以团队为基础的医师助理/副医师教育:一项混合范围审查。

Q2 Health Professions
Kirby Cranford, Annette Rauch, Rozalynd McConnaughy, Lawrence Herman
{"title":"以团队为基础的医师助理/副医师教育:一项混合范围审查。","authors":"Kirby Cranford, Annette Rauch, Rozalynd McConnaughy, Lawrence Herman","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Team-based learning (TBL) is a type of active learning. While TBL was first used in medical instruction at the start of the 2000s, its efficacy within the physician assistant (PA) education has yet to be demonstrated. The objective of this study was to determine existing information about TBL in PA education and to demonstrate the need for further study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed scoping review was undertaken. Articles were identified across the search engines CINAHL Complete, Embase, ERIC, and PubMed. Findings were then evaluated using Rayyan and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Forty-nine articles were identified across all databases, with 2 independent reviewers screening records. Ultimately, 6 studies were included. Four studies were original articles, and the other 2 were conference abstracts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the limited data available, TBL was generally beneficial in all available studies; however, results should be interpreted with caution given the paucity of available data. Studies included both hybrid curriculum and TBL alone. Studies demonstrated significant findings when evaluating TBL course outcomes, examination grades, and student confidence. All articles evaluated different outcomes, so comparison between results is challenging. The strength of research from conference abstracts was limited. Further study is necessary to determine if TBL is effective in other programs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>If demonstrated to be effective in PA education, TBL may be used to improve outcomes such as examination performance, course grades, long-term retention of knowledge, or student confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Team-Based Learning in Physician Assistant/Associate Education: A Mixed Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kirby Cranford, Annette Rauch, Rozalynd McConnaughy, Lawrence Herman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Team-based learning (TBL) is a type of active learning. While TBL was first used in medical instruction at the start of the 2000s, its efficacy within the physician assistant (PA) education has yet to be demonstrated. The objective of this study was to determine existing information about TBL in PA education and to demonstrate the need for further study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed scoping review was undertaken. Articles were identified across the search engines CINAHL Complete, Embase, ERIC, and PubMed. Findings were then evaluated using Rayyan and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Forty-nine articles were identified across all databases, with 2 independent reviewers screening records. Ultimately, 6 studies were included. Four studies were original articles, and the other 2 were conference abstracts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the limited data available, TBL was generally beneficial in all available studies; however, results should be interpreted with caution given the paucity of available data. Studies included both hybrid curriculum and TBL alone. Studies demonstrated significant findings when evaluating TBL course outcomes, examination grades, and student confidence. All articles evaluated different outcomes, so comparison between results is challenging. The strength of research from conference abstracts was limited. Further study is necessary to determine if TBL is effective in other programs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>If demonstrated to be effective in PA education, TBL may be used to improve outcomes such as examination performance, course grades, long-term retention of knowledge, or student confidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种主动学习。虽然TBL在21世纪初首次用于医学教学,但其在医师助理(PA)教育中的有效性尚未得到证实。本研究的目的是确定PA教育中关于TBL的现有信息,并证明进一步研究的必要性。方法:进行混合范围综述。文章通过搜索引擎CINAHL Complete、Embase、ERIC和PubMed进行识别。然后使用Rayyan和首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析指南。在所有数据库中确定了49篇文章,由2名独立审稿人筛选记录。最终纳入了6项研究。4项研究为原创文章,另外2项为会议摘要。结果:基于有限的可用数据,在所有可用的研究中,TBL通常是有益的;然而,鉴于现有数据的缺乏,对结果的解释应谨慎。研究包括混合课程和单独的TBL。在评估TBL课程成果、考试成绩和学生信心时,研究显示了显著的发现。所有的文章都评估了不同的结果,因此结果之间的比较具有挑战性。会议摘要的研究强度是有限的。需要进一步的研究来确定TBL在其他项目中是否有效。讨论:如果在PA教育中被证明是有效的,那么TBL可以用于提高考试成绩、课程成绩、长期知识记忆或学生信心等结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Team-Based Learning in Physician Assistant/Associate Education: A Mixed Scoping Review.

Introduction: Team-based learning (TBL) is a type of active learning. While TBL was first used in medical instruction at the start of the 2000s, its efficacy within the physician assistant (PA) education has yet to be demonstrated. The objective of this study was to determine existing information about TBL in PA education and to demonstrate the need for further study.

Methods: A mixed scoping review was undertaken. Articles were identified across the search engines CINAHL Complete, Embase, ERIC, and PubMed. Findings were then evaluated using Rayyan and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Forty-nine articles were identified across all databases, with 2 independent reviewers screening records. Ultimately, 6 studies were included. Four studies were original articles, and the other 2 were conference abstracts.

Results: Based on the limited data available, TBL was generally beneficial in all available studies; however, results should be interpreted with caution given the paucity of available data. Studies included both hybrid curriculum and TBL alone. Studies demonstrated significant findings when evaluating TBL course outcomes, examination grades, and student confidence. All articles evaluated different outcomes, so comparison between results is challenging. The strength of research from conference abstracts was limited. Further study is necessary to determine if TBL is effective in other programs.

Discussion: If demonstrated to be effective in PA education, TBL may be used to improve outcomes such as examination performance, course grades, long-term retention of knowledge, or student confidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信