除草还是保留：健康科学图书馆参考馆藏的翻新驱动除草项目，重点是最后的机构副本-案例研究。

Q1 Social Sciences

Medical Reference Services Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1080/02763869.2025.2453718

Maria Deptula

{"title":"除草还是保留：健康科学图书馆参考馆藏的翻新驱动除草项目，重点是最后的机构副本-案例研究。","authors":"Maria Deptula","doi":"10.1080/02763869.2025.2453718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The weeding project of the George F. Smith Library Reference Collection was undertaken due to anticipated space reconfiguration. With no place to relocate the reference books, the librarians eliminated the reference books from the area selected for redesign by discarding material or interfiling it with the circulating collection. Only a small portion of the \"last copy monographs\" collection was selected for retention and preservation. This case study presents an analysis of a one-time comprehensive project to free up space, dispose of obsolete material, and demonstrate what went behind the decisions to discard, interfile, or preserve the \"last institutional copies\" of monographs.","PeriodicalId":39720,"journal":{"name":"Medical Reference Services Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Weed or to Keep: A Renovation-Driven Weeding Project of the Health Sciences Library Reference Collection with a Focus on the Last Institutional Copies - A Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Deptula\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02763869.2025.2453718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The weeding project of the George F. Smith Library Reference Collection was undertaken due to anticipated space reconfiguration. With no place to relocate the reference books, the librarians eliminated the reference books from the area selected for redesign by discarding material or interfiling it with the circulating collection. Only a small portion of the \\\"last copy monographs\\\" collection was selected for retention and preservation. This case study presents an analysis of a one-time comprehensive project to free up space, dispose of obsolete material, and demonstrate what went behind the decisions to discard, interfile, or preserve the \\\"last institutional copies\\\" of monographs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Reference Services Quarterly\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Reference Services Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2025.2453718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Reference Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2025.2453718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

乔治·f·史密斯图书馆参考馆藏的除草项目是由于预期的空间重构而进行的。由于没有地方重新安置参考书，图书管理员通过丢弃材料或将其与流通馆藏穿插在一起，将参考书从选择重新设计的区域中消除。只有一小部分“最后一份专著”收藏被选择保留和保存。本案例研究分析了一个一次性的综合项目，该项目旨在释放空间，处理过时的材料，并展示了丢弃、交叉归档或保存专著“最后的机构副本”的决定背后的原因。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

To Weed or to Keep: A Renovation-Driven Weeding Project of the Health Sciences Library Reference Collection with a Focus on the Last Institutional Copies - A Case Study.

The weeding project of the George F. Smith Library Reference Collection was undertaken due to anticipated space reconfiguration. With no place to relocate the reference books, the librarians eliminated the reference books from the area selected for redesign by discarding material or interfiling it with the circulating collection. Only a small portion of the "last copy monographs" collection was selected for retention and preservation. This case study presents an analysis of a one-time comprehensive project to free up space, dispose of obsolete material, and demonstrate what went behind the decisions to discard, interfile, or preserve the "last institutional copies" of monographs.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Medical Reference Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This highly acclaimed, peer-reviewed journal is an essential working tool for medical and health sciences librarians. For those professionals who provide reference and public services to health sciences personnel in clinical, educational, or research settings, Medical Reference Services Quarterly covers topics of current interest and practical value in the areas of reference in medicine and related specialties, the biomedical sciences, nursing, and allied health. This exciting and comprehensive resource regularly publishes brief practice-oriented articles relating to medical reference services, with an emphasis on user education, database searching, and electronic information. Two columns feature the Internet and informatics education.