种族/民族与急性外伤性颈脊髓损伤成人发病率和死亡率的关系。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005260
Aladine A Elsamadicy, Selma Belkasim, Paul Serrato, Sina Sadeghzadeh, Shaila D Ghanekar, Syed I Khalid, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, Daniel M Sciubba
{"title":"种族/民族与急性外伤性颈脊髓损伤成人发病率和死亡率的关系。","authors":"Aladine A Elsamadicy, Selma Belkasim, Paul Serrato, Sina Sadeghzadeh, Shaila D Ghanekar, Syed I Khalid, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, Daniel M Sciubba","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the association of race with morbidity and mortality in acute cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) patients.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Racial disparities in spine surgery are associated with adverse outcomes, however, the impact of race on cSCI is understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs database to compare outcomes for acute cSCI patients between racial/ethnic identities: non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic/Latino (HIS), and other (OTH). Demographics, comorbidities, injury type, treatment modality, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of AEs, non-routine discharge (NRD), and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 71,048 patients stratified by race/ethnicity: 44,639 (62.8%) NHW, 13,555 (19.1%) NHB, 5,820 (8.2%) HIS, and 7,034 (9.9%) OTH. NHB and HIS-identifying patients had the greatest rates of any AE (NHW: 20.7% vs. NHB: 25.0% vs. HIS: 24.6% vs. OTH: 22.0%, P<0.001) and the longest mean length of stay (NHW: 11.3±13.5 d vs. NHB: 15.5±20.2 d vs. HIS: 15.0±20.5 d vs. OTH: 12.6±17.5 d, P<0.001). NRDs were lowest for HIS-identifying patients (NHW: 74.8% vs. NHB: 75.5% vs. HIS: 69.5% vs. OTH: 75.4%, P<0.001), while in-hospital mortality was lowest for NHB-identifying patients (NHW: 12.8% vs. NHB: 10.1% vs. HIS: 12.4% vs. OTH: 13.4%, P<0.001). On multivariable analyses, NHB (OR: 1.16, P<0.001), HIS (OR: 1.22, P<0.001), and OTH (OR: 1.14, P=0.004) cohorts had significantly increased odds of AEs. The NHB cohort had significantly increased odds (OR: 1.25, P<0.001), while the HIS cohort had significantly decreased odds (OR: 0.78, P=0.001) of NRD. Only the NHB cohort had significantly decreased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.69, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests racial disparities in outcomes and discharge disposition for acute cSCI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial/Ethnic Associations with Morbidity and Mortality in Adults with Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Aladine A Elsamadicy, Selma Belkasim, Paul Serrato, Sina Sadeghzadeh, Shaila D Ghanekar, Syed I Khalid, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, Daniel M Sciubba\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the association of race with morbidity and mortality in acute cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) patients.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Racial disparities in spine surgery are associated with adverse outcomes, however, the impact of race on cSCI is understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs database to compare outcomes for acute cSCI patients between racial/ethnic identities: non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic/Latino (HIS), and other (OTH). Demographics, comorbidities, injury type, treatment modality, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of AEs, non-routine discharge (NRD), and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 71,048 patients stratified by race/ethnicity: 44,639 (62.8%) NHW, 13,555 (19.1%) NHB, 5,820 (8.2%) HIS, and 7,034 (9.9%) OTH. NHB and HIS-identifying patients had the greatest rates of any AE (NHW: 20.7% vs. NHB: 25.0% vs. HIS: 24.6% vs. OTH: 22.0%, P<0.001) and the longest mean length of stay (NHW: 11.3±13.5 d vs. NHB: 15.5±20.2 d vs. HIS: 15.0±20.5 d vs. OTH: 12.6±17.5 d, P<0.001). NRDs were lowest for HIS-identifying patients (NHW: 74.8% vs. NHB: 75.5% vs. HIS: 69.5% vs. OTH: 75.4%, P<0.001), while in-hospital mortality was lowest for NHB-identifying patients (NHW: 12.8% vs. NHB: 10.1% vs. HIS: 12.4% vs. OTH: 13.4%, P<0.001). On multivariable analyses, NHB (OR: 1.16, P<0.001), HIS (OR: 1.22, P<0.001), and OTH (OR: 1.14, P=0.004) cohorts had significantly increased odds of AEs. The NHB cohort had significantly increased odds (OR: 1.25, P<0.001), while the HIS cohort had significantly decreased odds (OR: 0.78, P=0.001) of NRD. Only the NHB cohort had significantly decreased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.69, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests racial disparities in outcomes and discharge disposition for acute cSCI patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005260\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005260","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:本研究旨在探讨种族与急性颈脊髓损伤(cSCI)患者发病率和死亡率的关系。背景资料摘要:脊柱外科手术中的种族差异与不良结果相关,然而,种族对cSCI的影响尚未得到充分研究。方法:我们回顾性地回顾了美国外科医师学会创伤质量计划数据库,比较不同种族/民族身份的急性cSCI患者的结局:非西班牙裔白人(NHW)、非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)、西班牙裔/拉丁裔(HIS)和其他(OTH)。评估了人口统计学、合并症、损伤类型、治疗方式和不良事件(ae)。采用多变量logistic回归确定ae、非常规出院(NRD)和住院死亡率的独立预测因子。结果:共有71,048例患者按种族/民族分层:44639例(62.8%)NHW, 13555例(19.1%)NHB, 5820例(8.2%)HIS, 7034例(9.9%)OTH。NHB和HIS患者的AE发生率最高(NHW: 20.7%, NHB: 25.0%, HIS: 24.6%, OTH: 22.0%)。结论:我们的研究表明急性cSCI患者的结局和出院处理存在种族差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial/Ethnic Associations with Morbidity and Mortality in Adults with Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association of race with morbidity and mortality in acute cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) patients.

Summary of background data: Racial disparities in spine surgery are associated with adverse outcomes, however, the impact of race on cSCI is understudied.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs database to compare outcomes for acute cSCI patients between racial/ethnic identities: non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic/Latino (HIS), and other (OTH). Demographics, comorbidities, injury type, treatment modality, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of AEs, non-routine discharge (NRD), and in-hospital mortality.

Results: There were 71,048 patients stratified by race/ethnicity: 44,639 (62.8%) NHW, 13,555 (19.1%) NHB, 5,820 (8.2%) HIS, and 7,034 (9.9%) OTH. NHB and HIS-identifying patients had the greatest rates of any AE (NHW: 20.7% vs. NHB: 25.0% vs. HIS: 24.6% vs. OTH: 22.0%, P<0.001) and the longest mean length of stay (NHW: 11.3±13.5 d vs. NHB: 15.5±20.2 d vs. HIS: 15.0±20.5 d vs. OTH: 12.6±17.5 d, P<0.001). NRDs were lowest for HIS-identifying patients (NHW: 74.8% vs. NHB: 75.5% vs. HIS: 69.5% vs. OTH: 75.4%, P<0.001), while in-hospital mortality was lowest for NHB-identifying patients (NHW: 12.8% vs. NHB: 10.1% vs. HIS: 12.4% vs. OTH: 13.4%, P<0.001). On multivariable analyses, NHB (OR: 1.16, P<0.001), HIS (OR: 1.22, P<0.001), and OTH (OR: 1.14, P=0.004) cohorts had significantly increased odds of AEs. The NHB cohort had significantly increased odds (OR: 1.25, P<0.001), while the HIS cohort had significantly decreased odds (OR: 0.78, P=0.001) of NRD. Only the NHB cohort had significantly decreased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.69, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Our study suggests racial disparities in outcomes and discharge disposition for acute cSCI patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信