椎体系扎与根尖融合术的生物力学效应分析。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005261
Jil Frank, Per David Trobisch, Miguel Pishnamaz, Frank Hildebrand, Maximilian Praster
{"title":"椎体系扎与根尖融合术的生物力学效应分析。","authors":"Jil Frank, Per David Trobisch, Miguel Pishnamaz, Frank Hildebrand, Maximilian Praster","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Biomechanical study by using a multi-body simulation approach.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Objectification of spinal biomechanics after Vertebral Body Tethering with and without Apical Fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Vertebral body tethering, a motion preserving surgical technique for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, is increasingly being used for thoracolumbar curves. However, tether breakage remains a common problem with breakage rates up to 60% for TL curves. Therefore, surgeons have begun to adapt their surgical technique by fusing the apex. The short-term clinical studies show a significant reduction of the tether breakage rate to 10%, but little is known about the biomechanical reasons. Therefore, this study analyzes the intervertebral compression and tether force in a tethered spine without apical fusion and in a tethered spine with apical fusion between L1/2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-body simulation approach was chosen to analyze the biomechanical effects of two surgical techniques during different physiological movements. The tether and intervertebral compression forces in the different instrumented segments are once analyzed for a T10-L3 tethered spine and once for a T10-L3 tethered with additional L1/2 fusion using an intervertebral cage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VBT with apical fusion reduces the prevailing tether forces not only at the fused level by nearly 861 N, but also at the adjacent spinal segments by around 100 N. However, a significant increase in intervertebral compression force of approximately 706 N can be observed, especially at the adjacent spinal segments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>L1/2 fusion in a tethered spine reduces tether forces in adjacent segments and thus might decrease the rate of tether breakage. However, fusion results in increased intervertebral compression forces by up to 31% compared to an unfused spine. Long-term clinical studies are needed to further analyze and evaluate the biomechanical consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Biomechanical Effects of Vertebral Body Tethering with Apical Fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Jil Frank, Per David Trobisch, Miguel Pishnamaz, Frank Hildebrand, Maximilian Praster\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Biomechanical study by using a multi-body simulation approach.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Objectification of spinal biomechanics after Vertebral Body Tethering with and without Apical Fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Vertebral body tethering, a motion preserving surgical technique for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, is increasingly being used for thoracolumbar curves. However, tether breakage remains a common problem with breakage rates up to 60% for TL curves. Therefore, surgeons have begun to adapt their surgical technique by fusing the apex. The short-term clinical studies show a significant reduction of the tether breakage rate to 10%, but little is known about the biomechanical reasons. Therefore, this study analyzes the intervertebral compression and tether force in a tethered spine without apical fusion and in a tethered spine with apical fusion between L1/2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-body simulation approach was chosen to analyze the biomechanical effects of two surgical techniques during different physiological movements. The tether and intervertebral compression forces in the different instrumented segments are once analyzed for a T10-L3 tethered spine and once for a T10-L3 tethered with additional L1/2 fusion using an intervertebral cage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VBT with apical fusion reduces the prevailing tether forces not only at the fused level by nearly 861 N, but also at the adjacent spinal segments by around 100 N. However, a significant increase in intervertebral compression force of approximately 706 N can be observed, especially at the adjacent spinal segments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>L1/2 fusion in a tethered spine reduces tether forces in adjacent segments and thus might decrease the rate of tether breakage. However, fusion results in increased intervertebral compression forces by up to 31% compared to an unfused spine. Long-term clinical studies are needed to further analyze and evaluate the biomechanical consequences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005261\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:采用多体模拟方法进行生物力学研究。目的:探讨椎体系扎术伴和不伴椎体根尖融合术后脊柱生物力学的客观化。背景资料总结:椎体系扎术是一种用于纠正青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的运动保持手术技术,越来越多地用于胸腰椎弯曲。然而,系索断裂仍然是常见的问题,在TL曲线中断裂率高达60%。因此,外科医生已经开始通过融合尖端来调整他们的手术技术。短期临床研究显示系索断裂率显著降低至10%,但对生物力学原因知之甚少。因此,本研究分析了无根尖融合的栓系脊柱和L1/2间根尖融合的栓系脊柱的椎间压迫和栓系力。方法:采用多体模拟方法分析两种手术方式在不同生理运动下的生物力学效应。对T10-L3系留脊柱的不同固定节段的系留和椎间压缩力进行一次分析,对T10-L3系留并使用椎间笼进行额外的L1/2融合进行一次分析。结果:VBT根尖融合术不仅使融合节段的缆索力降低了近861 N,而且使相邻脊柱节段的缆索力降低了约100 N。然而,可以观察到椎间压缩力显著增加了约706 N,特别是在相邻脊柱节段。结论:L1/2融合在栓系脊柱中减少相邻节段的栓系力,从而可能降低栓系断裂的发生率。然而,与未融合的脊柱相比,融合导致椎间压缩力增加高达31%。需要长期的临床研究来进一步分析和评估生物力学后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the Biomechanical Effects of Vertebral Body Tethering with Apical Fusion.

Study design: Biomechanical study by using a multi-body simulation approach.

Objective: Objectification of spinal biomechanics after Vertebral Body Tethering with and without Apical Fusion.

Summary of background data: Vertebral body tethering, a motion preserving surgical technique for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, is increasingly being used for thoracolumbar curves. However, tether breakage remains a common problem with breakage rates up to 60% for TL curves. Therefore, surgeons have begun to adapt their surgical technique by fusing the apex. The short-term clinical studies show a significant reduction of the tether breakage rate to 10%, but little is known about the biomechanical reasons. Therefore, this study analyzes the intervertebral compression and tether force in a tethered spine without apical fusion and in a tethered spine with apical fusion between L1/2.

Methods: A multi-body simulation approach was chosen to analyze the biomechanical effects of two surgical techniques during different physiological movements. The tether and intervertebral compression forces in the different instrumented segments are once analyzed for a T10-L3 tethered spine and once for a T10-L3 tethered with additional L1/2 fusion using an intervertebral cage.

Results: VBT with apical fusion reduces the prevailing tether forces not only at the fused level by nearly 861 N, but also at the adjacent spinal segments by around 100 N. However, a significant increase in intervertebral compression force of approximately 706 N can be observed, especially at the adjacent spinal segments.

Conclusion: L1/2 fusion in a tethered spine reduces tether forces in adjacent segments and thus might decrease the rate of tether breakage. However, fusion results in increased intervertebral compression forces by up to 31% compared to an unfused spine. Long-term clinical studies are needed to further analyze and evaluate the biomechanical consequences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信