Qi-Hong Zhong, Jiang-Shan Huang, Fei-Long Guo, Jing-Yu Wu, Mao-Xiu Yuan, Jia-Fu Zhu, Wen-Wei Lin, Sui Chen, Zhen-Yang Zhang, Jiang-Bo Lin
{"title":"微创食管切除术后手术不良事件的预测和分层:一项双中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Qi-Hong Zhong, Jiang-Shan Huang, Fei-Long Guo, Jing-Yu Wu, Mao-Xiu Yuan, Jia-Fu Zhu, Wen-Wei Lin, Sui Chen, Zhen-Yang Zhang, Jiang-Bo Lin","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.101041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a widely accepted treatment for esophageal cancer, yet it is associated with a significant risk of surgical adverse events (SAEs), which can compromise patient recovery and long-term survival. Accurate preoperative identification of high-risk patients is critical for improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To establish and validate a risk prediction and stratification model for the risk of SAEs in patients with MIE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 747 patients who underwent MIE at two centers from January 2019 to February 2024. Patients were separated into a train set (<i>n</i> = 549) and a validation set (<i>n</i> = 198). After screening by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, multivariate logistic regression analyzed clinical and intraoperative variables to identify independent risk factors for SAEs. A risk stratification model was constructed and validated to predict the probability of SAEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SAEs occurred in 10.2% of patients in train set and 13.6% in the validation set. Patients with SAE had significantly higher complication rate and a longer hospital stay after surgery. The key independent risk factors identified included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a history of alcohol consumption, low forced expiratory volume in the first second, and low albumin levels. The stratification model has excellent prediction accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.889 for the training set and an area under the curve of 0.793 for the validation set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed risk stratification model effectively predicts the risk of SAEs in patients undergoing MIE, facilitating targeted preoperative interventions and improving perioperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"31 3","pages":"101041"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction and stratification for the surgical adverse events after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A two-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Qi-Hong Zhong, Jiang-Shan Huang, Fei-Long Guo, Jing-Yu Wu, Mao-Xiu Yuan, Jia-Fu Zhu, Wen-Wei Lin, Sui Chen, Zhen-Yang Zhang, Jiang-Bo Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.101041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a widely accepted treatment for esophageal cancer, yet it is associated with a significant risk of surgical adverse events (SAEs), which can compromise patient recovery and long-term survival. Accurate preoperative identification of high-risk patients is critical for improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To establish and validate a risk prediction and stratification model for the risk of SAEs in patients with MIE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 747 patients who underwent MIE at two centers from January 2019 to February 2024. Patients were separated into a train set (<i>n</i> = 549) and a validation set (<i>n</i> = 198). After screening by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, multivariate logistic regression analyzed clinical and intraoperative variables to identify independent risk factors for SAEs. A risk stratification model was constructed and validated to predict the probability of SAEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SAEs occurred in 10.2% of patients in train set and 13.6% in the validation set. Patients with SAE had significantly higher complication rate and a longer hospital stay after surgery. The key independent risk factors identified included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a history of alcohol consumption, low forced expiratory volume in the first second, and low albumin levels. The stratification model has excellent prediction accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.889 for the training set and an area under the curve of 0.793 for the validation set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed risk stratification model effectively predicts the risk of SAEs in patients undergoing MIE, facilitating targeted preoperative interventions and improving perioperative management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"101041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684167/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.101041\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.101041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prediction and stratification for the surgical adverse events after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A two-center retrospective study.
Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a widely accepted treatment for esophageal cancer, yet it is associated with a significant risk of surgical adverse events (SAEs), which can compromise patient recovery and long-term survival. Accurate preoperative identification of high-risk patients is critical for improving outcomes.
Aim: To establish and validate a risk prediction and stratification model for the risk of SAEs in patients with MIE.
Methods: This retrospective study included 747 patients who underwent MIE at two centers from January 2019 to February 2024. Patients were separated into a train set (n = 549) and a validation set (n = 198). After screening by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, multivariate logistic regression analyzed clinical and intraoperative variables to identify independent risk factors for SAEs. A risk stratification model was constructed and validated to predict the probability of SAEs.
Results: SAEs occurred in 10.2% of patients in train set and 13.6% in the validation set. Patients with SAE had significantly higher complication rate and a longer hospital stay after surgery. The key independent risk factors identified included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a history of alcohol consumption, low forced expiratory volume in the first second, and low albumin levels. The stratification model has excellent prediction accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.889 for the training set and an area under the curve of 0.793 for the validation set.
Conclusion: The developed risk stratification model effectively predicts the risk of SAEs in patients undergoing MIE, facilitating targeted preoperative interventions and improving perioperative management.
期刊介绍:
The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.