添加益生元的婴儿配方奶粉对肠道微生物群、肠道环境、生长参数以及安全性和耐受性的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Maryam Kebbe, Kennedy Leung, Ben Perrett, Raylene A Reimer, Kristi Adamo, Leanne M Redman
{"title":"添加益生元的婴儿配方奶粉对肠道微生物群、肠道环境、生长参数以及安全性和耐受性的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Maryam Kebbe, Kennedy Leung, Ben Perrett, Raylene A Reimer, Kristi Adamo, Leanne M Redman","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Prebiotics are often added to infant formulas to mimic the benefits of oligosaccharides found in human milk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of prebiotic-supplemented cow's milk-based formula on the gut microbiota, gut environment, growth parameters, and safety and tolerance in infants ≤6 months old, compared with a standard formula or human milk comparator.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Searches were performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses databases. Articles were included that reported on randomized controlled trials, were published from inception until April 2024, and met prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Outcomes included gut microbiota (eg, diversity; taxa at phylum, family, genus and species levels), gut environment (eg, pH, secretory immunoglobulin A, fecal calprotectin, fecal metabolites), growth parameters (eg, z scores), and safety and tolerance. Fixed or random effects models were used and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs were calculated to assess pooled effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool (RoB 2).</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>A total of 30 articles met inclusion criteria, with 5290 infants included. Whereas effects on Lactobacillus were inconsistent, prebiotic formula supplementation increased Bifidobacterium counts (k = 7 [MD: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71]; I2 = 13%; P < .00001) and decreased fecal pH (k = 7 [MD: -0.39; 95% CI, -0.57 to -0.20]; I2 = 0%; P < .0001) compared with standard formula. Prebiotic formula supplementation increased total bacteria compared with human milk (MD: 0.41 [95% CI, 0.17-0.65]; I2 = 8%; P = .0006). In terms of growth parameters, weight-for-age z scores favored the prebiotic formula group compared with the human milk group (k = 2 [MD: 0.23; 95% CI, 0.04-0.42]; I2 = 7%; P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prebiotic supplementation in infant formula can positively alter the gut microbiota, particularly Bifidobacterium, without negative impacts on growth. Standardized, high-quality research is needed to confirm the study findings and inform guidelines for prebiotic use in infant nutrition.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021253589.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Infant Formula Supplemented With Prebiotics on the Gut Microbiome, Gut Environment, Growth Parameters, and Safety and Tolerance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Kebbe, Kennedy Leung, Ben Perrett, Raylene A Reimer, Kristi Adamo, Leanne M Redman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuae184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Prebiotics are often added to infant formulas to mimic the benefits of oligosaccharides found in human milk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of prebiotic-supplemented cow's milk-based formula on the gut microbiota, gut environment, growth parameters, and safety and tolerance in infants ≤6 months old, compared with a standard formula or human milk comparator.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Searches were performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses databases. Articles were included that reported on randomized controlled trials, were published from inception until April 2024, and met prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Outcomes included gut microbiota (eg, diversity; taxa at phylum, family, genus and species levels), gut environment (eg, pH, secretory immunoglobulin A, fecal calprotectin, fecal metabolites), growth parameters (eg, z scores), and safety and tolerance. Fixed or random effects models were used and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs were calculated to assess pooled effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool (RoB 2).</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>A total of 30 articles met inclusion criteria, with 5290 infants included. Whereas effects on Lactobacillus were inconsistent, prebiotic formula supplementation increased Bifidobacterium counts (k = 7 [MD: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71]; I2 = 13%; P < .00001) and decreased fecal pH (k = 7 [MD: -0.39; 95% CI, -0.57 to -0.20]; I2 = 0%; P < .0001) compared with standard formula. Prebiotic formula supplementation increased total bacteria compared with human milk (MD: 0.41 [95% CI, 0.17-0.65]; I2 = 8%; P = .0006). In terms of growth parameters, weight-for-age z scores favored the prebiotic formula group compared with the human milk group (k = 2 [MD: 0.23; 95% CI, 0.04-0.42]; I2 = 7%; P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prebiotic supplementation in infant formula can positively alter the gut microbiota, particularly Bifidobacterium, without negative impacts on growth. Standardized, high-quality research is needed to confirm the study findings and inform guidelines for prebiotic use in infant nutrition.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021253589.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae184\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:益生元经常被添加到婴儿配方奶粉中,以模仿母乳中发现的低聚糖的好处。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了添加益生元的牛奶配方奶粉对≤6月龄婴儿肠道菌群、肠道环境、生长参数、安全性和耐受性的影响,并与标准配方奶粉或人乳比较。数据来源:检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials和ProQuest dissertation & thesis数据库。纳入的文章报道了随机对照试验,从开始到2024年4月发表,并符合预定的纳入和排除标准。数据提取:结果包括肠道微生物群(如多样性;(门、科、属和种水平的分类群)、肠道环境(如pH、分泌免疫球蛋白A、粪便钙保护蛋白、粪便代谢物)、生长参数(如z评分)以及安全性和耐受性。采用固定或随机效应模型,计算95% ci的平均差异(md)来评估合并效应。使用Cochrane协作工具(RoB 2)评估偏倚风险。数据分析:共有30篇文章符合纳入标准,包括5290名婴儿。虽然对乳酸菌的影响不一致,但益生元配方补充剂增加了双歧杆菌计数(k = 7 [MD: 0.49;95% ci, 0.27-0.71];i2 = 13%;结论:在婴儿配方奶粉中添加益生元可以积极改变肠道微生物群,特别是双歧杆菌,而不会对生长产生负面影响。需要标准化、高质量的研究来证实研究结果,并为在婴儿营养中使用益生元提供指导。系统评审注册:普洛斯彼罗注册号。CRD42021253589。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Infant Formula Supplemented With Prebiotics on the Gut Microbiome, Gut Environment, Growth Parameters, and Safety and Tolerance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Context: Prebiotics are often added to infant formulas to mimic the benefits of oligosaccharides found in human milk.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of prebiotic-supplemented cow's milk-based formula on the gut microbiota, gut environment, growth parameters, and safety and tolerance in infants ≤6 months old, compared with a standard formula or human milk comparator.

