早产儿神经认知结果预测的机器学习模型。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Menne R van Boven, Frank C Bennis, Wes Onland, Cornelieke S H Aarnoudse-Moens, Max Frings, Kevin Tran, Trixie A Katz, Michelle Romijn, Mark Hoogendoorn, Anton H van Kaam, Aleid G Leemhuis, Jaap Oosterlaan, Marsh Königs
{"title":"早产儿神经认知结果预测的机器学习模型。","authors":"Menne R van Boven, Frank C Bennis, Wes Onland, Cornelieke S H Aarnoudse-Moens, Max Frings, Kevin Tran, Trixie A Katz, Michelle Romijn, Mark Hoogendoorn, Anton H van Kaam, Aleid G Leemhuis, Jaap Oosterlaan, Marsh Königs","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-03815-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcome prediction after preterm birth is important for long-term neonatal care, but has proven notoriously challenging for neurocognitive outcome. This study investigated the potential of machine learning to improve neurocognitive outcome prediction at two and five years of corrected age in preterm infants, using readily available predictors from the neonatal setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Predictors originating from the antenatal and neonatal period of preterm infants born <30 weeks gestation were used to predict adverse neurocognitive outcome on the Bayley Scale and Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Machine learning models were compared to conventional logistic regression and validated using internal cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Best performing models were a random forest (two-year outcome) and a support vector machine (five-year outcome) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.682 and 0.695 respectively, reaching high negative predictive values (95% and 91%, respectively). These models performed significantly better than the conventional models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The models reached moderate overall predictive performance, yet with promising potential for early identification of children without adverse neurocognitive outcome. Machine learning modestly improved neurocognitive outcome prediction. Future research may harvest the predictive potential of a wider variety of routine (clinical) data, such as vital sign time series.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Early prediction of neurocognitive outcome in preterm infants will enable targeted follow-up and deployment of early (preventative) interventions to improve outcome. Neurocognitive outcome remains notoriously challenging using conventional models, while existing machine learning models depend on advanced MRI-derived predictors with limited potential for implementation into daily clinical practice. This study developed machine learning models for neurocognitive outcome prediction using predictors that are readily available in neonatal settings. Neurocognitive outcome prediction remains challenging due to low AUC and PPV, however, the models demonstrate high NPV, indicating potential for identifying children at low risk for adverse outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning models for neurocognitive outcome prediction in preterm born infants.\",\"authors\":\"Menne R van Boven, Frank C Bennis, Wes Onland, Cornelieke S H Aarnoudse-Moens, Max Frings, Kevin Tran, Trixie A Katz, Michelle Romijn, Mark Hoogendoorn, Anton H van Kaam, Aleid G Leemhuis, Jaap Oosterlaan, Marsh Königs\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41390-025-03815-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcome prediction after preterm birth is important for long-term neonatal care, but has proven notoriously challenging for neurocognitive outcome. This study investigated the potential of machine learning to improve neurocognitive outcome prediction at two and five years of corrected age in preterm infants, using readily available predictors from the neonatal setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Predictors originating from the antenatal and neonatal period of preterm infants born <30 weeks gestation were used to predict adverse neurocognitive outcome on the Bayley Scale and Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Machine learning models were compared to conventional logistic regression and validated using internal cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Best performing models were a random forest (two-year outcome) and a support vector machine (five-year outcome) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.682 and 0.695 respectively, reaching high negative predictive values (95% and 91%, respectively). These models performed significantly better than the conventional models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The models reached moderate overall predictive performance, yet with promising potential for early identification of children without adverse neurocognitive outcome. Machine learning modestly improved neurocognitive outcome prediction. Future research may harvest the predictive potential of a wider variety of routine (clinical) data, such as vital sign time series.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Early prediction of neurocognitive outcome in preterm infants will enable targeted follow-up and deployment of early (preventative) interventions to improve outcome. Neurocognitive outcome remains notoriously challenging using conventional models, while existing machine learning models depend on advanced MRI-derived predictors with limited potential for implementation into daily clinical practice. This study developed machine learning models for neurocognitive outcome prediction using predictors that are readily available in neonatal settings. Neurocognitive outcome prediction remains challenging due to low AUC and PPV, however, the models demonstrate high NPV, indicating potential for identifying children at low risk for adverse outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-03815-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-03815-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早产后的预后预测对长期新生儿护理很重要,但已证明对神经认知结果具有众所周知的挑战性。本研究调查了机器学习在早产儿2岁和5岁矫正年龄时改善神经认知结果预测的潜力,使用了新生儿环境中现成的预测因子。结果:表现最好的模型为随机森林模型(2年预后)和支持向量机模型(5年预后),其受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.682和0.695,具有较高的负预测值(分别为95%和91%)。这些模型的性能明显优于传统模型。结论:该模型达到了中等的整体预测性能,但在早期识别无不良神经认知结果的儿童方面具有很大的潜力。机器学习适度改善了神经认知结果预测。未来的研究可能会收获更广泛的常规(临床)数据的预测潜力,如生命体征时间序列。影响:早期预测早产儿的神经认知结果将使有针对性的随访和早期(预防性)干预措施的部署,以改善结果。众所周知,使用传统模型的神经认知结果仍然具有挑战性,而现有的机器学习模型依赖于先进的mri衍生预测因子,在日常临床实践中的应用潜力有限。本研究开发了神经认知结果预测的机器学习模型,使用在新生儿环境中容易获得的预测因子。由于AUC和PPV较低,神经认知结果预测仍然具有挑战性,然而,该模型显示出较高的NPV,表明有可能识别出不良结果风险较低的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning models for neurocognitive outcome prediction in preterm born infants.

Background: Outcome prediction after preterm birth is important for long-term neonatal care, but has proven notoriously challenging for neurocognitive outcome. This study investigated the potential of machine learning to improve neurocognitive outcome prediction at two and five years of corrected age in preterm infants, using readily available predictors from the neonatal setting.

Methods: Predictors originating from the antenatal and neonatal period of preterm infants born <30 weeks gestation were used to predict adverse neurocognitive outcome on the Bayley Scale and Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Machine learning models were compared to conventional logistic regression and validated using internal cross-validation.

Results: Best performing models were a random forest (two-year outcome) and a support vector machine (five-year outcome) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.682 and 0.695 respectively, reaching high negative predictive values (95% and 91%, respectively). These models performed significantly better than the conventional models.

Conclusions: The models reached moderate overall predictive performance, yet with promising potential for early identification of children without adverse neurocognitive outcome. Machine learning modestly improved neurocognitive outcome prediction. Future research may harvest the predictive potential of a wider variety of routine (clinical) data, such as vital sign time series.

Impact: Early prediction of neurocognitive outcome in preterm infants will enable targeted follow-up and deployment of early (preventative) interventions to improve outcome. Neurocognitive outcome remains notoriously challenging using conventional models, while existing machine learning models depend on advanced MRI-derived predictors with limited potential for implementation into daily clinical practice. This study developed machine learning models for neurocognitive outcome prediction using predictors that are readily available in neonatal settings. Neurocognitive outcome prediction remains challenging due to low AUC and PPV, however, the models demonstrate high NPV, indicating potential for identifying children at low risk for adverse outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信