YouTube™和TikTok™视频作为唇腭裂患者的教育工具有用吗?

Q2 Medicine
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.29.6.e2424151.oar
José Dilson Alves de Oliveira Júnior, Anna Vitória Mendes Viana Silva, Carina Cristina Montalvany-Antonucci, Gabriele Andrade Maia, Kamila Rodrigues Junqueira Carvalho, Soraia Macari
{"title":"YouTube™和TikTok™视频作为唇腭裂患者的教育工具有用吗?","authors":"José Dilson Alves de Oliveira Júnior, Anna Vitória Mendes Viana Silva, Carina Cristina Montalvany-Antonucci, Gabriele Andrade Maia, Kamila Rodrigues Junqueira Carvalho, Soraia Macari","doi":"10.1590/2177-6709.29.6.e2424151.oar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the quality of YouTube™ and TikTok™ videos as educational tools for patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) as regards their care, and multidisciplinary treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Videos were searched on YouTube™ and TikTok™ using four keywords. The reliability and quality of the first 60 videos for each keyword and platform were analyzed. The following variables were analyzed: the source, distribution, and purpose of the videos, the general and audiovisual quality of the videos, and their main subject. The study's covariates were cleft classification, dental treatment, pre-surgical orthopedic treatments, surgical and medical treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 480 videos selected, 303 videos were evaluated (177 excluded due to the exclusion criteria). TikTok™ emerged as the most frequently accessed platform, recording a greater number of views and likes. YouTube™ stood out for its availability of longer and more comprehensive videos, in terms of content. On YouTube™ the majority of videos were produced by academic/health and medical organizations, predominantly aimed at educational purposes; whereas on TikTok™ prevailed the production of individual and personal content geared toward informational purposes. On both platforms, the videos proved to be of low quality. YouTube™ videos from individual sources and organizations were associated with medium and low quality, respectively. Additionally, YouTube™ videos of shorter duration were of lower quality. TikTok™ videos had lower overall quality, especially those produced individually, regardless of associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>YouTube™ and TikTok™ exhibited predominantly low-quality videos, suggesting they are not suitable as educational tools to guide patients with CLP for their multidisciplinary treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":38720,"journal":{"name":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"29 6","pages":"e2424151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are YouTube™ and TikTok™ videos useful as educational tool for patients with cleft lip and palate?\",\"authors\":\"José Dilson Alves de Oliveira Júnior, Anna Vitória Mendes Viana Silva, Carina Cristina Montalvany-Antonucci, Gabriele Andrade Maia, Kamila Rodrigues Junqueira Carvalho, Soraia Macari\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2177-6709.29.6.e2424151.oar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the quality of YouTube™ and TikTok™ videos as educational tools for patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) as regards their care, and multidisciplinary treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Videos were searched on YouTube™ and TikTok™ using four keywords. The reliability and quality of the first 60 videos for each keyword and platform were analyzed. The following variables were analyzed: the source, distribution, and purpose of the videos, the general and audiovisual quality of the videos, and their main subject. The study's covariates were cleft classification, dental treatment, pre-surgical orthopedic treatments, surgical and medical treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 480 videos selected, 303 videos were evaluated (177 excluded due to the exclusion criteria). TikTok™ emerged as the most frequently accessed platform, recording a greater number of views and likes. YouTube™ stood out for its availability of longer and more comprehensive videos, in terms of content. On YouTube™ the majority of videos were produced by academic/health and medical organizations, predominantly aimed at educational purposes; whereas on TikTok™ prevailed the production of individual and personal content geared toward informational purposes. On both platforms, the videos proved to be of low quality. YouTube™ videos from individual sources and organizations were associated with medium and low quality, respectively. Additionally, YouTube™ videos of shorter duration were of lower quality. TikTok™ videos had lower overall quality, especially those produced individually, regardless of associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>YouTube™ and TikTok™ exhibited predominantly low-quality videos, suggesting they are not suitable as educational tools to guide patients with CLP for their multidisciplinary treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"e2424151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.29.6.e2424151.oar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.29.6.e2424151.oar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价YouTube™和TikTok™视频作为唇腭裂(CLP)患者的教育工具在护理和多学科治疗方面的质量。方法:使用四个关键词在YouTube™和TikTok™上搜索视频。分析了每个关键词和平台的前60个视频的可靠性和质量。分析了以下变量:视频的来源、分布和目的,视频的一般质量和视听质量,以及视频的主要主题。该研究的协变量为唇裂分类、牙科治疗、术前矫形治疗、外科和内科治疗。结果:在选择的480个视频中,评估了303个视频(根据排除标准排除了177个视频)。TikTok™成为访问频率最高的平台,记录了更多的观看和点赞。就内容而言,YouTube™以其更长的、更全面的视频的可用性而脱颖而出。在YouTube™上,大多数视频是由学术/卫生和医疗组织制作的,主要目的是教育;而在TikTok™上,以信息为目的的个人和个人内容的生产盛行。在这两个平台上,视频的质量都很低。来自个人来源和组织的YouTube™视频分别与中等和低质量相关。此外,持续时间较短的YouTube™视频质量较低。TikTok™视频的整体质量较低,尤其是那些单独制作的视频,无论是否有关联。结论:YouTube™和TikTok™主要展示了低质量的视频,表明它们不适合作为指导CLP患者进行多学科治疗的教育工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are YouTube™ and TikTok™ videos useful as educational tool for patients with cleft lip and palate?

Objective: To evaluate the quality of YouTube™ and TikTok™ videos as educational tools for patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) as regards their care, and multidisciplinary treatment.

Methods: Videos were searched on YouTube™ and TikTok™ using four keywords. The reliability and quality of the first 60 videos for each keyword and platform were analyzed. The following variables were analyzed: the source, distribution, and purpose of the videos, the general and audiovisual quality of the videos, and their main subject. The study's covariates were cleft classification, dental treatment, pre-surgical orthopedic treatments, surgical and medical treatments.

Results: Of the 480 videos selected, 303 videos were evaluated (177 excluded due to the exclusion criteria). TikTok™ emerged as the most frequently accessed platform, recording a greater number of views and likes. YouTube™ stood out for its availability of longer and more comprehensive videos, in terms of content. On YouTube™ the majority of videos were produced by academic/health and medical organizations, predominantly aimed at educational purposes; whereas on TikTok™ prevailed the production of individual and personal content geared toward informational purposes. On both platforms, the videos proved to be of low quality. YouTube™ videos from individual sources and organizations were associated with medium and low quality, respectively. Additionally, YouTube™ videos of shorter duration were of lower quality. TikTok™ videos had lower overall quality, especially those produced individually, regardless of associations.

Conclusions: YouTube™ and TikTok™ exhibited predominantly low-quality videos, suggesting they are not suitable as educational tools to guide patients with CLP for their multidisciplinary treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics publishes scientific research articles, significant reviews, clinical and technical case reports, brief communications, and other materials related to Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信