外周神经刺激治疗截肢后难治性疼痛的疗效综述。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13309
Peter D Vu, Diana Ekechukwu, Ovie Enaohwo, Catherine Nguyen, Dominic Vu, Michael V Nguyen
{"title":"外周神经刺激治疗截肢后难治性疼痛的疗效综述。","authors":"Peter D Vu, Diana Ekechukwu, Ovie Enaohwo, Catherine Nguyen, Dominic Vu, Michael V Nguyen","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of postamputation pain remains a significant clinical challenge, with existing therapeutic approaches often yielding inconsistent outcomes. Neuromodulation techniques, particularly peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), have emerged as promising interventions. However, the evidence supporting their effectiveness in treating phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) remains limited. This narrative review consolidates previous findings of PNS as a postamputation agent and amasses the most recent data on its effectiveness in clinical settings. A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, yielding 115 references. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion criteria, three studies were included. The studies reviewed demonstrate that PNS can offer varying degrees of sustained pain relief, mood enhancement, reduction in opioid use, and functional improvement. However, discrepancies in study design, patient demographics, devices used, and methodological approaches significantly limit the generalizability and reliability of these findings. Currently, the evidence supporting PNS for the treatment of RLP and PLP is limited, with minimal data affirming its efficacy in alleviating postamputation pain and related symptoms. More studies, especially larger, well-designed comparative and observational studies are needed to extrapolate these conclusions for PNS and postamputation pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation in refractory postamputation pain: A narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Peter D Vu, Diana Ekechukwu, Ovie Enaohwo, Catherine Nguyen, Dominic Vu, Michael V Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The management of postamputation pain remains a significant clinical challenge, with existing therapeutic approaches often yielding inconsistent outcomes. Neuromodulation techniques, particularly peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), have emerged as promising interventions. However, the evidence supporting their effectiveness in treating phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) remains limited. This narrative review consolidates previous findings of PNS as a postamputation agent and amasses the most recent data on its effectiveness in clinical settings. A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, yielding 115 references. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion criteria, three studies were included. The studies reviewed demonstrate that PNS can offer varying degrees of sustained pain relief, mood enhancement, reduction in opioid use, and functional improvement. However, discrepancies in study design, patient demographics, devices used, and methodological approaches significantly limit the generalizability and reliability of these findings. Currently, the evidence supporting PNS for the treatment of RLP and PLP is limited, with minimal data affirming its efficacy in alleviating postamputation pain and related symptoms. More studies, especially larger, well-designed comparative and observational studies are needed to extrapolate these conclusions for PNS and postamputation pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13309\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

截肢后疼痛的处理仍然是一个重大的临床挑战,现有的治疗方法往往产生不一致的结果。神经调节技术,特别是周围神经刺激(PNS),已经成为一种有前途的干预手段。然而,支持其治疗幻肢痛(PLP)和残肢痛(RLP)有效性的证据仍然有限。这篇叙述性综述巩固了PNS作为截肢后药物的先前发现,并收集了其在临床环境中有效性的最新数据。通过PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane Library使用MEDLINE进行文献综述,共获得115篇参考文献。在剔除重复项并应用纳入标准后,纳入了3项研究。回顾的研究表明,PNS可以提供不同程度的持续疼痛缓解,情绪增强,减少阿片类药物使用和功能改善。然而,研究设计、患者人口统计学、使用的器械和方法学方法的差异极大地限制了这些发现的普遍性和可靠性。目前,支持PNS治疗RLP和PLP的证据有限,很少有数据证实其缓解截肢后疼痛和相关症状的有效性。需要更多的研究,特别是更大的、设计良好的比较和观察性研究来推断PNS和截肢后疼痛的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation in refractory postamputation pain: A narrative review.

The management of postamputation pain remains a significant clinical challenge, with existing therapeutic approaches often yielding inconsistent outcomes. Neuromodulation techniques, particularly peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), have emerged as promising interventions. However, the evidence supporting their effectiveness in treating phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) remains limited. This narrative review consolidates previous findings of PNS as a postamputation agent and amasses the most recent data on its effectiveness in clinical settings. A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, yielding 115 references. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion criteria, three studies were included. The studies reviewed demonstrate that PNS can offer varying degrees of sustained pain relief, mood enhancement, reduction in opioid use, and functional improvement. However, discrepancies in study design, patient demographics, devices used, and methodological approaches significantly limit the generalizability and reliability of these findings. Currently, the evidence supporting PNS for the treatment of RLP and PLP is limited, with minimal data affirming its efficacy in alleviating postamputation pain and related symptoms. More studies, especially larger, well-designed comparative and observational studies are needed to extrapolate these conclusions for PNS and postamputation pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信