摘要:应用新量表对医学生作为模拟教育者的胜任力进行评估与监测。

Q4 Medicine
Jennifer Lindgren Boleyn
{"title":"摘要:应用新量表对医学生作为模拟教育者的胜任力进行评估与监测。","authors":"Jennifer Lindgren Boleyn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physicians are life-long learners and life-long educators. Through their entire careers, they educate patients, residents, medical students, and other health care professionals. There is currently no requirement for medical schools in the United States to provide courses in teaching or communication. Healthcare academia has recognized this need, which resulted in development of peer-assisted teaching and learning programs. USD SSOM has created a Medical Students as Simulation Educators (MSASE) program that teaches medical students the foundational concepts of adult education and how to effectively use them in simulation-based teaching. USD SSOM has demonstrated that learners' outcomes were similar whether they were taught by clinical faculty or by senior medical students. USD SSOM developed a novel Simulation Teaching Academic Competency Evaluation Rubric (STACER). STACER is a complex, multi-domain instrument that assesses multiple aspects of teaching. It allows for granular assessment and tracking of student-instructors' progress as educators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MSASE enrolls 12-18 medical students per year. These students complete asynchronous modules that cover history of healthcare simulation, educational theories, simulation modalities, feedback and debriefing, assessment, and high-fidelity simulation (HFS). After completing the didactic portion, MSASE students participate in teaching junior medical students under the supervision of clinical faculty. During teaching, MSASE students are evaluated with the use of STACER. STACER consists of three written assessments: (1) learner evaluation of student-educators, (2) student-educator's self-assessment, and (3) clinical faculty evaluation of student-educators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant correlation between the student learners' engagement during debriefing, as opposed to during the activity itself, and the perceived value of the activity. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the student learners' perceived judgment during the activity and their perceived value of the activity (p = 0.0013), with less judgement correlating to a higher perceived value. While learners and educators shared a positive perspective on the close relationship between pathophysiology and pharmacology, faculty expressed a more critical viewpoint. One notable discrepancy emerged regarding the three cohort's agreement with the statement, \"theoretical concepts were linked to clinically relevant examples.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STACER is an effective instrument to measure medical students' teaching competencies over time. This data supports the position held by most simulation scholars, emphasizing the importance of engaging debriefing as an integral part of simulation-based learning. Fostering a nonjudgmental learning environment can contribute to a more valuable learning experience. Lastly, this project revealed High Fidelity Simulation as an opportunity for student-educators to both teach and learn.</p>","PeriodicalId":39219,"journal":{"name":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","volume":"77 9","pages":"393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2024 Scholars' Research Symposium Abstract: Assessing and Monitoring Competency of Medical Students as Simulation Educators Using Novel Rubric.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Lindgren Boleyn\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physicians are life-long learners and life-long educators. Through their entire careers, they educate patients, residents, medical students, and other health care professionals. There is currently no requirement for medical schools in the United States to provide courses in teaching or communication. Healthcare academia has recognized this need, which resulted in development of peer-assisted teaching and learning programs. USD SSOM has created a Medical Students as Simulation Educators (MSASE) program that teaches medical students the foundational concepts of adult education and how to effectively use them in simulation-based teaching. USD SSOM has demonstrated that learners' outcomes were similar whether they were taught by clinical faculty or by senior medical students. USD SSOM developed a novel Simulation Teaching Academic Competency Evaluation Rubric (STACER). STACER is a complex, multi-domain instrument that assesses multiple aspects of teaching. It allows for granular assessment and tracking of student-instructors' progress as educators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MSASE enrolls 12-18 medical students per year. These students complete asynchronous modules that cover history of healthcare simulation, educational theories, simulation modalities, feedback and debriefing, assessment, and high-fidelity simulation (HFS). After completing the didactic portion, MSASE students participate in teaching junior medical students under the supervision of clinical faculty. During teaching, MSASE students are evaluated with the use of STACER. STACER consists of three written assessments: (1) learner evaluation of student-educators, (2) student-educator's self-assessment, and (3) clinical faculty evaluation of student-educators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant correlation between the student learners' engagement during debriefing, as opposed to during the activity itself, and the perceived value of the activity. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the student learners' perceived judgment during the activity and their perceived value of the activity (p = 0.0013), with less judgement correlating to a higher perceived value. While learners and educators shared a positive perspective on the close relationship between pathophysiology and pharmacology, faculty expressed a more critical viewpoint. One notable discrepancy emerged regarding the three cohort's agreement with the statement, \\\"theoretical concepts were linked to clinically relevant examples.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STACER is an effective instrument to measure medical students' teaching competencies over time. This data supports the position held by most simulation scholars, emphasizing the importance of engaging debriefing as an integral part of simulation-based learning. Fostering a nonjudgmental learning environment can contribute to a more valuable learning experience. Lastly, this project revealed High Fidelity Simulation as an opportunity for student-educators to both teach and learn.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"77 9\",\"pages\":\"393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医生是终身学习者和终身教育者。在他们的整个职业生涯中,他们教育病人、住院医生、医学生和其他卫生保健专业人员。目前,美国没有要求医学院提供教学或交流方面的课程。医疗学术界已经认识到这一需求,这导致了同行辅助教学和学习计划的发展。SSOM创建了医学生作为模拟教育者(MSASE)项目,向医学生教授成人教育的基本概念以及如何在基于模拟的教学中有效地使用它们。USD SSOM已经证明,无论是由临床教师还是由高级医学生教授,学习者的结果都是相似的。开发了一套新的模拟教学学术能力评价标准(STACER)。STACER是一个复杂的,多领域的仪器,评估教学的多个方面。它允许对学生和教师作为教育者的进步进行细致的评估和跟踪。方法:MSASE每年招收12-18名医学生。这些学生完成异步模块,涵盖医疗模拟的历史、教育理论、模拟模式、反馈和汇报、评估和高保真模拟(HFS)。在完成教学部分后,MSASE学生在临床教师的监督下参与初级医学生的教学。在教学过程中,MSASE学生使用STACER进行评估。STACER包括三个书面评估:(1)学生教育者的学习者评估;(2)学生教育者的自我评估;(3)学生教育者的临床教师评估。结果:与活动本身相比,学生学习者在述职时的参与程度与活动的感知价值之间存在统计学上显著的相关。学生在活动中的感知判断与活动的感知价值呈显著负相关(p = 0.0013),判断越少,感知价值越高。虽然学习者和教育者都对病理生理学和药理学之间的密切关系持积极态度,但教师们却表达了更为批评的观点。一个值得注意的差异出现在三个队列与声明的一致,“理论概念与临床相关的例子相关联。”结论:STACER是衡量医学生教学能力的有效工具。这些数据支持了大多数仿真学者所持的立场,强调了将汇报作为基于仿真的学习的一个组成部分的重要性。培养一个非评判性的学习环境有助于获得更有价值的学习经验。最后,该项目揭示了高保真仿真是学生教育者既教又学的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
2024 Scholars' Research Symposium Abstract: Assessing and Monitoring Competency of Medical Students as Simulation Educators Using Novel Rubric.