Data sources: Searches were performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses databases. Articles were included that reported on randomized controlled trials, were published from inception until April 2024, and met prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Data extraction: Outcomes included gut microbiota (eg, diversity; taxa at phylum, family, genus and species levels), gut environment (eg, pH, secretory immunoglobulin A, fecal calprotectin, fecal metabolites), growth parameters (eg, z scores), and safety and tolerance. Fixed or random effects models were used and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs were calculated to assess pooled effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool (RoB 2).

Data analysis: A total of 30 articles met inclusion criteria, with 5290 infants included. Whereas effects on Lactobacillus were inconsistent, prebiotic formula supplementation increased Bifidobacterium counts (k = 7 [MD: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71]; I2 = 13%; P < .00001) and decreased fecal pH (k = 7 [MD: -0.39; 95% CI, -0.57 to -0.20]; I2 = 0%; P < .0001) compared with standard formula. Prebiotic formula supplementation increased total bacteria compared with human milk (MD: 0.41 [95% CI, 0.17-0.65]; I2 = 8%; P = .0006). In terms of growth parameters, weight-for-age z scores favored the prebiotic formula group compared with the human milk group (k = 2 [MD: 0.23; 95% CI, 0.04-0.42]; I2 = 7%; P = .02).

Conclusions: Prebiotic supplementation in infant formula can positively alter the gut microbiota, particularly Bifidobacterium, without negative impacts on growth. Standardized, high-quality research is needed to confirm the study findings and inform guidelines for prebiotic use in infant nutrition.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021253589.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信