深度学习预测根治性前列腺切除术难度:一种新的评估方案。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Haonan Mei, Zhongyu Wang, Qingyuan Zheng, Panpan Jiao, Jiejun Wu, Xiuheng Liu, Rui Yang
{"title":"深度学习预测根治性前列腺切除术难度:一种新的评估方案。","authors":"Haonan Mei, Zhongyu Wang, Qingyuan Zheng, Panpan Jiao, Jiejun Wu, Xiuheng Liu, Rui Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.01.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore new metrics for assessing radical prostatectomy difficulty through a two-stage deep learning method from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The procedure and metrics were validated through 290 patients consisting of laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy procedures from two real cohorts. The nnUNet_v2 adaptive model was trained to perform accurate segmentation of the prostate and pelvis. A modified network PointNet was used for indirectly regressing 15 anatomical landmarks based on Gaussian heatmaps. Novel metrics proposed in this study that characterized the spatial relationship between the prostate and pelvis were included to evaluate the surgical difficulty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two-stage process achieved decent segmentation and landmark localization results with the Mean Validation Dice of 0.8641 and millimeter-level accuracy. We found the coefficients of PV, ρ, PT, PAP, AG, PSD<sub>1</sub>, PSD<sub>2</sub>, πρ<sup>2</sup>/ISTA, AG+PG, AG×PG, PSD<sub>2</sub>×ρ, PAP/(AG+PG) with Estimated Blood Loss and PSD<sub>2</sub>, PSD<sub>2</sub>×ρ with Operation Time, respectively with statistic significant, which provides possibilities for assessing surgical difficulty evaluation. The entire pipeline had been validated on the external dataset, and the results were consistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two-stage anatomical landmark localization approach is feasible. Indicators describing pelvic-prostate spatial constraints significantly impact surgical difficulty in radical prostatectomy, leading to increased blood loss and longer operation times, while isolated pelvic measurements have minimal effect on surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning for Predicting Difficulty in Radical Prostatectomy: A Novel Evaluation Scheme.\",\"authors\":\"Haonan Mei, Zhongyu Wang, Qingyuan Zheng, Panpan Jiao, Jiejun Wu, Xiuheng Liu, Rui Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2025.01.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore new metrics for assessing radical prostatectomy difficulty through a two-stage deep learning method from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The procedure and metrics were validated through 290 patients consisting of laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy procedures from two real cohorts. The nnUNet_v2 adaptive model was trained to perform accurate segmentation of the prostate and pelvis. A modified network PointNet was used for indirectly regressing 15 anatomical landmarks based on Gaussian heatmaps. Novel metrics proposed in this study that characterized the spatial relationship between the prostate and pelvis were included to evaluate the surgical difficulty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two-stage process achieved decent segmentation and landmark localization results with the Mean Validation Dice of 0.8641 and millimeter-level accuracy. We found the coefficients of PV, ρ, PT, PAP, AG, PSD<sub>1</sub>, PSD<sub>2</sub>, πρ<sup>2</sup>/ISTA, AG+PG, AG×PG, PSD<sub>2</sub>×ρ, PAP/(AG+PG) with Estimated Blood Loss and PSD<sub>2</sub>, PSD<sub>2</sub>×ρ with Operation Time, respectively with statistic significant, which provides possibilities for assessing surgical difficulty evaluation. The entire pipeline had been validated on the external dataset, and the results were consistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two-stage anatomical landmark localization approach is feasible. Indicators describing pelvic-prostate spatial constraints significantly impact surgical difficulty in radical prostatectomy, leading to increased blood loss and longer operation times, while isolated pelvic measurements have minimal effect on surgical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.01.028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.01.028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过术前磁共振成像的两阶段深度学习方法,探索评估根治性前列腺切除术难度的新指标。方法:通过290名患者进行腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术,验证了该程序和指标。训练nnUNet_v2自适应模型对前列腺和骨盆进行准确分割。采用改进的PointNet网络对基于高斯热图的15个解剖标志进行间接回归。本研究提出了新的指标,描述了前列腺和骨盆之间的空间关系,以评估手术难度。结果:两阶段过程均取得了较好的分割和地标定位效果,平均验证骰子为0.8641,精度为毫米级。我们发现PV、ρ、PT、PAP、AG、PSD1、PSD2、πρ2/ISTA、AG+PG、AG×PG、PSD2×ρ、PAP/(AG+PG)与估计失血量、PSD2、PSD2×ρ与手术时间的系数分别具有统计学意义,为评估手术难度提供了可能。整个管道已经在外部数据集上进行了验证,结果是一致的。结论:两阶段解剖标记定位方法是可行的。描述盆腔-前列腺空间限制的指标显著影响根治性前列腺切除术的手术难度,导致出血量增加和手术时间延长,而孤立的盆腔测量对手术结果的影响很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning for Predicting Difficulty in Radical Prostatectomy: A Novel Evaluation Scheme.

Objectives: To explore new metrics for assessing radical prostatectomy difficulty through a two-stage deep learning method from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods: The procedure and metrics were validated through 290 patients consisting of laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy procedures from two real cohorts. The nnUNet_v2 adaptive model was trained to perform accurate segmentation of the prostate and pelvis. A modified network PointNet was used for indirectly regressing 15 anatomical landmarks based on Gaussian heatmaps. Novel metrics proposed in this study that characterized the spatial relationship between the prostate and pelvis were included to evaluate the surgical difficulty.

Results: The two-stage process achieved decent segmentation and landmark localization results with the Mean Validation Dice of 0.8641 and millimeter-level accuracy. We found the coefficients of PV, ρ, PT, PAP, AG, PSD1, PSD2, πρ2/ISTA, AG+PG, AG×PG, PSD2×ρ, PAP/(AG+PG) with Estimated Blood Loss and PSD2, PSD2×ρ with Operation Time, respectively with statistic significant, which provides possibilities for assessing surgical difficulty evaluation. The entire pipeline had been validated on the external dataset, and the results were consistent.

Conclusions: The two-stage anatomical landmark localization approach is feasible. Indicators describing pelvic-prostate spatial constraints significantly impact surgical difficulty in radical prostatectomy, leading to increased blood loss and longer operation times, while isolated pelvic measurements have minimal effect on surgical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信