间歇性的血压值记录不能提供持续静脉给药期间血流动力学反应的全面评价。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Brittany R Doyle, Emerson B Nairon, Erica Jones, Amber Salter, DaiWai M Olson
{"title":"间歇性的血压值记录不能提供持续静脉给药期间血流动力学反应的全面评价。","authors":"Brittany R Doyle, Emerson B Nairon, Erica Jones, Amber Salter, DaiWai M Olson","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-87606-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood pressure (BP) is a dynamic measure that is frequently discussed in static terms. There exist many limitations in current documentation systems whereby documented BP values may not be reflective of the dynamic variability of BP. This study used an observational, prospective, non-randomized study design to examine the variability in BP response during intravenous vasoactive medication administration in an intensive care unit setting. Subjects admitted to a neuroscience intensive care unit were monitored continuously during a 12-hour period. The BP values include systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure. Intermittent values from an intra-arterial figurecatheter (a-line) and continuously sampled values from an a-line obtained using continuous data acquisition (CDA) software, were compared to intermittently sampling of cuff-based BP measurements documented in the medical record. The 30 patients provided 1,220,511 BP observations from CDA, 944 from a-line documentation, and 416 from cuff-based BP documentation. The systolic BP was used as a goal parameter for 23 (77%) of the patients. Repeated measures models demonstrated that on average cuff-based differed from intermittent a-line and from CDA (p < .005) for all BP values. No differences between a-line and CDA were observed. Concordance correlation coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.72 for a-line, cuff-based BP, and CDA, indicating moderate agreement. Using intermittently documented BP values does not fully represent the dynamic nature of BP over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"2741"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intermittent documentation of blood pressure values does not provide comprehensive evaluation of the hemodynamic response during continuous intravenous medication administration.\",\"authors\":\"Brittany R Doyle, Emerson B Nairon, Erica Jones, Amber Salter, DaiWai M Olson\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-87606-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Blood pressure (BP) is a dynamic measure that is frequently discussed in static terms. There exist many limitations in current documentation systems whereby documented BP values may not be reflective of the dynamic variability of BP. This study used an observational, prospective, non-randomized study design to examine the variability in BP response during intravenous vasoactive medication administration in an intensive care unit setting. Subjects admitted to a neuroscience intensive care unit were monitored continuously during a 12-hour period. The BP values include systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure. Intermittent values from an intra-arterial figurecatheter (a-line) and continuously sampled values from an a-line obtained using continuous data acquisition (CDA) software, were compared to intermittently sampling of cuff-based BP measurements documented in the medical record. The 30 patients provided 1,220,511 BP observations from CDA, 944 from a-line documentation, and 416 from cuff-based BP documentation. The systolic BP was used as a goal parameter for 23 (77%) of the patients. Repeated measures models demonstrated that on average cuff-based differed from intermittent a-line and from CDA (p < .005) for all BP values. No differences between a-line and CDA were observed. Concordance correlation coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.72 for a-line, cuff-based BP, and CDA, indicating moderate agreement. Using intermittently documented BP values does not fully represent the dynamic nature of BP over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"2741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751090/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87606-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87606-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血压(BP)是一种动态测量,经常以静态术语讨论。目前的文件系统存在许多局限性,因此记录的BP值可能不能反映BP的动态变化。本研究采用观察性、前瞻性、非随机研究设计,研究重症监护病房静脉注射血管活性药物时血压反应的变异性。进入神经科学重症监护病房的受试者在12小时内被连续监测。血压值包括收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压。动脉内数字导管(a线)的间歇值和使用连续数据采集(CDA)软件获得的a线连续采样值,与医疗记录中记录的间歇采样袖带血压测量值进行比较。30例患者通过CDA提供了1,220,511个血压观察值,944个来自a-line记录,416个来自袖带血压记录。收缩压作为23例(77%)患者的目标参数。重复测量模型表明,平均而言,基于袖带的差异于间歇性a线和CDA (p . 539)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intermittent documentation of blood pressure values does not provide comprehensive evaluation of the hemodynamic response during continuous intravenous medication administration.

Intermittent documentation of blood pressure values does not provide comprehensive evaluation of the hemodynamic response during continuous intravenous medication administration.

Intermittent documentation of blood pressure values does not provide comprehensive evaluation of the hemodynamic response during continuous intravenous medication administration.

Blood pressure (BP) is a dynamic measure that is frequently discussed in static terms. There exist many limitations in current documentation systems whereby documented BP values may not be reflective of the dynamic variability of BP. This study used an observational, prospective, non-randomized study design to examine the variability in BP response during intravenous vasoactive medication administration in an intensive care unit setting. Subjects admitted to a neuroscience intensive care unit were monitored continuously during a 12-hour period. The BP values include systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure. Intermittent values from an intra-arterial figurecatheter (a-line) and continuously sampled values from an a-line obtained using continuous data acquisition (CDA) software, were compared to intermittently sampling of cuff-based BP measurements documented in the medical record. The 30 patients provided 1,220,511 BP observations from CDA, 944 from a-line documentation, and 416 from cuff-based BP documentation. The systolic BP was used as a goal parameter for 23 (77%) of the patients. Repeated measures models demonstrated that on average cuff-based differed from intermittent a-line and from CDA (p < .005) for all BP values. No differences between a-line and CDA were observed. Concordance correlation coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.72 for a-line, cuff-based BP, and CDA, indicating moderate agreement. Using intermittently documented BP values does not fully represent the dynamic nature of BP over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信