组织蛋白酶与肾癌可能性的相关性:一项孟德尔随机研究。

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tuo Peng, Tian Li, Caihua Zhang
{"title":"组织蛋白酶与肾癌可能性的相关性:一项孟德尔随机研究。","authors":"Tuo Peng, Tian Li, Caihua Zhang","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have established a relationship between cathepsins and renal cancer. Nonetheless, the specific causal connection between the two factors continues to be ambiguous. The aim of this study is to evaluate the causal relationship between cathepsins and renal cancer via employing Mendelian randomization (MR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The summary data of genome-wide association study were used for univariable MR (UVMR), reverse MR, and multivariable MR (MVMR) analyses. The primary MR method used in this study was Inverse variance weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UVMR analysis showed that cathepsin Z increased the overall risk of renal cancer and cathepsin F were observed increased the risk of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, the concentration of cathepsin S had a significant positive correlation with the risk of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), whereas that of cathepsin G was negatively correlated with the risk of pRCC. Reverse MR analysis showed that renal cancer reduced the concentration of cathepsin H. MVMR analysis showed that the concentration of cathepsin B had a significant positive correlation with overall risk of renal cancer and pRCC. In addition, a higher concentration of cathepsin S was significantly associated with an increased risk of pRCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed a direct link between cathepsins and the risk of renal cancer. Specifically, cathepsin S has a significant positive correlation with the risk of pRCC. The findings of our research could provide significant contributions to both fundamental and clinical investigations pertaining to renal cancer. Key message What is already known on this topic? - Previous studies have suggested the role of some cathepsins in renal cancer occurrence and progression. However, the causal link between different cathepsins and renal cancer is unknown. What this study adds? - Our Mendelian randomization (MR) study revealed that the effects of different cathepsins on the risk of renal cancer. Remarkably, both univariable MR and multivariable MR demonstrated that the levels of cathepsin S increases the risk of papillary renal cell carcinoma. How this study might affect research, practice or policy? - The findings offer novel insights into the relationship between cathepsins and renal cancer, which may have implications for the prevention and management of renal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between cathepsins and the likelihood of renal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.\",\"authors\":\"Tuo Peng, Tian Li, Caihua Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/postmj/qgaf003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have established a relationship between cathepsins and renal cancer. Nonetheless, the specific causal connection between the two factors continues to be ambiguous. The aim of this study is to evaluate the causal relationship between cathepsins and renal cancer via employing Mendelian randomization (MR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The summary data of genome-wide association study were used for univariable MR (UVMR), reverse MR, and multivariable MR (MVMR) analyses. The primary MR method used in this study was Inverse variance weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UVMR analysis showed that cathepsin Z increased the overall risk of renal cancer and cathepsin F were observed increased the risk of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, the concentration of cathepsin S had a significant positive correlation with the risk of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), whereas that of cathepsin G was negatively correlated with the risk of pRCC. Reverse MR analysis showed that renal cancer reduced the concentration of cathepsin H. MVMR analysis showed that the concentration of cathepsin B had a significant positive correlation with overall risk of renal cancer and pRCC. In addition, a higher concentration of cathepsin S was significantly associated with an increased risk of pRCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed a direct link between cathepsins and the risk of renal cancer. Specifically, cathepsin S has a significant positive correlation with the risk of pRCC. The findings of our research could provide significant contributions to both fundamental and clinical investigations pertaining to renal cancer. Key message What is already known on this topic? - Previous studies have suggested the role of some cathepsins in renal cancer occurrence and progression. However, the causal link between different cathepsins and renal cancer is unknown. What this study adds? - Our Mendelian randomization (MR) study revealed that the effects of different cathepsins on the risk of renal cancer. Remarkably, both univariable MR and multivariable MR demonstrated that the levels of cathepsin S increases the risk of papillary renal cell carcinoma. How this study might affect research, practice or policy? - The findings offer novel insights into the relationship between cathepsins and renal cancer, which may have implications for the prevention and management of renal cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以往的研究已经确立了组织蛋白酶与肾癌的关系。尽管如此,这两个因素之间的具体因果关系仍然模糊不清。本研究的目的是通过孟德尔随机化(MR)来评估组织蛋白酶与肾癌之间的因果关系。方法:采用全基因组关联研究汇总数据进行单变量MR (UVMR)、反向MR (reverse MR)和多变量MR (MVMR)分析。本研究中使用的主要MR方法是逆方差加权。结果:UVMR分析显示,组织蛋白酶Z增加了肾癌的总体风险,组织蛋白酶F增加了透明细胞肾癌的风险。此外,组织蛋白酶S浓度与乳头状肾细胞癌(pRCC)发生风险呈显著正相关,而组织蛋白酶G浓度与pRCC发生风险呈显著负相关。反向MR分析显示,肾癌降低了组织蛋白酶h的浓度。MVMR分析显示,组织蛋白酶B的浓度与肾癌和pRCC的总体风险呈显著正相关。此外,较高浓度的组织蛋白酶S与pRCC风险增加显著相关。结论:本研究证实了组织蛋白酶与肾癌风险之间的直接联系。具体而言,组织蛋白酶S与pRCC的发病风险有显著正相关。我们的研究结果可以为肾癌的基础和临床研究提供重要的贡献。关于这个话题我们已经知道了什么?-先前的研究表明一些组织蛋白酶在肾癌的发生和发展中的作用。然而,不同组织蛋白酶与肾癌之间的因果关系尚不清楚。这项研究补充了什么?我们的孟德尔随机化(MR)研究揭示了不同组织蛋白酶对肾癌风险的影响。值得注意的是,单变量MR和多变量MR均显示组织蛋白酶S水平增加了乳头状肾细胞癌的风险。这项研究将如何影响研究、实践或政策?研究结果为组织蛋白酶与肾癌之间的关系提供了新的见解,这可能对肾癌的预防和治疗具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between cathepsins and the likelihood of renal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.

