社会决定因素与人际自杀理论在双相情感障碍门诊患者研究中的整合。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Daniel J Mulligan, Alexis Taylor, Dorian A Lamis
{"title":"社会决定因素与人际自杀理论在双相情感障碍门诊患者研究中的整合。","authors":"Daniel J Mulligan, Alexis Taylor, Dorian A Lamis","doi":"10.1111/sltb.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bipolar disorder, socioeconomic deprivation, and social isolation are major risk factors for suicide. The interpersonal theory of suicide (IPTS) posits perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness as proximal causes of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, while the social determinants of health (SDOH) framework highlights distal socioeconomic factors. Studies of suicidality in bipolar disorder have used the IPTS and the SDOH framework, but few have integrated them to explore connections between distal and proximal factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness as mediators of the relationship between cumulative socioeconomic risk and suicide risk. Participants were 171 outpatients in a United States (U.S.) bipolar clinic (mean age = 39.0, 69.6% female, 73.7% Black/African American).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cumulative socioeconomic risk, perceived burdensomeness, and thwarted belongingness were positively associated with suicide risk. Perceived burdensomeness mediated the relationship between cumulative socioeconomic risk and suicide risk, but thwarted belongingness did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings broadly suggest the IPTS and the SDOH framework can be fruitfully integrated to guide research and prevent suicide. The pathway from cumulative socioeconomic risk to suicide risk via perceived burdensomeness warrants further attention, particularly for individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Implications for future studies of the IPTS, SDOH, and suicidality are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":"55 1","pages":"e70003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Social Determinants With the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide in a Study of Bipolar Outpatients.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J Mulligan, Alexis Taylor, Dorian A Lamis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sltb.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bipolar disorder, socioeconomic deprivation, and social isolation are major risk factors for suicide. The interpersonal theory of suicide (IPTS) posits perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness as proximal causes of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, while the social determinants of health (SDOH) framework highlights distal socioeconomic factors. Studies of suicidality in bipolar disorder have used the IPTS and the SDOH framework, but few have integrated them to explore connections between distal and proximal factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness as mediators of the relationship between cumulative socioeconomic risk and suicide risk. Participants were 171 outpatients in a United States (U.S.) bipolar clinic (mean age = 39.0, 69.6% female, 73.7% Black/African American).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cumulative socioeconomic risk, perceived burdensomeness, and thwarted belongingness were positively associated with suicide risk. Perceived burdensomeness mediated the relationship between cumulative socioeconomic risk and suicide risk, but thwarted belongingness did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings broadly suggest the IPTS and the SDOH framework can be fruitfully integrated to guide research and prevent suicide. The pathway from cumulative socioeconomic risk to suicide risk via perceived burdensomeness warrants further attention, particularly for individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Implications for future studies of the IPTS, SDOH, and suicidality are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"e70003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:双相情感障碍、社会经济剥夺和社会孤立是自杀的主要危险因素。人际自杀理论(IPTS)假设感知负担和受挫的归属感是自杀想法和行为的近端原因,而健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)框架强调远端社会经济因素。双相情感障碍自杀的研究已经使用了IPTS和SDOH框架,但很少有人将它们结合起来探索远端和近端因素之间的联系。方法:本研究考察了知觉负担和受挫归属感作为累积社会经济风险和自杀风险之间关系的中介。参与者是171名美国双相情感障碍门诊患者(平均年龄为39.0岁,69.6%为女性,73.7%为黑人/非裔美国人)。结果:累积的社会经济风险、感知负担和受挫的归属感与自杀风险呈正相关。感知负担在累积社会经济风险和自杀风险之间起中介作用,而受挫归属感没有。结论:研究结果广泛表明,IPTS和SDOH框架可以有效地结合起来指导研究和预防自杀。通过感知负担从累积社会经济风险到自杀风险的途径值得进一步关注,特别是对于诊断为双相情感障碍的个体。对未来研究IPTS、SDOH和自杀行为的意义进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Social Determinants With the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide in a Study of Bipolar Outpatients.

Introduction: Bipolar disorder, socioeconomic deprivation, and social isolation are major risk factors for suicide. The interpersonal theory of suicide (IPTS) posits perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness as proximal causes of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, while the social determinants of health (SDOH) framework highlights distal socioeconomic factors. Studies of suicidality in bipolar disorder have used the IPTS and the SDOH framework, but few have integrated them to explore connections between distal and proximal factors.

Methods: This study examined perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness as mediators of the relationship between cumulative socioeconomic risk and suicide risk. Participants were 171 outpatients in a United States (U.S.) bipolar clinic (mean age = 39.0, 69.6% female, 73.7% Black/African American).

Results: Cumulative socioeconomic risk, perceived burdensomeness, and thwarted belongingness were positively associated with suicide risk. Perceived burdensomeness mediated the relationship between cumulative socioeconomic risk and suicide risk, but thwarted belongingness did not.

Conclusion: Findings broadly suggest the IPTS and the SDOH framework can be fruitfully integrated to guide research and prevent suicide. The pathway from cumulative socioeconomic risk to suicide risk via perceived burdensomeness warrants further attention, particularly for individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Implications for future studies of the IPTS, SDOH, and suicidality are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信