“他们知道同样的挣扎”:对慢性移植物抗宿主病患者群体应对技能干预的看法。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Joely A Centracchio, Daniel G Yang, Annemarie D Jagielo, Joseph A Greer, Areej El-Jawahri, Lara Traeger, Ashley M Nelson
{"title":"“他们知道同样的挣扎”:对慢性移植物抗宿主病患者群体应对技能干预的看法。","authors":"Joely A Centracchio, Daniel G Yang, Annemarie D Jagielo, Joseph A Greer, Areej El-Jawahri, Lara Traeger, Ashley M Nelson","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09153-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD), an inflammatory condition affecting allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors, is associated with a range of debilitating physical and psychological sequela. Yet HCT recipients with cGVHD are virtually absent from survivorship intervention research. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a multidisciplinary group coping skills intervention (Horizons) tailored to meet these patients' unique needs. For this follow-up qualitative analysis, we evaluated the perceived impact of the Horizons intervention by the group participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We purposefully selected a subset of Horizons participants (n = 19) to complete audio-recorded exit interviews via semi-structured interview guide. We used rapid analysis to characterize participant feedback in three domains: (1) motivations to participate, (2) perceived benefits of participation, and (3) impacts of participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings highlight participants' motivations to participate centered on desires to connect with others living with cGVHD and to help future patients. Perceived benefits of participation focused on the following categories: (1) connecting with other survivors, (2) learning about cGVHD, and (3) learning coping strategies to manage specific cGVHD symptoms. Impacts of participation on everyday life variably reflected categories of (1) increased sense of empowerment to contact their care team with questions and concerns, (2) increased support and validation in their struggles with cGVHD, and (3) renewed motivation or progress toward personal and health-specific goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings demonstrate participants' appreciation for a group-based opportunity to connect with others living with cGVHD and strengthen skills for navigating cGVHD challenges. Results support the ongoing need for evidence-based interventions to improve quality of life among HCT survivors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov , identifier NCT04479995. Date of Registration: July 21, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 2","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"They knew the same struggles\\\": perceptions of a group coping skills intervention in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease.\",\"authors\":\"Joely A Centracchio, Daniel G Yang, Annemarie D Jagielo, Joseph A Greer, Areej El-Jawahri, Lara Traeger, Ashley M Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09153-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD), an inflammatory condition affecting allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors, is associated with a range of debilitating physical and psychological sequela. Yet HCT recipients with cGVHD are virtually absent from survivorship intervention research. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a multidisciplinary group coping skills intervention (Horizons) tailored to meet these patients' unique needs. For this follow-up qualitative analysis, we evaluated the perceived impact of the Horizons intervention by the group participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We purposefully selected a subset of Horizons participants (n = 19) to complete audio-recorded exit interviews via semi-structured interview guide. We used rapid analysis to characterize participant feedback in three domains: (1) motivations to participate, (2) perceived benefits of participation, and (3) impacts of participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings highlight participants' motivations to participate centered on desires to connect with others living with cGVHD and to help future patients. Perceived benefits of participation focused on the following categories: (1) connecting with other survivors, (2) learning about cGVHD, and (3) learning coping strategies to manage specific cGVHD symptoms. Impacts of participation on everyday life variably reflected categories of (1) increased sense of empowerment to contact their care team with questions and concerns, (2) increased support and validation in their struggles with cGVHD, and (3) renewed motivation or progress toward personal and health-specific goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings demonstrate participants' appreciation for a group-based opportunity to connect with others living with cGVHD and strengthen skills for navigating cGVHD challenges. Results support the ongoing need for evidence-based interventions to improve quality of life among HCT survivors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov , identifier NCT04479995. Date of Registration: July 21, 2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735584/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09153-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09153-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:慢性移植物抗宿主病(cGVHD)是一种影响同种异体造血细胞移植(HCT)幸存者的炎症性疾病,与一系列衰弱的身体和心理后遗症相关。然而,患有cGVHD的HCT受者在生存干预研究中几乎是缺席的。我们进行了一项随机临床试验,以评估多学科群体应对技能干预(Horizons)的可行性和初步效果,以满足这些患者的独特需求。对于这个后续定性分析,我们评估了小组参与者对地平线干预的感知影响。方法:我们有目的地选择了地平线参与者的一个子集(n = 19),通过半结构化访谈指南完成录音的离职访谈。我们使用快速分析来描述参与者在三个领域的反馈特征:(1)参与动机,(2)参与的感知利益,(3)参与的影响。结果:研究结果强调参与者参与的动机集中在与其他cGVHD患者联系并帮助未来患者的愿望上。参与的好处主要集中在以下几个方面:(1)与其他幸存者建立联系;(2)了解cGVHD;(3)学习应对策略以管理特定的cGVHD症状。参与对日常生活的影响不同地反映了(1)增强了与护理团队联系问题和担忧的授权感,(2)在与cGVHD的斗争中增加了支持和认可,以及(3)在个人和健康特定目标方面重新获得动力或进步。结论:研究结果表明,参与者对与其他cGVHD患者建立联系的群体机会表示赞赏,并加强应对cGVHD挑战的技能。研究结果支持对基于证据的干预措施的持续需求,以改善HCT幸存者的生活质量。试验注册:www.Clinicaltrials: gov,标识符NCT04479995。注册日期:2020年7月21日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"They knew the same struggles": perceptions of a group coping skills intervention in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Purpose: Chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD), an inflammatory condition affecting allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors, is associated with a range of debilitating physical and psychological sequela. Yet HCT recipients with cGVHD are virtually absent from survivorship intervention research. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a multidisciplinary group coping skills intervention (Horizons) tailored to meet these patients' unique needs. For this follow-up qualitative analysis, we evaluated the perceived impact of the Horizons intervention by the group participants.

Methods: We purposefully selected a subset of Horizons participants (n = 19) to complete audio-recorded exit interviews via semi-structured interview guide. We used rapid analysis to characterize participant feedback in three domains: (1) motivations to participate, (2) perceived benefits of participation, and (3) impacts of participation.

Results: Findings highlight participants' motivations to participate centered on desires to connect with others living with cGVHD and to help future patients. Perceived benefits of participation focused on the following categories: (1) connecting with other survivors, (2) learning about cGVHD, and (3) learning coping strategies to manage specific cGVHD symptoms. Impacts of participation on everyday life variably reflected categories of (1) increased sense of empowerment to contact their care team with questions and concerns, (2) increased support and validation in their struggles with cGVHD, and (3) renewed motivation or progress toward personal and health-specific goals.

Conclusion: Study findings demonstrate participants' appreciation for a group-based opportunity to connect with others living with cGVHD and strengthen skills for navigating cGVHD challenges. Results support the ongoing need for evidence-based interventions to improve quality of life among HCT survivors.

Trial registration: www.

Clinicaltrials: gov , identifier NCT04479995. Date of Registration: July 21, 2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信