Suyun Nam, Marc W van Iersel, Rhuanito Soranz Ferrarezi
{"title":"利用叶片叶绿素荧光实时监测进行光合照明的生物反馈控制。","authors":"Suyun Nam, Marc W van Iersel, Rhuanito Soranz Ferrarezi","doi":"10.1111/ppl.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimizing photosynthetic lighting is essential for maximizing crop production and minimizing electricity costs in controlled environment agriculture (CEA). Traditional lighting methods often neglect the impact of environmental factors, crop type, and light acclimation on photosynthetic efficiency. To address this, a chlorophyll fluorescence-based biofeedback system was developed to adjust light-emitting diode (LED) intensity based on real-time plant responses, rather than using a fixed photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD). This study used the biofeedback system to maintain a range of target quantum yield of photosystem II (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>) and electron transport rate (ETR) values and to examine if the adjustment logic (Φ<sub>PSII</sub> or ETR-based) and crop type influence LED light intensity. The system was tested in a growth chamber with lettuce (Lactuca sativa) 'Green Towers' and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) 'Diva' to maintain six ETR levels (30, 50, 70, 90, 110, 130 μmol·m<sup>-2</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup>) and five Φ<sub>PSII</sub> levels (0.65, 0.675, 0.7, 0.725, 0.75) during a 16-hour photoperiod. The ETR-based biofeedback quickly stabilized the target ETR within 30-45 minutes, whereas the Φ<sub>PSII</sub>-based system needed more time. The system adjusted light intensities according to target values, acclimation status, and crop-specific responses. For example, to maintain a target ETR of 130 μmol·m<sup>-2</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup>, the gradual increase in Φ<sub>PSII</sub> over time due to light acclimation allowed the required PPFD to decrease by 35 μmol·m<sup>-2</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup>. Lettuce showed higher photosynthetic efficiency and lower heat dissipation than cucumber, leading to higher PPFD adjustments for lettuce. This biofeedback system effectively controls LED light, optimizing photosynthetic efficiency and potentially reducing lighting costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20164,"journal":{"name":"Physiologia plantarum","volume":"177 1","pages":"e70073"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biofeedback control of photosynthetic lighting using real-time monitoring of leaf chlorophyll fluorescence.\",\"authors\":\"Suyun Nam, Marc W van Iersel, Rhuanito Soranz Ferrarezi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ppl.70073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Optimizing photosynthetic lighting is essential for maximizing crop production and minimizing electricity costs in controlled environment agriculture (CEA). Traditional lighting methods often neglect the impact of environmental factors, crop type, and light acclimation on photosynthetic efficiency. To address this, a chlorophyll fluorescence-based biofeedback system was developed to adjust light-emitting diode (LED) intensity based on real-time plant responses, rather than using a fixed photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD). This study used the biofeedback system to maintain a range of target quantum yield of photosystem II (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>) and electron transport rate (ETR) values and to examine if the adjustment logic (Φ<sub>PSII</sub> or ETR-based) and crop type influence LED light intensity. The system was tested in a growth chamber with lettuce (Lactuca sativa) 'Green Towers' and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) 'Diva' to maintain six ETR levels (30, 50, 70, 90, 110, 130 μmol·m<sup>-2</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup>) and five Φ<sub>PSII</sub> levels (0.65, 0.675, 0.7, 0.725, 0.75) during a 16-hour photoperiod. The ETR-based biofeedback quickly stabilized the target ETR within 30-45 minutes, whereas the Φ<sub>PSII</sub>-based system needed more time. The system adjusted light intensities according to target values, acclimation status, and crop-specific responses. For example, to maintain a target ETR of 130 μmol·m<sup>-2</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup>, the gradual increase in Φ<sub>PSII</sub> over time due to light acclimation allowed the required PPFD to decrease by 35 μmol·m<sup>-2</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup>. Lettuce showed higher photosynthetic efficiency and lower heat dissipation than cucumber, leading to higher PPFD adjustments for lettuce. This biofeedback system effectively controls LED light, optimizing photosynthetic efficiency and potentially reducing lighting costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiologia plantarum\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"e70073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748110/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiologia plantarum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70073\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiologia plantarum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biofeedback control of photosynthetic lighting using real-time monitoring of leaf chlorophyll fluorescence.
Optimizing photosynthetic lighting is essential for maximizing crop production and minimizing electricity costs in controlled environment agriculture (CEA). Traditional lighting methods often neglect the impact of environmental factors, crop type, and light acclimation on photosynthetic efficiency. To address this, a chlorophyll fluorescence-based biofeedback system was developed to adjust light-emitting diode (LED) intensity based on real-time plant responses, rather than using a fixed photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD). This study used the biofeedback system to maintain a range of target quantum yield of photosystem II (ΦPSII) and electron transport rate (ETR) values and to examine if the adjustment logic (ΦPSII or ETR-based) and crop type influence LED light intensity. The system was tested in a growth chamber with lettuce (Lactuca sativa) 'Green Towers' and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) 'Diva' to maintain six ETR levels (30, 50, 70, 90, 110, 130 μmol·m-2·s-1) and five ΦPSII levels (0.65, 0.675, 0.7, 0.725, 0.75) during a 16-hour photoperiod. The ETR-based biofeedback quickly stabilized the target ETR within 30-45 minutes, whereas the ΦPSII-based system needed more time. The system adjusted light intensities according to target values, acclimation status, and crop-specific responses. For example, to maintain a target ETR of 130 μmol·m-2·s-1, the gradual increase in ΦPSII over time due to light acclimation allowed the required PPFD to decrease by 35 μmol·m-2·s-1. Lettuce showed higher photosynthetic efficiency and lower heat dissipation than cucumber, leading to higher PPFD adjustments for lettuce. This biofeedback system effectively controls LED light, optimizing photosynthetic efficiency and potentially reducing lighting costs.
期刊介绍:
Physiologia Plantarum is an international journal committed to publishing the best full-length original research papers that advance our understanding of primary mechanisms of plant development, growth and productivity as well as plant interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment. All organisational levels of experimental plant biology – from molecular and cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics to ecophysiology and global change biology – fall within the scope of the journal. The content is distributed between 5 main subject areas supervised by Subject Editors specialised in the respective domain: (1) biochemistry and metabolism, (2) ecophysiology, stress and adaptation, (3) uptake, transport and assimilation, (4) development, growth and differentiation, (5) photobiology and photosynthesis.