Jessica M Judd, Dylan N Peay, Jinah L Kim, Elliot A Smith, Megan E Donnay, Joel Miller, Jean-Paul Klein, Erin K Nagy, Amanda M Acuña, M Foster Olive, Cheryl D Conrad
{"title":"慢性应激后恢复期抑制前额叶谷氨酸神经元活动破坏雄性大鼠恐惧记忆:边缘下皮层的潜在作用。","authors":"Jessica M Judd, Dylan N Peay, Jinah L Kim, Elliot A Smith, Megan E Donnay, Joel Miller, Jean-Paul Klein, Erin K Nagy, Amanda M Acuña, M Foster Olive, Cheryl D Conrad","doi":"10.1101/lm.053957.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic stress typically leads to deficits in fear extinction. However, when a delay occurs from the end of chronic stress and the start of fear conditioning (a \"recovery\"), rats show improved context-cue discrimination, compared to recently stressed rats or nonstressed rats. The infralimbic cortex (IL) is important for fear extinction and undergoes neuronal remodeling after chronic stress ends, which could drive improved context-cue discrimination. Here, glutamatergic IL neurons of Sprague-Dawley male rats were targeted for inhibition using inhibitory designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) and daily injections of clozapine N-oxide (CNO) during a 21-day recovery period from chronic stress. Histological verification confirmed DREADDs in the IL with some spread to nearby medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions. CNO administration was then discontinued before fear conditioning started and behavioral testing thereafter so that behavioral assessments occurred without neuronal inhibition. Fear conditioning involved presenting male rats with three tone-foot shock pairings on 1 day, which was followed by 2 days of 15 tone-alone extinction sessions. Daily and repeated inhibition of mainly IL neurons during the 21-day recovery period did not disrupt fear learning or fear extinction in all groups (controls, stressed rats without a recovery, and stressed rats with a recovery). However, chronically stressed rats given a recovery and with DREADD activation showed impaired spontaneous recovery, indicating a failure to form a tone-foot shock association. The findings show that daily inhibition of mainly IL neurons prior to fear conditioning and extinction depends upon the changes that occur during the recovery period following the end of chronic stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":18003,"journal":{"name":"Learning & memory","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhibition of prefrontal glutamatergic neuron activity during the recovery period following chronic stress disrupts fear memory in male rats: potential role of the infralimbic cortex.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica M Judd, Dylan N Peay, Jinah L Kim, Elliot A Smith, Megan E Donnay, Joel Miller, Jean-Paul Klein, Erin K Nagy, Amanda M Acuña, M Foster Olive, Cheryl D Conrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/lm.053957.124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic stress typically leads to deficits in fear extinction. However, when a delay occurs from the end of chronic stress and the start of fear conditioning (a \\\"recovery\\\"), rats show improved context-cue discrimination, compared to recently stressed rats or nonstressed rats. The infralimbic cortex (IL) is important for fear extinction and undergoes neuronal remodeling after chronic stress ends, which could drive improved context-cue discrimination. Here, glutamatergic IL neurons of Sprague-Dawley male rats were targeted for inhibition using inhibitory designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) and daily injections of clozapine N-oxide (CNO) during a 21-day recovery period from chronic stress. Histological verification confirmed DREADDs in the IL with some spread to nearby medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions. CNO administration was then discontinued before fear conditioning started and behavioral testing thereafter so that behavioral assessments occurred without neuronal inhibition. Fear conditioning involved presenting male rats with three tone-foot shock pairings on 1 day, which was followed by 2 days of 15 tone-alone extinction sessions. Daily and repeated inhibition of mainly IL neurons during the 21-day recovery period did not disrupt fear learning or fear extinction in all groups (controls, stressed rats without a recovery, and stressed rats with a recovery). However, chronically stressed rats given a recovery and with DREADD activation showed impaired spontaneous recovery, indicating a failure to form a tone-foot shock association. The findings show that daily inhibition of mainly IL neurons prior to fear conditioning and extinction depends upon the changes that occur during the recovery period following the end of chronic stress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning & memory\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning & memory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053957.124\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & memory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053957.124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inhibition of prefrontal glutamatergic neuron activity during the recovery period following chronic stress disrupts fear memory in male rats: potential role of the infralimbic cortex.
Chronic stress typically leads to deficits in fear extinction. However, when a delay occurs from the end of chronic stress and the start of fear conditioning (a "recovery"), rats show improved context-cue discrimination, compared to recently stressed rats or nonstressed rats. The infralimbic cortex (IL) is important for fear extinction and undergoes neuronal remodeling after chronic stress ends, which could drive improved context-cue discrimination. Here, glutamatergic IL neurons of Sprague-Dawley male rats were targeted for inhibition using inhibitory designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) and daily injections of clozapine N-oxide (CNO) during a 21-day recovery period from chronic stress. Histological verification confirmed DREADDs in the IL with some spread to nearby medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions. CNO administration was then discontinued before fear conditioning started and behavioral testing thereafter so that behavioral assessments occurred without neuronal inhibition. Fear conditioning involved presenting male rats with three tone-foot shock pairings on 1 day, which was followed by 2 days of 15 tone-alone extinction sessions. Daily and repeated inhibition of mainly IL neurons during the 21-day recovery period did not disrupt fear learning or fear extinction in all groups (controls, stressed rats without a recovery, and stressed rats with a recovery). However, chronically stressed rats given a recovery and with DREADD activation showed impaired spontaneous recovery, indicating a failure to form a tone-foot shock association. The findings show that daily inhibition of mainly IL neurons prior to fear conditioning and extinction depends upon the changes that occur during the recovery period following the end of chronic stress.
期刊介绍:
The neurobiology of learning and memory is entering a new interdisciplinary era. Advances in neuropsychology have identified regions of brain tissue that are critical for certain types of function. Electrophysiological techniques have revealed behavioral correlates of neuronal activity. Studies of synaptic plasticity suggest that some mechanisms of memory formation may resemble those of neural development. And molecular approaches have identified genes with patterns of expression that influence behavior. It is clear that future progress depends on interdisciplinary investigations. The current literature of learning and memory is large but fragmented. Until now, there has been no single journal devoted to this area of study and no dominant journal that demands attention by serious workers in the area, regardless of specialty. Learning & Memory provides a forum for these investigations in the form of research papers and review articles.