评估艾滋病毒自我检测对巴西贝洛奥里藏特弱势群体诊断率的影响:一项横断面分析。

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
João Vitor Innecco Arêas, Gabriela Bragança Costa e Moreira, Gabriela Picchioni Baêta, João Vitor Levindo Coelho Novaes, Luísa Castro de Sousa Pires, Luara Isabela dos Santos
{"title":"评估艾滋病毒自我检测对巴西贝洛奥里藏特弱势群体诊断率的影响:一项横断面分析。","authors":"João Vitor Innecco Arêas,&nbsp;Gabriela Bragança Costa e Moreira,&nbsp;Gabriela Picchioni Baêta,&nbsp;João Vitor Levindo Coelho Novaes,&nbsp;Luísa Castro de Sousa Pires,&nbsp;Luara Isabela dos Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In recent years, HIV self-testing (HIVST) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance accessibility and uptake of HIV testing, particularly among populations at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Despite its potential benefits, the effectiveness, and challenges of HIVST warrant careful examination to inform public health strategies effectively. This study investigates the effectiveness and challenges of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in populations at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). <strong>Study design</strong>: Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We employed questionnaires, HIVST, and standard tests for HIV, Hepatitis C, and Syphilis, in patients exhibiting STI risk behaviors in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, between August and November of 2019.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We engaged 125 individuals, median age of 33.5 years, with most participants (61 %) deviating significantly during self-testing. Despite this, HIVST was generally perceived as user-friendly. From the perspective of health professionals, there was 100 % agreement between HIVST and the gold standard HIV testing results. Notably, among those seeking solely HIV testing, 19.2 % tested positive for Syphilis, and 4.8 % for Hepatitis C. Only a minority (4.8 %) were aware of the HIV window period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While HIVST presents benefits, the evidence does not yet support its widespread adoption as a standalone public health policy. Moreover, exclusive reliance on HIVST might mask the prevalence of other STIs. We advocate for a holistic approach to HIV and STI testing, incorporating education, counseling, and comprehensive healthcare access in public health initiatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100567"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of HIV self-testing on diagnosis rates in vulnerable groups in belo horizonte, Brazil: A cross-sectional analysis\",\"authors\":\"João Vitor Innecco Arêas,&nbsp;Gabriela Bragança Costa e Moreira,&nbsp;Gabriela Picchioni Baêta,&nbsp;João Vitor Levindo Coelho Novaes,&nbsp;Luísa Castro de Sousa Pires,&nbsp;Luara Isabela dos Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In recent years, HIV self-testing (HIVST) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance accessibility and uptake of HIV testing, particularly among populations at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Despite its potential benefits, the effectiveness, and challenges of HIVST warrant careful examination to inform public health strategies effectively. This study investigates the effectiveness and challenges of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in populations at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). <strong>Study design</strong>: Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We employed questionnaires, HIVST, and standard tests for HIV, Hepatitis C, and Syphilis, in patients exhibiting STI risk behaviors in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, between August and November of 2019.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We engaged 125 individuals, median age of 33.5 years, with most participants (61 %) deviating significantly during self-testing. Despite this, HIVST was generally perceived as user-friendly. From the perspective of health professionals, there was 100 % agreement between HIVST and the gold standard HIV testing results. Notably, among those seeking solely HIV testing, 19.2 % tested positive for Syphilis, and 4.8 % for Hepatitis C. Only a minority (4.8 %) were aware of the HIV window period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While HIVST presents benefits, the evidence does not yet support its widespread adoption as a standalone public health policy. Moreover, exclusive reliance on HIVST might mask the prevalence of other STIs. We advocate for a holistic approach to HIV and STI testing, incorporating education, counseling, and comprehensive healthcare access in public health initiatives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742301/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224001046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224001046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,艾滋病毒自我检测(HIVST)已成为提高艾滋病毒检测可及性和接受度的一种有希望的方法,特别是在性传播感染(sti)高风险人群中。尽管有潜在的好处,但艾滋病毒传播的有效性和挑战值得仔细审查,以便有效地为公共卫生战略提供信息。本研究探讨了在性传播感染(STIs)高危人群中开展艾滋病毒自我检测(HIVST)的有效性和面临的挑战。研究设计:横断面研究。方法:我们对2019年8月至11月在巴西贝洛奥里藏特表现出性传播感染风险行为的患者进行了问卷调查、艾滋病毒检测以及艾滋病毒、丙型肝炎和梅毒的标准检测。结果:我们招募了125个人,中位年龄33.5岁,大多数参与者(61%)在自我测试中显著偏离。尽管如此,艾滋病毒传播通常被认为是用户友好的。从卫生专业人员的角度来看,艾滋病毒检测与黄金标准艾滋病毒检测结果100%一致。值得注意的是,在那些只寻求艾滋病毒检测的人中,有19.2%的人梅毒检测呈阳性,4.8%的人丙型肝炎检测呈阳性,只有少数人(4.8%)知道艾滋病毒窗口期。结论:虽然艾滋病毒传播具有益处,但证据尚不支持将其作为一项独立的公共卫生政策广泛采用。此外,完全依赖艾滋病毒传播可能掩盖其他性传播感染的流行。我们提倡对艾滋病毒和性传播感染检测采取综合办法,将教育、咨询和全面医疗保健纳入公共卫生倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the impact of HIV self-testing on diagnosis rates in vulnerable groups in belo horizonte, Brazil: A cross-sectional analysis

Assessing the impact of HIV self-testing on diagnosis rates in vulnerable groups in belo horizonte, Brazil: A cross-sectional analysis

Background

In recent years, HIV self-testing (HIVST) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance accessibility and uptake of HIV testing, particularly among populations at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Despite its potential benefits, the effectiveness, and challenges of HIVST warrant careful examination to inform public health strategies effectively. This study investigates the effectiveness and challenges of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in populations at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods

We employed questionnaires, HIVST, and standard tests for HIV, Hepatitis C, and Syphilis, in patients exhibiting STI risk behaviors in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, between August and November of 2019.

Results

We engaged 125 individuals, median age of 33.5 years, with most participants (61 %) deviating significantly during self-testing. Despite this, HIVST was generally perceived as user-friendly. From the perspective of health professionals, there was 100 % agreement between HIVST and the gold standard HIV testing results. Notably, among those seeking solely HIV testing, 19.2 % tested positive for Syphilis, and 4.8 % for Hepatitis C. Only a minority (4.8 %) were aware of the HIV window period.

Conclusion

While HIVST presents benefits, the evidence does not yet support its widespread adoption as a standalone public health policy. Moreover, exclusive reliance on HIVST might mask the prevalence of other STIs. We advocate for a holistic approach to HIV and STI testing, incorporating education, counseling, and comprehensive healthcare access in public health initiatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信