基于远程软件监测补充血液透析血管通路临床监测的前瞻性评价。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nephron Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1159/000543609
Alshymaa Rafiek Eltahan, Zulfikar Pondor, Rosemary L Donne, David Lewis, Maharajan Raman, Jan Cowperthwaite, Marinela Liliana Resiga, Paul Hinchliffe, Jazzle Lim, Paula Gleave, Jonathan Allsopp, Dimitrios Poulikakos
{"title":"基于远程软件监测补充血液透析血管通路临床监测的前瞻性评价。","authors":"Alshymaa Rafiek Eltahan, Zulfikar Pondor, Rosemary L Donne, David Lewis, Maharajan Raman, Jan Cowperthwaite, Marinela Liliana Resiga, Paul Hinchliffe, Jazzle Lim, Paula Gleave, Jonathan Allsopp, Dimitrios Poulikakos","doi":"10.1159/000543609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Efficient arteriovenous access (VA) surveillance is vital for early identification of dysfunctional access, allowing timely intervention to prevent thrombosis. This study compares the efficacy of adding remote software surveillance to standard clinical care across our units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 12-month prospective study on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients using Vasc-Alert software technology to assist clinical decision-making in 2 satellite HD units (Group 1) and standard care in the remaining 3 HD units (Group 2) . Patients with Vasc-alert derived high Access Risk Score (ARS) (≥7) underwent clinical assessment and were referred for fistulogram based on relevant Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) criteria. Data on referrals for fistulogram, subsequent VA events, access abandonment, and complication-free days- extended (CFD-extended) were collected.. VA survival analysis of post-intervention primary patency rate at 3 and 6 months was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 23 (28.1%) preemptive correction of stenosis and 6 (7.3%) thrombosis episodes in Group 1, compared to 40 (19.5%)and 21 (10.2%) in Group 2 (p value 0.155, 0.587),respectively). Amongst the thrombotic episodes, 83% of cases in Group 1 had been detected during surveillance and referred for diagnostic fistulogram +/- angioplasty but developed thrombosis whilst awaiting elective intervention compared to 19% in Group 2 (P value = 0.004). Median time from fistulogram request to thrombosed VA was 26 days (IQR 21-42 days).Group 1 exhibited better post-intervention primary patency rates and longer CFD compared to Group 2 (p value < 0.001, 0.002, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating Vasc-Alert technology into VA clinical surveillance pathway was associated with improved early detection of high-risk VA, higher primary patency rates, and longer CFD-extended compared to standard of care. Improving elective interventional radiology (IR) capacity for timely intervention (< 3 weeks from referral) is crucial to materialise the benefits of enhanced surveillance in preventing acute thrombosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18998,"journal":{"name":"Nephron","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Evaluation of Remote Software Based Surveillance Supplementing Clinical Monitoring For Hemodialysis Vascular Access.\",\"authors\":\"Alshymaa Rafiek Eltahan, Zulfikar Pondor, Rosemary L Donne, David Lewis, Maharajan Raman, Jan Cowperthwaite, Marinela Liliana Resiga, Paul Hinchliffe, Jazzle Lim, Paula Gleave, Jonathan Allsopp, Dimitrios Poulikakos\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Efficient arteriovenous access (VA) surveillance is vital for early identification of dysfunctional access, allowing timely intervention to prevent thrombosis. This study compares the efficacy of adding remote software surveillance to standard clinical care across our units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 12-month prospective study on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients using Vasc-Alert software technology to assist clinical decision-making in 2 satellite HD units (Group 1) and standard care in the remaining 3 HD units (Group 2) . Patients with Vasc-alert derived high Access Risk Score (ARS) (≥7) underwent clinical assessment and were referred for fistulogram based on relevant Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) criteria. Data on referrals for fistulogram, subsequent VA events, access abandonment, and complication-free days- extended (CFD-extended) were collected.. VA survival analysis of post-intervention primary patency rate at 3 and 6 months was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 23 (28.1%) preemptive correction of stenosis and 6 (7.3%) thrombosis episodes in Group 1, compared to 40 (19.5%)and 21 (10.2%) in Group 2 (p value 0.155, 0.587),respectively). Amongst the thrombotic episodes, 83% of cases in Group 1 had been detected during surveillance and referred for diagnostic fistulogram +/- angioplasty but developed thrombosis whilst awaiting elective intervention compared to 19% in Group 2 (P value = 0.004). Median time from fistulogram request to thrombosed VA was 26 days (IQR 21-42 days).Group 1 exhibited better post-intervention primary patency rates and longer CFD compared to Group 2 (p value < 0.001, 0.002, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating Vasc-Alert technology into VA clinical surveillance pathway was associated with improved early detection of high-risk VA, higher primary patency rates, and longer CFD-extended compared to standard of care. Improving elective interventional radiology (IR) capacity for timely intervention (< 3 weeks from referral) is crucial to materialise the benefits of enhanced surveillance in preventing acute thrombosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephron\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephron\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543609\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和假设:有效的动静脉通路(VA)监测对于早期识别功能障碍通道至关重要,可以及时干预预防血栓形成。本研究比较了在我们单位的标准临床护理中增加远程软件监测的效果。方法:我们对维持性血液透析(HD)患者进行了一项为期12个月的前瞻性研究,使用Vasc-Alert软件技术协助2个卫星HD单元(组1)的临床决策,其余3个HD单元(组2)的标准治疗。Vasc-alert衍生的高准入风险评分(ARS)(≥7)的患者进行了临床评估,并根据相关的肾脏疾病结局质量倡议(KDOQI)标准进行了瘘管造影。收集了关于转诊的瘘图、随后的VA事件、放弃访问和无并发症天数延长(cfd延长)的数据。对干预后3、6个月原发性通畅率进行VA生存分析。结果:1组有23例(28.1%)先期矫治狭窄,6例(7.3%)血栓形成,2组有40例(19.5%)、21例(10.2%)(p值分别为0.155、0.587)。在血栓发作中,第1组中83%的病例在监测期间被发现,并被转诊进行诊断性瘘管造影+/-血管成形术,但在等待选择性干预期间发生血栓形成,而第2组为19% (P值= 0.004)。中位时间为26天(IQR 21-42天)。与2组相比,1组干预后原发性通畅率更高,CFD更长(p值分别< 0.001和0.002)。结论:与标准护理相比,将Vasc-Alert技术纳入VA临床监测途径可改善高危VA的早期发现,提高原发性通畅率,延长cfd延长时间。提高选择性介入放射学(IR)及时干预(转诊后< 3周)的能力对于实现加强监测预防急性血栓形成的益处至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective Evaluation of Remote Software Based Surveillance Supplementing Clinical Monitoring For Hemodialysis Vascular Access.

