RDC/TMD和DC/TMD中I轴颞下颌疾病的患病率和比较:一项横断面研究

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Merve Çakir, Gül Merve Yalçin Ülker, Özgür Erdoğan
{"title":"RDC/TMD和DC/TMD中I轴颞下颌疾病的患病率和比较:一项横断面研究","authors":"Merve Çakir, Gül Merve Yalçin Ülker, Özgür Erdoğan","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5938256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of different temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) diagnoses according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and to compare the diagnoses according to both guidelines.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Clinical examinations of 218 patients with TMD complaints were conducted according to both guidelines. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze the frequency of diagnoses and differences between the guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients diagnosed with TMD were women and middle-aged. The number of patients in the myofascial pain class was significantly lower for the RDC/TMD classification than for the DC/TMD classification (p=0.045). The number of patients in the disc displacement with reduction (DDWR) category was significantly higher for the RDC/TMD classification than for the DC/TMD classification (p<0.001). Other categories did not exhibit differences between the classifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women and middle-aged individuals are more affected by TMDs. Pain-related TMDs were the most common diagnosis, followed by DDWR according to DC/TMD. According to the RDC/TMD classification, myofascial pain, arthralgia, and DDWR were the most commonly observed diagnoses, respectively. Significant differences were observed between the pain-related TMD and DDWR groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and comparison of temporomandibular disorders according to axis I in RDC/TMD and DC/TMD: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Merve Çakir, Gül Merve Yalçin Ülker, Özgür Erdoğan\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.qi.b5938256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of different temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) diagnoses according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and to compare the diagnoses according to both guidelines.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Clinical examinations of 218 patients with TMD complaints were conducted according to both guidelines. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze the frequency of diagnoses and differences between the guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients diagnosed with TMD were women and middle-aged. The number of patients in the myofascial pain class was significantly lower for the RDC/TMD classification than for the DC/TMD classification (p=0.045). The number of patients in the disc displacement with reduction (DDWR) category was significantly higher for the RDC/TMD classification than for the DC/TMD classification (p<0.001). Other categories did not exhibit differences between the classifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women and middle-aged individuals are more affected by TMDs. Pain-related TMDs were the most common diagnosis, followed by DDWR according to DC/TMD. According to the RDC/TMD classification, myofascial pain, arthralgia, and DDWR were the most commonly observed diagnoses, respectively. Significant differences were observed between the pain-related TMD and DDWR groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quintessence international\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quintessence international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5938256\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5938256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估根据《颞下颌疾病诊断标准》(DC/TMD)和《颞下颌疾病研究诊断标准》(RDC/TMD)诊断不同颞下颌疾病(TMD)的患病率,并比较两种诊断标准的诊断结果。方法与材料:对218例TMD主诉患者进行临床检查。描述性统计分析诊断频率和指南之间的差异。结果:TMD患者以女性和中年人居多。RDC/TMD分类的肌筋膜疼痛患者数量明显低于DC/TMD分类(p=0.045)。RDC/TMD分类中椎间盘复位移位(DDWR)分类的患者数量明显高于DC/TMD分类(p结论:女性和中年人更易患TMDs。疼痛相关的TMD是最常见的诊断,其次是根据DC/TMD的DDWR。根据RDC/TMD分类,肌筋膜疼痛、关节痛和DDWR分别是最常见的诊断。与疼痛相关的TMD与DDWR组之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence and comparison of temporomandibular disorders according to axis I in RDC/TMD and DC/TMD: a cross-sectional study.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of different temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) diagnoses according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and to compare the diagnoses according to both guidelines.

Method and materials: Clinical examinations of 218 patients with TMD complaints were conducted according to both guidelines. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze the frequency of diagnoses and differences between the guidelines.

Results: Most patients diagnosed with TMD were women and middle-aged. The number of patients in the myofascial pain class was significantly lower for the RDC/TMD classification than for the DC/TMD classification (p=0.045). The number of patients in the disc displacement with reduction (DDWR) category was significantly higher for the RDC/TMD classification than for the DC/TMD classification (p<0.001). Other categories did not exhibit differences between the classifications.

Conclusion: Women and middle-aged individuals are more affected by TMDs. Pain-related TMDs were the most common diagnosis, followed by DDWR according to DC/TMD. According to the RDC/TMD classification, myofascial pain, arthralgia, and DDWR were the most commonly observed diagnoses, respectively. Significant differences were observed between the pain-related TMD and DDWR groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信