{"title":"雷马唑仑和咪达唑仑在镇静上消化道内镜检查中的比较研究:倾向评分匹配分析。","authors":"Ryoji Ichijima, Hisatomo Ikehara, Tomomi Sugita, Daisuke Yamaguchi, Yasuhiko Nagata, Kanako Ogura, Mitsuru Esaki, Yosuke Minoda, Hiroyuki Ono, Yuki Maeda, Shinsuke Kiriyama, Tetsuya Sumiyoshi, Yuichi Kanmura","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the use of remimazolam and midazolam in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Japan as a sub-analysis of data from an investigator-initiated clinical trial of remimazolam.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients in two groups were matched using propensity score matching. We evaluated the time from the end of the gastrointestinal endoscopy until discharge, the time from the end of the procedure until awakening, and adverse events. Overall, 36 participants from the clinical trial population who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using remimazolam and 199 patients who underwent the procedure with midazolam during the same period were included in this study. Following propensity score matching, 34 patients in both groups were matched. The median time from the end of the procedure until awakening was 27.0 min (23.0-40.5 min) in the midazolam group (Group M) and 0 min (0-5.0 min) in the remimazolam group (Group R); the median time from the end of the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy until discharge was 39.0 min (35.0-52.5 min) in Group M and 5.0 min (0-5.0 min) in Group R (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Reported adverse events were hypotension and hypoxemia in one patient in Group R.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with midazolam, remimazolam significantly shortened the time to patient awakening and duration until the patient could leave the endoscopy room. <b>Trial Registration:</b> The main study (REM-IICT JP1) is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trails: jRCT2031200360.</p>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Remimazolam and Midazolam During Sedated Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ryoji Ichijima, Hisatomo Ikehara, Tomomi Sugita, Daisuke Yamaguchi, Yasuhiko Nagata, Kanako Ogura, Mitsuru Esaki, Yosuke Minoda, Hiroyuki Ono, Yuki Maeda, Shinsuke Kiriyama, Tetsuya Sumiyoshi, Yuichi Kanmura\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the use of remimazolam and midazolam in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Japan as a sub-analysis of data from an investigator-initiated clinical trial of remimazolam.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients in two groups were matched using propensity score matching. We evaluated the time from the end of the gastrointestinal endoscopy until discharge, the time from the end of the procedure until awakening, and adverse events. Overall, 36 participants from the clinical trial population who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using remimazolam and 199 patients who underwent the procedure with midazolam during the same period were included in this study. Following propensity score matching, 34 patients in both groups were matched. The median time from the end of the procedure until awakening was 27.0 min (23.0-40.5 min) in the midazolam group (Group M) and 0 min (0-5.0 min) in the remimazolam group (Group R); the median time from the end of the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy until discharge was 39.0 min (35.0-52.5 min) in Group M and 5.0 min (0-5.0 min) in Group R (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Reported adverse events were hypotension and hypoxemia in one patient in Group R.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with midazolam, remimazolam significantly shortened the time to patient awakening and duration until the patient could leave the endoscopy room. <b>Trial Registration:</b> The main study (REM-IICT JP1) is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trails: jRCT2031200360.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e70100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744072/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在比较雷马唑仑和咪达唑仑在日本上消化道内窥镜检查中的使用,作为一项研究人员发起的雷马唑仑临床试验数据的亚分析。方法与结果:采用倾向评分法对两组患者进行匹配。我们评估了从胃肠内镜检查结束到出院的时间,从手术结束到苏醒的时间,以及不良事件。总体而言,来自临床试验人群的36名使用雷马唑仑进行上消化道内窥镜检查的参与者和199名在同一时期使用咪达唑仑进行手术的患者被纳入本研究。倾向评分匹配后,两组34例患者进行匹配。咪达唑仑组(M组)从手术结束到苏醒的中位时间为27.0 min (23.0 ~ 40.5 min),雷马唑仑组(R组)为0 min (0 ~ 5.0 min);从上消化道内镜检查结束到出院的中位时间M组为39.0 min (35.0 ~ 52.5 min), R组为5.0 min (0 ~ 5.0 min) (p)。结论:与咪达唑仑相比,雷马唑仑显著缩短了患者苏醒时间和患者离开内镜室的时间。试验注册:主要研究(REM-IICT JP1)在日本临床试验注册中心注册:jRCT2031200360。
Comparative Study of Remimazolam and Midazolam During Sedated Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Aim: This study aimed to compare the use of remimazolam and midazolam in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Japan as a sub-analysis of data from an investigator-initiated clinical trial of remimazolam.
Methods and results: Patients in two groups were matched using propensity score matching. We evaluated the time from the end of the gastrointestinal endoscopy until discharge, the time from the end of the procedure until awakening, and adverse events. Overall, 36 participants from the clinical trial population who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using remimazolam and 199 patients who underwent the procedure with midazolam during the same period were included in this study. Following propensity score matching, 34 patients in both groups were matched. The median time from the end of the procedure until awakening was 27.0 min (23.0-40.5 min) in the midazolam group (Group M) and 0 min (0-5.0 min) in the remimazolam group (Group R); the median time from the end of the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy until discharge was 39.0 min (35.0-52.5 min) in Group M and 5.0 min (0-5.0 min) in Group R (p < 0.01). Reported adverse events were hypotension and hypoxemia in one patient in Group R.
Conclusion: Compared with midazolam, remimazolam significantly shortened the time to patient awakening and duration until the patient could leave the endoscopy room. Trial Registration: The main study (REM-IICT JP1) is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trails: jRCT2031200360.