开放笔记时代以患者为中心的文献指南:定性研究。

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Anita Vanka, Katherine T Johnston, Tom Delbanco, Catherine M DesRoches, Annalays Garcia, Liz Salmi, Charlotte Blease
{"title":"开放笔记时代以患者为中心的文献指南:定性研究。","authors":"Anita Vanka, Katherine T Johnston, Tom Delbanco, Catherine M DesRoches, Annalays Garcia, Liz Salmi, Charlotte Blease","doi":"10.2196/59301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients in the United States have recently gained federally mandated, free, and ready electronic access to clinicians' computerized notes in their medical records (\"open notes\"). This change from longstanding practice can benefit patients in clinically important ways, but studies show some patients feel judged or stigmatized by words or phrases embedded in their records. Therefore, it is imperative that clinicians adopt documentation techniques that help both to empower patients and minimize potential harms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>At a time when open and transparent communication among patients, families, and clinicians can spread more easily throughout medical practice, this inquiry aims to develop informed guidelines for documentation in medical records.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a series of focus groups, preliminary guidelines for documentation language in medical records were developed by health professionals and patients. Using a structured focus group decision guide, we conducted 4 group meetings with different sets of 27 participants: physicians experienced with writing open notes (n=5), patients accustomed to reviewing their notes (n=8), medical student educators (n=7), and resident physicians (n=7). To generate themes, we used an iterative coding process. First-order codes were grouped into second-order themes based on the commonality of meanings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants identified 10 important guidelines as a preliminary framework for developing notes sensitive to patients' needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The process identified 10 discrete themes that can help clinicians use and spread patient-centered documentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"11 ","pages":"e59301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Anita Vanka, Katherine T Johnston, Tom Delbanco, Catherine M DesRoches, Annalays Garcia, Liz Salmi, Charlotte Blease\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/59301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients in the United States have recently gained federally mandated, free, and ready electronic access to clinicians' computerized notes in their medical records (\\\"open notes\\\"). This change from longstanding practice can benefit patients in clinically important ways, but studies show some patients feel judged or stigmatized by words or phrases embedded in their records. Therefore, it is imperative that clinicians adopt documentation techniques that help both to empower patients and minimize potential harms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>At a time when open and transparent communication among patients, families, and clinicians can spread more easily throughout medical practice, this inquiry aims to develop informed guidelines for documentation in medical records.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a series of focus groups, preliminary guidelines for documentation language in medical records were developed by health professionals and patients. Using a structured focus group decision guide, we conducted 4 group meetings with different sets of 27 participants: physicians experienced with writing open notes (n=5), patients accustomed to reviewing their notes (n=8), medical student educators (n=7), and resident physicians (n=7). To generate themes, we used an iterative coding process. First-order codes were grouped into second-order themes based on the commonality of meanings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants identified 10 important guidelines as a preliminary framework for developing notes sensitive to patients' needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The process identified 10 discrete themes that can help clinicians use and spread patient-centered documentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e59301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791454/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/59301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国的患者最近获得了联邦政府授权的、免费的、随时可用的电子访问权限,可以访问临床医生在其医疗记录中的计算机化笔记(“开放笔记”)。这种长期做法的改变在临床上对患者有重要的好处,但研究表明,一些患者会因为病历中嵌入的单词或短语而感到被评判或被污名化。因此,临床医生必须采用文件技术,既能帮助患者,又能最大限度地减少潜在的危害。目的:在病人、家属和临床医生之间公开透明的沟通可以更容易地在整个医疗实践中传播的时候,本调查旨在制定医疗记录文件的知情指导方针。方法:通过一系列的焦点小组,由卫生专业人员和患者共同制定病历文件语言的初步指南。使用结构化的焦点小组决策指南,我们进行了4次小组会议,共有27名不同的参与者:有撰写开放式笔记经验的医生(n=5),习惯回顾笔记的患者(n=8),医学生教育者(n=7)和住院医师(n=7)。为了生成主题,我们使用了迭代编码过程。基于语义共性,将一阶语码划分为二阶主题。结果:参与者确定了10个重要的指导方针,作为开发对患者需求敏感的笔记的初步框架。结论:该过程确定了10个离散的主题,可以帮助临床医生使用和传播以患者为中心的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study.

Background: Patients in the United States have recently gained federally mandated, free, and ready electronic access to clinicians' computerized notes in their medical records ("open notes"). This change from longstanding practice can benefit patients in clinically important ways, but studies show some patients feel judged or stigmatized by words or phrases embedded in their records. Therefore, it is imperative that clinicians adopt documentation techniques that help both to empower patients and minimize potential harms.

Objective: At a time when open and transparent communication among patients, families, and clinicians can spread more easily throughout medical practice, this inquiry aims to develop informed guidelines for documentation in medical records.

Methods: Through a series of focus groups, preliminary guidelines for documentation language in medical records were developed by health professionals and patients. Using a structured focus group decision guide, we conducted 4 group meetings with different sets of 27 participants: physicians experienced with writing open notes (n=5), patients accustomed to reviewing their notes (n=8), medical student educators (n=7), and resident physicians (n=7). To generate themes, we used an iterative coding process. First-order codes were grouped into second-order themes based on the commonality of meanings.

Results: The participants identified 10 important guidelines as a preliminary framework for developing notes sensitive to patients' needs.

Conclusions: The process identified 10 discrete themes that can help clinicians use and spread patient-centered documentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信