【护士作为负责任临床医生:机遇与挑战】。

Q4 Medicine
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2025-01-01
M J van Til, J M C van Dam, D G Hollands, M B de Koning
{"title":"【护士作为负责任临床医生:机遇与挑战】。","authors":"M J van Til, J M C van Dam, D G Hollands, M B de Koning","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Compulsory Mental Health Care Act in the Netherlands (CMHCA) came into effect in 2020. Mental health nurse practitioners have since been allowed to be &lsquo;responsible clinician&rsquo; However, there seems to be diversity in the implementation of the role in practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the state of affairs regarding the role of the mental health nurse practitioners as &lsquo;responsible clinician&rsquo; within the CMHCA and reflecting on this topic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Legislative texts, guidelines and professional associations have been consulted. The quality and professional statutes of eighteen large mental health institutions in the Netherlands were also studied, using the search terms &lsquo;responsible clinician&rsquo;, &lsquo;Compulsory Mental Health Care Act&rsquo;, &lsquo;nurse practitioner&rsquo;, &lsquo;CMHCA&rsquo;.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CMHCA leaves room for precise interpretation of the role of responsible clinician. In more than half of the quality and professional statutes examined (N=10), the role of responsible clinician is not specified. The other statutes (N = 8) include various frameworks for the role of a mental health nurse practitioner as responsible clinician.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The role of the nurse practitioner as responsible clinician is not clearly described in the statutes and guidelines reviewed. The CMHCA leaves room for how to fulfill this. We recommend a broad field consultation to arrive at clearer advice about which discipline is responsible clinician in which situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"67 1","pages":"28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The nurse practitioner as responsible clinician: opportunities and challenges].\",\"authors\":\"M J van Til, J M C van Dam, D G Hollands, M B de Koning\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Compulsory Mental Health Care Act in the Netherlands (CMHCA) came into effect in 2020. Mental health nurse practitioners have since been allowed to be &lsquo;responsible clinician&rsquo; However, there seems to be diversity in the implementation of the role in practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the state of affairs regarding the role of the mental health nurse practitioners as &lsquo;responsible clinician&rsquo; within the CMHCA and reflecting on this topic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Legislative texts, guidelines and professional associations have been consulted. The quality and professional statutes of eighteen large mental health institutions in the Netherlands were also studied, using the search terms &lsquo;responsible clinician&rsquo;, &lsquo;Compulsory Mental Health Care Act&rsquo;, &lsquo;nurse practitioner&rsquo;, &lsquo;CMHCA&rsquo;.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CMHCA leaves room for precise interpretation of the role of responsible clinician. In more than half of the quality and professional statutes examined (N=10), the role of responsible clinician is not specified. The other statutes (N = 8) include various frameworks for the role of a mental health nurse practitioner as responsible clinician.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The role of the nurse practitioner as responsible clinician is not clearly described in the statutes and guidelines reviewed. The CMHCA leaves room for how to fulfill this. We recommend a broad field consultation to arrive at clearer advice about which discipline is responsible clinician in which situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"28-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:荷兰《强制性精神卫生保健法》(CMHCA)于2020年生效。从那以后,精神健康护士从业人员被允许成为负责任的临床医生。然而,在实践中,角色的执行似乎存在多样性。目的:了解精神卫生执业护士作为“责任临床医生”的作用现状;在CMHCA内部并反思这个话题。方法:参考立法文本、指南和专业协会。还研究了荷兰18家大型精神卫生机构的质量和专业法规,使用搜索词&lsquo;负责任临床医生&lsquo; &lsquo;强制性精神卫生保健法&lsquo; &lsquo;执业护士&lsquo; ‘CMHCA&rsquo;。结果:CMHCA为责任临床医生的角色的精确解释留下了空间。在超过一半的质量和专业法规检查(N=10),负责任的临床医生的作用没有规定。其他法规(N = 8)包括关于精神卫生执业护士作为负责任临床医生的作用的各种框架。结论:执业护士作为负责任的临床医生的角色在法规和指南中没有明确描述。CMHCA为如何实现这一目标留下了空间。我们建议进行广泛的领域咨询,以获得更明确的建议,即在哪种情况下,哪个学科是负责任的临床医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The nurse practitioner as responsible clinician: opportunities and challenges].

Background: The Compulsory Mental Health Care Act in the Netherlands (CMHCA) came into effect in 2020. Mental health nurse practitioners have since been allowed to be ‘responsible clinician’ However, there seems to be diversity in the implementation of the role in practice.

Aim: To investigate the state of affairs regarding the role of the mental health nurse practitioners as ‘responsible clinician’ within the CMHCA and reflecting on this topic.

Method: Legislative texts, guidelines and professional associations have been consulted. The quality and professional statutes of eighteen large mental health institutions in the Netherlands were also studied, using the search terms ‘responsible clinician’, ‘Compulsory Mental Health Care Act’, ‘nurse practitioner’, ‘CMHCA’.

Results: The CMHCA leaves room for precise interpretation of the role of responsible clinician. In more than half of the quality and professional statutes examined (N=10), the role of responsible clinician is not specified. The other statutes (N = 8) include various frameworks for the role of a mental health nurse practitioner as responsible clinician.

Conclusion: The role of the nurse practitioner as responsible clinician is not clearly described in the statutes and guidelines reviewed. The CMHCA leaves room for how to fulfill this. We recommend a broad field consultation to arrive at clearer advice about which discipline is responsible clinician in which situation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信