Introduction: Physicians are life-long learners and life-long educators. Through their entire careers, they educate patients, residents, medical students, and other health care professionals. There is currently no requirement for medical schools in the United States to provide courses in teaching or communication. Healthcare academia has recognized this need, which resulted in development of peer-assisted teaching and learning programs. USD SSOM has created a Medical Students as Simulation Educators (MSASE) program that teaches medical students the foundational concepts of adult education and how to effectively use them in simulation-based teaching. USD SSOM has demonstrated that learners' outcomes were similar whether they were taught by clinical faculty or by senior medical students. USD SSOM developed a novel Simulation Teaching Academic Competency Evaluation Rubric (STACER). STACER is a complex, multi-domain instrument that assesses multiple aspects of teaching. It allows for granular assessment and tracking of student-instructors' progress as educators.

Methods: MSASE enrolls 12-18 medical students per year. These students complete asynchronous modules that cover history of healthcare simulation, educational theories, simulation modalities, feedback and debriefing, assessment, and high-fidelity simulation (HFS). After completing the didactic portion, MSASE students participate in teaching junior medical students under the supervision of clinical faculty. During teaching, MSASE students are evaluated with the use of STACER. STACER consists of three written assessments: (1) learner evaluation of student-educators, (2) student-educator's self-assessment, and (3) clinical faculty evaluation of student-educators.

Results: There was a statistically significant correlation between the student learners' engagement during debriefing, as opposed to during the activity itself, and the perceived value of the activity. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the student learners' perceived judgment during the activity and their perceived value of the activity (p = 0.0013), with less judgement correlating to a higher perceived value. While learners and educators shared a positive perspective on the close relationship between pathophysiology and pharmacology, faculty expressed a more critical viewpoint. One notable discrepancy emerged regarding the three cohort's agreement with the statement, "theoretical concepts were linked to clinically relevant examples."

Conclusions: STACER is an effective instrument to measure medical students' teaching competencies over time. This data supports the position held by most simulation scholars, emphasizing the importance of engaging debriefing as an integral part of simulation-based learning. Fostering a nonjudgmental learning environment can contribute to a more valuable learning experience. Lastly, this project revealed High Fidelity Simulation as an opportunity for student-educators to both teach and learn.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信