呼吸试验诊断肺结核的准确性:一项系统综述。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s00408-024-00779-y
Natalie Chew, Sean Yun, Kay Choong See
{"title":"呼吸试验诊断肺结核的准确性:一项系统综述。","authors":"Natalie Chew, Sean Yun, Kay Choong See","doi":"10.1007/s00408-024-00779-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) is a highly contagious infection and one of the world's leading causes of death from a single infectious agent. Currently, TB diagnosis can be established via mycobacterial cultures, Acid Fast Bacilli smear and molecular studies. In the ever-evolving landscape of medical advancements, breath tests have shown considerable promise. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breath tests to detect pulmonary TB in various populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Embase and PubMed to identify observational studies published from database inception to May 2024. All observational studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of breath tests to detect pulmonary tuberculosis were included. Authors independently reviewed each article for eligibility and risk-of-bias. A senior reviewer was consulted for discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled sensitivity for the breath test in diagnosing TB was 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.90) whilst the pooled specificity was 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.90), although heterogeneity was high. Sub-group analysis by low/lower-middle World Bank income group status, high proportion of TB in test population, or use of a separate breath sampling kit did not reduce the heterogeneity. Publication bias was absent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that pooled sensitivity and specificity of the breath tests in diagnosing pulmonary TB was high. Future research efforts can be directed towards investigating the diagnostic accuracy of electronic noses and gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry, whilst improving standardisation and reproducibility of breath test techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":18163,"journal":{"name":"Lung","volume":"203 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Breath Tests to Detect Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Chew, Sean Yun, Kay Choong See\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00408-024-00779-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) is a highly contagious infection and one of the world's leading causes of death from a single infectious agent. Currently, TB diagnosis can be established via mycobacterial cultures, Acid Fast Bacilli smear and molecular studies. In the ever-evolving landscape of medical advancements, breath tests have shown considerable promise. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breath tests to detect pulmonary TB in various populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Embase and PubMed to identify observational studies published from database inception to May 2024. All observational studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of breath tests to detect pulmonary tuberculosis were included. Authors independently reviewed each article for eligibility and risk-of-bias. A senior reviewer was consulted for discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled sensitivity for the breath test in diagnosing TB was 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.90) whilst the pooled specificity was 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.90), although heterogeneity was high. Sub-group analysis by low/lower-middle World Bank income group status, high proportion of TB in test population, or use of a separate breath sampling kit did not reduce the heterogeneity. Publication bias was absent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that pooled sensitivity and specificity of the breath tests in diagnosing pulmonary TB was high. Future research efforts can be directed towards investigating the diagnostic accuracy of electronic noses and gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry, whilst improving standardisation and reproducibility of breath test techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung\",\"volume\":\"203 1\",\"pages\":\"26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00779-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00779-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:结核病(TB)是一种高度传染性感染,是世界上单一传染性病原体导致死亡的主要原因之一。目前,结核病的诊断可以通过分枝杆菌培养、抗酸杆菌涂片和分子研究来确定。在不断发展的医学进步中,呼吸测试显示出相当大的前景。本系统综述旨在评估呼吸试验在不同人群中检测肺结核的诊断准确性。方法:本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。我们检索了Embase和PubMed,以确定从数据库建立到2024年5月发表的观察性研究。所有评估呼吸试验诊断肺结核准确性的观察性研究均纳入其中。作者独立审查了每篇文章的资格和偏倚风险。就不符之处咨询了一位资深审稿人。结果:呼气试验诊断结核病的综合敏感性为0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.90),而综合特异性为0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.90),尽管异质性很高。按世界银行低收入/中低收入群体状况、检测人群中结核病的高比例或使用单独的呼吸取样试剂盒进行的亚组分析并没有减少异质性。没有发表偏倚。结论:本研究发现呼吸试验诊断肺结核的敏感性和特异性较高。未来的研究工作可以针对调查电子鼻和气相色谱结合质谱的诊断准确性,同时提高呼吸测试技术的标准化和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Accuracy of Breath Tests to Detect Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: Tuberculosis (TB) is a highly contagious infection and one of the world's leading causes of death from a single infectious agent. Currently, TB diagnosis can be established via mycobacterial cultures, Acid Fast Bacilli smear and molecular studies. In the ever-evolving landscape of medical advancements, breath tests have shown considerable promise. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breath tests to detect pulmonary TB in various populations.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Embase and PubMed to identify observational studies published from database inception to May 2024. All observational studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of breath tests to detect pulmonary tuberculosis were included. Authors independently reviewed each article for eligibility and risk-of-bias. A senior reviewer was consulted for discrepancies.

Results: The pooled sensitivity for the breath test in diagnosing TB was 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.90) whilst the pooled specificity was 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.90), although heterogeneity was high. Sub-group analysis by low/lower-middle World Bank income group status, high proportion of TB in test population, or use of a separate breath sampling kit did not reduce the heterogeneity. Publication bias was absent.

Conclusion: Our study found that pooled sensitivity and specificity of the breath tests in diagnosing pulmonary TB was high. Future research efforts can be directed towards investigating the diagnostic accuracy of electronic noses and gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry, whilst improving standardisation and reproducibility of breath test techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lung
Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lung publishes original articles, reviews and editorials on all aspects of the healthy and diseased lungs, of the airways, and of breathing. Epidemiological, clinical, pathophysiological, biochemical, and pharmacological studies fall within the scope of the journal. Case reports, short communications and technical notes can be accepted if they are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信