Xinlei Huang, Goutam Saha, Akshoy Ranjan Paul, Adele Tahan, Suvash C Saha
{"title":"基于ct呼吸道模型的BiPAP压力设置对气道生物力学的计算流体动力学分析。","authors":"Xinlei Huang, Goutam Saha, Akshoy Ranjan Paul, Adele Tahan, Suvash C Saha","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2025.104397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (CSA and OSA), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) disrupt breathing patterns, posing significant health risks and reducing the quality of life. Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) therapy offers adjustable inhalation and exhalation pressures, potentially enhancing treatment adaptability for the above diseases. This is the first-ever study that employs Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to examine the biomechanical impacts of BiPAP under four settings: Inspiratory Positive Airway Pressure (IPAP)/Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) of 12/8, 16/6, and 18/8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, compared to a without-BiPAP scenario of zero-gauge pressure. Utilizing a computed-tomography-based respiratory tract model from the nasal cavity extending to the 13th generation, we analyzed parameters such as static pressure, shear stress, and airway wall normal force across different airway regions. Our results indicate that BiPAP, particularly at higher IPAP settings, effectively increases static pressure, thereby improving airway patency and potentially reducing the risk of airway collapse in both CSA and OSA. Lower EPAP, on the other hand, helps reduce the work of breathing during exhalation, which is particularly useful for patients who have difficulty exhaling against higher pressures or need to exhale CO<sub>2</sub> more effectively. This comparative analysis confirms that BiPAP not only maintains open airways but does so with an adjustable approach that can be used for the specific needs of patients with various respiratory dysfunctions, thereby offering a versatile and effective treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":" ","pages":"104397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of BiPAP Pressure Settings on Airway Biomechanics Using a CT-Based Respiratory Tract Model.\",\"authors\":\"Xinlei Huang, Goutam Saha, Akshoy Ranjan Paul, Adele Tahan, Suvash C Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resp.2025.104397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Central and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (CSA and OSA), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) disrupt breathing patterns, posing significant health risks and reducing the quality of life. Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) therapy offers adjustable inhalation and exhalation pressures, potentially enhancing treatment adaptability for the above diseases. This is the first-ever study that employs Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to examine the biomechanical impacts of BiPAP under four settings: Inspiratory Positive Airway Pressure (IPAP)/Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) of 12/8, 16/6, and 18/8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, compared to a without-BiPAP scenario of zero-gauge pressure. Utilizing a computed-tomography-based respiratory tract model from the nasal cavity extending to the 13th generation, we analyzed parameters such as static pressure, shear stress, and airway wall normal force across different airway regions. Our results indicate that BiPAP, particularly at higher IPAP settings, effectively increases static pressure, thereby improving airway patency and potentially reducing the risk of airway collapse in both CSA and OSA. Lower EPAP, on the other hand, helps reduce the work of breathing during exhalation, which is particularly useful for patients who have difficulty exhaling against higher pressures or need to exhale CO<sub>2</sub> more effectively. This comparative analysis confirms that BiPAP not only maintains open airways but does so with an adjustable approach that can be used for the specific needs of patients with various respiratory dysfunctions, thereby offering a versatile and effective treatment option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2025.104397\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2025.104397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of BiPAP Pressure Settings on Airway Biomechanics Using a CT-Based Respiratory Tract Model.
Central and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (CSA and OSA), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) disrupt breathing patterns, posing significant health risks and reducing the quality of life. Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) therapy offers adjustable inhalation and exhalation pressures, potentially enhancing treatment adaptability for the above diseases. This is the first-ever study that employs Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to examine the biomechanical impacts of BiPAP under four settings: Inspiratory Positive Airway Pressure (IPAP)/Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) of 12/8, 16/6, and 18/8 cmH2O, compared to a without-BiPAP scenario of zero-gauge pressure. Utilizing a computed-tomography-based respiratory tract model from the nasal cavity extending to the 13th generation, we analyzed parameters such as static pressure, shear stress, and airway wall normal force across different airway regions. Our results indicate that BiPAP, particularly at higher IPAP settings, effectively increases static pressure, thereby improving airway patency and potentially reducing the risk of airway collapse in both CSA and OSA. Lower EPAP, on the other hand, helps reduce the work of breathing during exhalation, which is particularly useful for patients who have difficulty exhaling against higher pressures or need to exhale CO2 more effectively. This comparative analysis confirms that BiPAP not only maintains open airways but does so with an adjustable approach that can be used for the specific needs of patients with various respiratory dysfunctions, thereby offering a versatile and effective treatment option.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense.
Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as:
-Mechanics of breathing-
Gas exchange and acid-base balance-
Respiration at rest and exercise-
Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen-
Embryonic and adult respiration-
Comparative respiratory physiology.
Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.