一所中东大学本科健康科学与其他学科学生偏好学习方式与学业成绩之关系

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S491487
Shobana Gangadharan, Khamis Al Mezeini, Sumathi Sasikala Gnanamuthu, Khadija A Al Marshoudi
{"title":"一所中东大学本科健康科学与其他学科学生偏好学习方式与学业成绩之关系","authors":"Shobana Gangadharan, Khamis Al Mezeini, Sumathi Sasikala Gnanamuthu, Khadija A Al Marshoudi","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S491487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Learning style denotes a learner's approach to acquiring, processing, interpreting, organizing, and contemplating information. VARK, formulated by Fleming and Mills (1992), assesses learning styles: Visual (V), Aural (A), Reading/Writing (R), and Kinesthetic (K). Visual learners prefer observing; Aural learners favor listening to lectures; Reading/Writing learners engage through texts and notes; Kinesthetic learners benefit from tactile activities.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare learning style preferences of undergraduate health sciences students with other disciplines and examine the relationship between VARK scores and academic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of 347 undergraduate students recorded demographic data and responses to the Arabic version of the VARK questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 which included descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unimodal preferences were most common, ranging from 47.4% to 51.4% in the College of Health Sciences and 11.8% to 15.0% in the College of Law as the least. Quadmodal preferences were rare but more frequent in Health Sciences and Engineering. Auditory (A) was the most preferred unimodal style (Mean/SD - 3.72/2.181), while kinesthetic (Mean/SD - 0.54/.864) was the least preferred. Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test results indicated Health Sciences students scored higher in K (<i>Z</i> = -4.558, p<0.001) and total VARK scores (<i>Z</i> = -3.633, p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in CGPA between unimodal and multimodal learners (<i>Z</i> = -2.150, p=0.032), with unimodal learners ranking lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that multimodal learners outperformed unimodal learners, even though unimodal learners constituted a larger group. The Health Sciences and Engineering students exhibited marginally higher Quadmodal learning preferences than other disciplines, indicating the need for comprehensive and engaging learning experiences. These results have practical implications for educators, who should consider learning styles to enhance teaching strategies, address unique student challenges, and create an inclusive educational environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"13-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Preferred Learning Styles and Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Health Sciences Students Compared to Other Disciplines at a Middle Eastern University Utilizing the VARK Instrument.\",\"authors\":\"Shobana Gangadharan, Khamis Al Mezeini, Sumathi Sasikala Gnanamuthu, Khadija A Al Marshoudi\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S491487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Learning style denotes a learner's approach to acquiring, processing, interpreting, organizing, and contemplating information. VARK, formulated by Fleming and Mills (1992), assesses learning styles: Visual (V), Aural (A), Reading/Writing (R), and Kinesthetic (K). Visual learners prefer observing; Aural learners favor listening to lectures; Reading/Writing learners engage through texts and notes; Kinesthetic learners benefit from tactile activities.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare learning style preferences of undergraduate health sciences students with other disciplines and examine the relationship between VARK scores and academic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of 347 undergraduate students recorded demographic data and responses to the Arabic version of the VARK questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 which included descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unimodal preferences were most common, ranging from 47.4% to 51.4% in the College of Health Sciences and 11.8% to 15.0% in the College of Law as the least. Quadmodal preferences were rare but more frequent in Health Sciences and Engineering. Auditory (A) was the most preferred unimodal style (Mean/SD - 3.72/2.181), while kinesthetic (Mean/SD - 0.54/.864) was the least preferred. Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test results indicated Health Sciences students scored higher in K (<i>Z</i> = -4.558, p<0.001) and total VARK scores (<i>Z</i> = -3.633, p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in CGPA between unimodal and multimodal learners (<i>Z</i> = -2.150, p=0.032), with unimodal learners ranking lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that multimodal learners outperformed unimodal learners, even though unimodal learners constituted a larger group. The Health Sciences and Engineering students exhibited marginally higher Quadmodal learning preferences than other disciplines, indicating the need for comprehensive and engaging learning experiences. These results have practical implications for educators, who should consider learning styles to enhance teaching strategies, address unique student challenges, and create an inclusive educational environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"13-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745043/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S491487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S491487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习风格是指学习者获取、处理、解释、组织和思考信息的方式。VARK由Fleming和Mills(1992)提出,评估学习风格:视觉(V)、听觉(A)、阅读/写作(R)和动觉(K)。视觉学习者更喜欢观察;听觉型学习者喜欢听讲座;阅读/写作学习者通过课文和笔记进行学习;动觉型学习者受益于触觉活动。目的:比较健康科学本科学生与其他学科学生的学习风格偏好,并探讨VARK分数与学业成绩的关系。方法:对347名大学生进行横断面研究,记录人口统计数据并填写阿拉伯语版VARK问卷。数据分析采用SPSS第27版,包括描述性统计和推理统计。结果:单式偏好最为普遍,卫生科学学院为47.4% ~ 51.4%,法学院为11.8% ~ 15.0%。四模态偏好很少见,但在健康科学和工程领域更为常见。听觉(A)是最受欢迎的单峰风格(Mean/SD - 3.72/2.181),而动觉(Mean/SD - 0.54/.864)是最不受欢迎的。曼-惠特尼u检验结果显示,健康科学学生在K方面得分较高(Z = -4.558, pZ = -3.633, pZ = -2.150, p=0.032),单模学习者排名较低。结论:研究结果表明,尽管单模态学习者构成了一个更大的群体,但多模态学习者的表现优于单模态学习者。健康科学与工程专业的学生比其他学科的学生表现出略高的四模态学习偏好,这表明需要全面和引人入胜的学习体验。这些结果对教育工作者具有实际意义,他们应该考虑学习风格,以提高教学策略,解决独特的学生挑战,并创造一个包容性的教育环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relationship Between Preferred Learning Styles and Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Health Sciences Students Compared to Other Disciplines at a Middle Eastern University Utilizing the VARK Instrument.

Introduction: Learning style denotes a learner's approach to acquiring, processing, interpreting, organizing, and contemplating information. VARK, formulated by Fleming and Mills (1992), assesses learning styles: Visual (V), Aural (A), Reading/Writing (R), and Kinesthetic (K). Visual learners prefer observing; Aural learners favor listening to lectures; Reading/Writing learners engage through texts and notes; Kinesthetic learners benefit from tactile activities.

Purpose: To compare learning style preferences of undergraduate health sciences students with other disciplines and examine the relationship between VARK scores and academic performance.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of 347 undergraduate students recorded demographic data and responses to the Arabic version of the VARK questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 which included descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: Unimodal preferences were most common, ranging from 47.4% to 51.4% in the College of Health Sciences and 11.8% to 15.0% in the College of Law as the least. Quadmodal preferences were rare but more frequent in Health Sciences and Engineering. Auditory (A) was the most preferred unimodal style (Mean/SD - 3.72/2.181), while kinesthetic (Mean/SD - 0.54/.864) was the least preferred. Mann-Whitney U-test results indicated Health Sciences students scored higher in K (Z = -4.558, p<0.001) and total VARK scores (Z = -3.633, p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in CGPA between unimodal and multimodal learners (Z = -2.150, p=0.032), with unimodal learners ranking lower.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that multimodal learners outperformed unimodal learners, even though unimodal learners constituted a larger group. The Health Sciences and Engineering students exhibited marginally higher Quadmodal learning preferences than other disciplines, indicating the need for comprehensive and engaging learning experiences. These results have practical implications for educators, who should consider learning styles to enhance teaching strategies, address unique student challenges, and create an inclusive educational environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信