免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗治疗smarca4缺陷胸椎肿瘤的疗效和安全性回顾性研究

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-691
Bin Wang, Heng You, Dongfan Ye, Yuanyue Yi, Yu Liu, Bin Qing, Chuangye Wang, Jincheng Liu, Jian Zhang, Nanbo Wang, Pengfei Wan, Linlin Shen, Zhi Xu
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗治疗smarca4缺陷胸椎肿瘤的疗效和安全性回顾性研究","authors":"Bin Wang, Heng You, Dongfan Ye, Yuanyue Yi, Yu Liu, Bin Qing, Chuangye Wang, Jincheng Liu, Jian Zhang, Nanbo Wang, Pengfei Wan, Linlin Shen, Zhi Xu","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracic tumors characterized by a deficiency in SMARCA4 are highly aggressive and linked to a poor prognosis. This retrospective study explores the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy for SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors (SMARCA4-dUT) and SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancer (SMARCA4-dNSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 59 individuals was analyzed, including 35 patients with SMARCA4-dUT and 24 with SMARCA4-dNSCLC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical characteristics as gender, age, smoking status, and metastatic sites did not significantly vary between SMARCA4-dUT and SMARCA4-dNSCLC. Nonsense and frameshift mutations in the SMARCA4 gene can result in the loss of its protein expression. Following a median follow-up of 7.6 months, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) notably increased with ICIs-based combination therapy compared to chemotherapy, the mPFS was 12.60 <i>vs</i>. 4.03 months in the SMARCA4-dUT subgroup (P=0.007) and not reached <i>vs</i>. 3.42 months in the SMARCA4-dNSCLC subgroup (P=0.03). In stage IV patients, the risk of disease progression and death decreased with ICIs-based combination therapy <i>vs</i>. chemotherapy [ICIs-based therapy <i>vs</i>. chemotherapy: hazard ratio (HR) =0.076; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.009-0.624]. The most prevalent grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) in both groups were hematologic decreases, consistent with typical chemotherapy AEs. No treatment-related AEs led to patient fatalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of ICIs and chemotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy for patients with advanced SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors (SMARCA4-dTT), and the safety is manageable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"13 12","pages":"3460-3472"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective study of the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Bin Wang, Heng You, Dongfan Ye, Yuanyue Yi, Yu Liu, Bin Qing, Chuangye Wang, Jincheng Liu, Jian Zhang, Nanbo Wang, Pengfei Wan, Linlin Shen, Zhi Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tlcr-24-691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracic tumors characterized by a deficiency in SMARCA4 are highly aggressive and linked to a poor prognosis. This retrospective study explores the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy for SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors (SMARCA4-dUT) and SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancer (SMARCA4-dNSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 59 individuals was analyzed, including 35 patients with SMARCA4-dUT and 24 with SMARCA4-dNSCLC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical characteristics as gender, age, smoking status, and metastatic sites did not significantly vary between SMARCA4-dUT and SMARCA4-dNSCLC. Nonsense and frameshift mutations in the SMARCA4 gene can result in the loss of its protein expression. Following a median follow-up of 7.6 months, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) notably increased with ICIs-based combination therapy compared to chemotherapy, the mPFS was 12.60 <i>vs</i>. 4.03 months in the SMARCA4-dUT subgroup (P=0.007) and not reached <i>vs</i>. 3.42 months in the SMARCA4-dNSCLC subgroup (P=0.03). In stage IV patients, the risk of disease progression and death decreased with ICIs-based combination therapy <i>vs</i>. chemotherapy [ICIs-based therapy <i>vs</i>. chemotherapy: hazard ratio (HR) =0.076; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.009-0.624]. The most prevalent grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) in both groups were hematologic decreases, consistent with typical chemotherapy AEs. No treatment-related AEs led to patient fatalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of ICIs and chemotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy for patients with advanced SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors (SMARCA4-dTT), and the safety is manageable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"3460-3472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736595/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-691\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-691","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以SMARCA4缺乏为特征的胸部肿瘤具有高度侵袭性,与预后不良有关。这项回顾性研究探讨了免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合化疗治疗smarca4缺陷未分化肿瘤(SMARCA4-dUT)和smarca4缺陷非小细胞肺癌(SMARCA4-dNSCLC)的疗效和安全性。方法:对59例个体进行队列分析,包括35例SMARCA4-dUT患者和24例SMARCA4-dNSCLC患者。结果:临床特征如性别、年龄、吸烟状况和转移部位在SMARCA4-dUT和SMARCA4-dNSCLC之间没有显著差异。SMARCA4基因的无义突变和移码突变可导致其蛋白表达的缺失。在中位随访7.6个月后,与化疗相比,基于icis的联合治疗的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)显着增加,SMARCA4-dUT亚组的mPFS为12.60个月,而SMARCA4-dNSCLC亚组的mPFS为4.03个月(P=0.007),未达到,而SMARCA4-dNSCLC亚组的mPFS为3.42个月(P=0.03)。在IV期患者中,基于icis的联合治疗与化疗相比,疾病进展和死亡的风险降低[基于icis的治疗与化疗:风险比(HR) =0.076;95%置信区间(CI): 0.009-0.624]。两组中最常见的3级或以上不良事件(ae)是血液学下降,与典型的化疗ae一致。没有治疗相关的不良事件导致患者死亡。结论:对于晚期smarca4缺陷胸腔镜肿瘤(SMARCA4-dTT)患者,ICIs联合化疗比化疗更有效,且安全性可控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A retrospective study of the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors.

Background: Thoracic tumors characterized by a deficiency in SMARCA4 are highly aggressive and linked to a poor prognosis. This retrospective study explores the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy for SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors (SMARCA4-dUT) and SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancer (SMARCA4-dNSCLC).

Methods: A cohort of 59 individuals was analyzed, including 35 patients with SMARCA4-dUT and 24 with SMARCA4-dNSCLC.

Results: Clinical characteristics as gender, age, smoking status, and metastatic sites did not significantly vary between SMARCA4-dUT and SMARCA4-dNSCLC. Nonsense and frameshift mutations in the SMARCA4 gene can result in the loss of its protein expression. Following a median follow-up of 7.6 months, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) notably increased with ICIs-based combination therapy compared to chemotherapy, the mPFS was 12.60 vs. 4.03 months in the SMARCA4-dUT subgroup (P=0.007) and not reached vs. 3.42 months in the SMARCA4-dNSCLC subgroup (P=0.03). In stage IV patients, the risk of disease progression and death decreased with ICIs-based combination therapy vs. chemotherapy [ICIs-based therapy vs. chemotherapy: hazard ratio (HR) =0.076; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.009-0.624]. The most prevalent grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) in both groups were hematologic decreases, consistent with typical chemotherapy AEs. No treatment-related AEs led to patient fatalities.

Conclusions: The combination of ICIs and chemotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy for patients with advanced SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors (SMARCA4-dTT), and the safety is manageable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信