Background: Previous studies have established a relationship between cathepsins and renal cancer. Nonetheless, the specific causal connection between the two factors continues to be ambiguous. The aim of this study is to evaluate the causal relationship between cathepsins and renal cancer via employing Mendelian randomization (MR).

Methods: The summary data of genome-wide association study were used for univariable MR (UVMR), reverse MR, and multivariable MR (MVMR) analyses. The primary MR method used in this study was Inverse variance weighting.

Results: UVMR analysis showed that cathepsin Z increased the overall risk of renal cancer and cathepsin F were observed increased the risk of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, the concentration of cathepsin S had a significant positive correlation with the risk of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), whereas that of cathepsin G was negatively correlated with the risk of pRCC. Reverse MR analysis showed that renal cancer reduced the concentration of cathepsin H. MVMR analysis showed that the concentration of cathepsin B had a significant positive correlation with overall risk of renal cancer and pRCC. In addition, a higher concentration of cathepsin S was significantly associated with an increased risk of pRCC.

Conclusion: This study confirmed a direct link between cathepsins and the risk of renal cancer. Specifically, cathepsin S has a significant positive correlation with the risk of pRCC. The findings of our research could provide significant contributions to both fundamental and clinical investigations pertaining to renal cancer. Key message What is already known on this topic? - Previous studies have suggested the role of some cathepsins in renal cancer occurrence and progression. However, the causal link between different cathepsins and renal cancer is unknown. What this study adds? - Our Mendelian randomization (MR) study revealed that the effects of different cathepsins on the risk of renal cancer. Remarkably, both univariable MR and multivariable MR demonstrated that the levels of cathepsin S increases the risk of papillary renal cell carcinoma. How this study might affect research, practice or policy? - The findings offer novel insights into the relationship between cathepsins and renal cancer, which may have implications for the prevention and management of renal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信