditional teaching rounds. Medical students were assigned to either the interprofessional teaching round group (<i>n</i> = 24) or the traditional teaching round group (<i>n</i> = 25), and each group participated in their assigned type of teaching round. A quiz including medical knowledge of gynecological and obstetric diseases was used to assess the students' diagnostic and treatment abilities after teaching rounds. Additionally, a survey was conducted among students to evaluate whether the interprofessional teaching rounds were helpful. The results showed that when using interprofessional teaching rounds, the test score for medical knowledge related to the diagnosis and treatment of gynecological and obstetric diseases was significantly higher than the traditional teaching round group (85.5 ± 11.2 vs 78.3 ± 12.5, <i>p</i> = 0.038). Additionally, the interprofessional teaching rounds significantly enhanced understanding of clinical application, identification, and appropriate problem-solving in cases, as well as examination of different disciplinary aspects of a case, and improvement of interdisciplinary collaboration skills compared to traditional teaching rounds. Our study demonstrates that interprofessional teaching rounds can serve as an effective teaching method for enhancing medical students' ability to collaborate interprofessionally and to solve clinical problems comprehensively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"2451269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2451269\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2451269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
跨专业教学查房是跨专业教育在床边教学中的实际应用,但如何在医学教育中实施跨专业教学查房,目前还缺乏研究。本研究旨在描述我们在医学生见习轮转期间制定和实施跨专业教学轮转的经验,并比较其相对于传统教学轮转的优缺点。将医学生分为跨专业教学轮次组(n = 24)和传统教学轮次组(n = 25),每组参加各自指定类型的教学轮次。通过对妇产科疾病医学知识的测试,评估学生在查房后的诊断和治疗能力。此外,我们还对学生进行了调查,以评估跨专业教学是否有帮助。结果显示,采用跨专业教学轮次时,妇产疾病诊疗相关医学知识得分明显高于传统教学轮次组(85.5±11.2 vs 78.3±12.5,p = 0.038)。此外,与传统的教学轮次相比,跨专业教学轮次显著提高了对临床应用、病例识别和适当解决问题的理解,以及对病例不同学科方面的检查,并提高了跨学科合作技能。本研究表明,跨专业教学查房是提高医学生跨专业协作能力和综合解决临床问题能力的有效教学方法。
Interprofessional teaching rounds in medical education: improving clinical problem-solving ability and interprofessional collaboration skills.
Interprofessional teaching rounds are a practical application of interprofessional education in bedside teaching, yet there is a lack of research on how interprofessional teaching rounds should be implemented into medical education. This study aimed to describe our experience in developing and implementing interprofessional teaching rounds during a clerkship rotation for medical students, and compares its strengths and weaknesses relative to traditional teaching rounds. Medical students were assigned to either the interprofessional teaching round group (n = 24) or the traditional teaching round group (n = 25), and each group participated in their assigned type of teaching round. A quiz including medical knowledge of gynecological and obstetric diseases was used to assess the students' diagnostic and treatment abilities after teaching rounds. Additionally, a survey was conducted among students to evaluate whether the interprofessional teaching rounds were helpful. The results showed that when using interprofessional teaching rounds, the test score for medical knowledge related to the diagnosis and treatment of gynecological and obstetric diseases was significantly higher than the traditional teaching round group (85.5 ± 11.2 vs 78.3 ± 12.5, p = 0.038). Additionally, the interprofessional teaching rounds significantly enhanced understanding of clinical application, identification, and appropriate problem-solving in cases, as well as examination of different disciplinary aspects of a case, and improvement of interdisciplinary collaboration skills compared to traditional teaching rounds. Our study demonstrates that interprofessional teaching rounds can serve as an effective teaching method for enhancing medical students' ability to collaborate interprofessionally and to solve clinical problems comprehensively.
期刊介绍:
Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends.
Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to:
-Basic science education
-Clinical science education
-Residency education
-Learning theory
-Problem-based learning (PBL)
-Curriculum development
-Research design and statistics
-Measurement and evaluation
-Faculty development
-Informatics/web