脂肪酸补充对偏头痛结局的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Guillermo García-Pérez-de-Sevilla, Ángel González-de-la-Flor
{"title":"脂肪酸补充对偏头痛结局的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Guillermo García-Pérez-de-Sevilla, Ángel González-de-la-Flor","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Migraines are a prevalent neurological condition that significantly impacts the quality of life. Although narrative reviews and clinical trials suggest the potential effects of fatty acid supplementation as a promising approach for migraine prophylaxis, the findings remain inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of fatty acid supplementation on migraine clinical outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using electronic databases including Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL from their inception up to October 7, 2024.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Studies meeting the PICOS criteria were included: adults diagnosed with migraine, dietary supplementation with fatty acids, assessing migraine clinical outcomes, and only randomized controlled trials. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager software. A random-effects model was applied to account for heterogeneity among studies. A standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 was interpreted as small, moderate, and large effects, respectively. Six randomized controlled trials, including 407 participants with chronic migraines, were analyzed. Interventions varied, including omega-3 supplementation with or without omega-6 restriction, lasting from 8 to 16 weeks, and 1 trial assessing alpha-lipoic acid. The overall risk of bias was assessed as low. The pooled analysis demonstrated significant reductions in headache intensity (SMD = -1.77; 95% CI: -3.32 to -0.21; P = .03), headache duration (SMD = -0.77; 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.50; P < .00001), headache frequency (SMD = -1.91; 95% CI: -2.61 to -1.21; P < .00001), and HIT-6 score (SMD = -2.44; 95% CI: -4.13 to -0.76; P = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis provides moderate evidence that fatty acid supplementation, particularly omega-3, improves migraine clinical outcomes. Additional high-quality, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings, particularly for the promising effects of alpha-lipoic acid.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024592084.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Fatty Acid Supplementation on Migraine Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Guillermo García-Pérez-de-Sevilla, Ángel González-de-la-Flor\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuae219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Migraines are a prevalent neurological condition that significantly impacts the quality of life. Although narrative reviews and clinical trials suggest the potential effects of fatty acid supplementation as a promising approach for migraine prophylaxis, the findings remain inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of fatty acid supplementation on migraine clinical outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using electronic databases including Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL from their inception up to October 7, 2024.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Studies meeting the PICOS criteria were included: adults diagnosed with migraine, dietary supplementation with fatty acids, assessing migraine clinical outcomes, and only randomized controlled trials. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager software. A random-effects model was applied to account for heterogeneity among studies. A standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 was interpreted as small, moderate, and large effects, respectively. Six randomized controlled trials, including 407 participants with chronic migraines, were analyzed. Interventions varied, including omega-3 supplementation with or without omega-6 restriction, lasting from 8 to 16 weeks, and 1 trial assessing alpha-lipoic acid. The overall risk of bias was assessed as low. The pooled analysis demonstrated significant reductions in headache intensity (SMD = -1.77; 95% CI: -3.32 to -0.21; P = .03), headache duration (SMD = -0.77; 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.50; P < .00001), headache frequency (SMD = -1.91; 95% CI: -2.61 to -1.21; P < .00001), and HIT-6 score (SMD = -2.44; 95% CI: -4.13 to -0.76; P = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis provides moderate evidence that fatty acid supplementation, particularly omega-3, improves migraine clinical outcomes. Additional high-quality, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings, particularly for the promising effects of alpha-lipoic acid.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024592084.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae219\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:偏头痛是一种普遍的神经系统疾病,严重影响生活质量。尽管叙述性评论和临床试验表明脂肪酸补充作为一种有希望的偏头痛预防方法的潜在影响,但研究结果仍不一致。目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估补充脂肪酸对偏头痛临床结局的疗效。数据来源:本系统综述和荟萃分析使用Medline、Scopus、Web of Science和CINAHL等电子数据库,从其成立至2024年10月7日。资料提取:符合PICOS标准的研究包括:诊断为偏头痛的成年人,膳食补充脂肪酸,评估偏头痛临床结果,仅随机对照试验。方法学质量和偏倚风险由2名审稿人使用Cochrane风险偏倚2工具独立评估。数据分析:使用Review Manager软件进行meta分析。随机效应模型用于解释研究间的异质性。标准化平均差异(SMD)为0.2、0.5和0.8分别被解释为小、中等和大的影响。六项随机对照试验,包括407名慢性偏头痛患者,进行了分析。干预措施多种多样,包括补充omega-3并限制或不限制omega-6,持续时间为8至16周,1项试验评估α -硫辛酸。总体偏倚风险评估为低。合并分析显示头痛强度显著降低(SMD = -1.77;95% CI: -3.32 ~ -0.21;P = .03)、头痛持续时间(SMD = -0.77;95% CI: -1.05 ~ -0.50;结论:这项荟萃分析提供了适度的证据,证明补充脂肪酸,特别是omega-3脂肪酸,可以改善偏头痛的临床结果。需要更多的高质量随机对照试验来证实这些发现,特别是α -硫辛酸的有希望的效果。系统评审注册:普洛斯彼罗注册号。CRD42024592084。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Fatty Acid Supplementation on Migraine Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Context: Migraines are a prevalent neurological condition that significantly impacts the quality of life. Although narrative reviews and clinical trials suggest the potential effects of fatty acid supplementation as a promising approach for migraine prophylaxis, the findings remain inconsistent.

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of fatty acid supplementation on migraine clinical outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using electronic databases including Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL from their inception up to October 7, 2024.

Data extraction: Studies meeting the PICOS criteria were included: adults diagnosed with migraine, dietary supplementation with fatty acids, assessing migraine clinical outcomes, and only randomized controlled trials. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.

Data analysis: Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager software. A random-effects model was applied to account for heterogeneity among studies. A standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 was interpreted as small, moderate, and large effects, respectively. Six randomized controlled trials, including 407 participants with chronic migraines, were analyzed. Interventions varied, including omega-3 supplementation with or without omega-6 restriction, lasting from 8 to 16 weeks, and 1 trial assessing alpha-lipoic acid. The overall risk of bias was assessed as low. The pooled analysis demonstrated significant reductions in headache intensity (SMD = -1.77; 95% CI: -3.32 to -0.21; P = .03), headache duration (SMD = -0.77; 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.50; P < .00001), headache frequency (SMD = -1.91; 95% CI: -2.61 to -1.21; P < .00001), and HIT-6 score (SMD = -2.44; 95% CI: -4.13 to -0.76; P = .004).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides moderate evidence that fatty acid supplementation, particularly omega-3, improves migraine clinical outcomes. Additional high-quality, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings, particularly for the promising effects of alpha-lipoic acid.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024592084.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信