Background and hypothesis: Efficient arteriovenous access (VA) surveillance is vital for early identification of dysfunctional access, allowing timely intervention to prevent thrombosis. This study compares the efficacy of adding remote software surveillance to standard clinical care across our units.

Methods: We conducted a 12-month prospective study on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients using Vasc-Alert software technology to assist clinical decision-making in 2 satellite HD units (Group 1) and standard care in the remaining 3 HD units (Group 2) . Patients with Vasc-alert derived high Access Risk Score (ARS) (≥7) underwent clinical assessment and were referred for fistulogram based on relevant Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) criteria. Data on referrals for fistulogram, subsequent VA events, access abandonment, and complication-free days- extended (CFD-extended) were collected.. VA survival analysis of post-intervention primary patency rate at 3 and 6 months was conducted.

Results: There were 23 (28.1%) preemptive correction of stenosis and 6 (7.3%) thrombosis episodes in Group 1, compared to 40 (19.5%)and 21 (10.2%) in Group 2 (p value 0.155, 0.587),respectively). Amongst the thrombotic episodes, 83% of cases in Group 1 had been detected during surveillance and referred for diagnostic fistulogram +/- angioplasty but developed thrombosis whilst awaiting elective intervention compared to 19% in Group 2 (P value = 0.004). Median time from fistulogram request to thrombosed VA was 26 days (IQR 21-42 days).Group 1 exhibited better post-intervention primary patency rates and longer CFD compared to Group 2 (p value < 0.001, 0.002, respectively).

Conclusion: Incorporating Vasc-Alert technology into VA clinical surveillance pathway was associated with improved early detection of high-risk VA, higher primary patency rates, and longer CFD-extended compared to standard of care. Improving elective interventional radiology (IR) capacity for timely intervention (< 3 weeks from referral) is crucial to materialise the benefits of enhanced surveillance in preventing acute thrombosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nephron
Nephron UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ''Nephron'' comprises three sections, which are each under the editorship of internationally recognized leaders and served by specialized Associate Editors. Apart from high-quality original research, ''Nephron'' publishes invited reviews/minireviews on up-to-date topics. Papers undergo an innovative and transparent peer review process encompassing a Presentation Report which assesses and summarizes the presentation of the paper in an unbiased and standardized way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信