使用远程平台检测电子尼古丁传递系统(ENDS)线索反应性:双使用者的香烟和ENDS欲望。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Krista Miloslavich, Emma I Brett, Daniel J Fridberg, Andrea C King
{"title":"使用远程平台检测电子尼古丁传递系统(ENDS)线索反应性:双使用者的香烟和ENDS欲望。","authors":"Krista Miloslavich, Emma I Brett, Daniel J Fridberg, Andrea C King","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prior research shows that in-person exposure to electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use increases desire for cigarettes and ENDS. However, less is known about the impact of cues delivered during remote interactions. This study extends previous in-person cue work by leveraging a remote confederate-delivered cue-delivery paradigm to evaluate the impact of dual nicotine vaping (vs. sole smoking) on reactivity to an ENDS cue in individuals who smoke cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N=52 dual users (DU; current users of both combustible cigarettes and ENDS) and N=54 sole smokers (SS; users of combustible cigarettes only) observed a study confederate drinking bottled water (control cue) and then vaping an ENDS (active cue). Changes in desire for cigarettes and ENDS were compared between groups post-cue exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multilevel models, controlling for sex and cigarettes per day, revealed that the remote ENDS cue, but not water, significantly increased desire for both cigarettes and ENDS. Relative to SS, DU reported greater post-ENDS cue increases in ENDS desire but not cigarette desire.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A remote, confederate-delivered ENDS cue generalizes as a smoking and vaping cue, with DU showing greater reactivity than SS. This study provides the first evidence for the validity and feasibility of a remote, confederate-delivered ENDS cue reactivity paradigm.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study provides support for the use of a remote platform, an increasingly popular method of conducting research since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, to employ confederate-delivered ENDS cues. Frequent observations of vaping via remote platforms and social media may contribute to the maintenance of single and dual product use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) Cue Reactivity Using a Remote Platform: Cigarette and ENDS Desire in Dual Users.\",\"authors\":\"Krista Miloslavich, Emma I Brett, Daniel J Fridberg, Andrea C King\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prior research shows that in-person exposure to electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use increases desire for cigarettes and ENDS. However, less is known about the impact of cues delivered during remote interactions. This study extends previous in-person cue work by leveraging a remote confederate-delivered cue-delivery paradigm to evaluate the impact of dual nicotine vaping (vs. sole smoking) on reactivity to an ENDS cue in individuals who smoke cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N=52 dual users (DU; current users of both combustible cigarettes and ENDS) and N=54 sole smokers (SS; users of combustible cigarettes only) observed a study confederate drinking bottled water (control cue) and then vaping an ENDS (active cue). Changes in desire for cigarettes and ENDS were compared between groups post-cue exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multilevel models, controlling for sex and cigarettes per day, revealed that the remote ENDS cue, but not water, significantly increased desire for both cigarettes and ENDS. Relative to SS, DU reported greater post-ENDS cue increases in ENDS desire but not cigarette desire.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A remote, confederate-delivered ENDS cue generalizes as a smoking and vaping cue, with DU showing greater reactivity than SS. This study provides the first evidence for the validity and feasibility of a remote, confederate-delivered ENDS cue reactivity paradigm.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study provides support for the use of a remote platform, an increasingly popular method of conducting research since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, to employ confederate-delivered ENDS cues. Frequent observations of vaping via remote platforms and social media may contribute to the maintenance of single and dual product use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,直接接触电子尼古丁传递系统(ENDS)会增加对香烟和ENDS的渴望。然而,在远程交互过程中传递的线索的影响知之甚少。本研究扩展了之前的现场提示工作,利用远程联盟传递的提示传递范式来评估双重尼古丁电子烟(与单一吸烟相比)对吸烟者对ENDS提示的反应性的影响。方法:双用户(DU;可燃卷烟和ENDS的当前使用者)和N=54名单一吸烟者(SS;只抽可燃香烟的人)观察了一项研究,参与者喝瓶装水(对照线索),然后抽ENDS(主动线索)。在线索暴露后,比较各组对香烟和ENDS的欲望变化。结果:控制了性和每天吸烟的多水平模型显示,远程ENDS提示,而不是水,显著增加了对香烟和ENDS的欲望。与SS相比,DU报告了ENDS提示后更大的ENDS欲望增加,但香烟欲望没有增加。结论:一个远程、同伙传递的ENDS线索概括为吸烟和电子烟线索,其中DU比SS表现出更大的反应性。本研究为远程、同伙传递的ENDS线索反应性范式的有效性和可行性提供了第一个证据。含义:本研究为使用远程平台提供支持,远程平台是自COVID-19大流行爆发以来日益流行的一种进行研究的方法,使用联盟交付的ENDS线索。通过远程平台和社交媒体频繁观察电子烟可能有助于维持单一和双重产品的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) Cue Reactivity Using a Remote Platform: Cigarette and ENDS Desire in Dual Users.

Introduction: Prior research shows that in-person exposure to electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use increases desire for cigarettes and ENDS. However, less is known about the impact of cues delivered during remote interactions. This study extends previous in-person cue work by leveraging a remote confederate-delivered cue-delivery paradigm to evaluate the impact of dual nicotine vaping (vs. sole smoking) on reactivity to an ENDS cue in individuals who smoke cigarettes.

Methods: N=52 dual users (DU; current users of both combustible cigarettes and ENDS) and N=54 sole smokers (SS; users of combustible cigarettes only) observed a study confederate drinking bottled water (control cue) and then vaping an ENDS (active cue). Changes in desire for cigarettes and ENDS were compared between groups post-cue exposure.

Results: Multilevel models, controlling for sex and cigarettes per day, revealed that the remote ENDS cue, but not water, significantly increased desire for both cigarettes and ENDS. Relative to SS, DU reported greater post-ENDS cue increases in ENDS desire but not cigarette desire.

Conclusions: A remote, confederate-delivered ENDS cue generalizes as a smoking and vaping cue, with DU showing greater reactivity than SS. This study provides the first evidence for the validity and feasibility of a remote, confederate-delivered ENDS cue reactivity paradigm.

Implications: This study provides support for the use of a remote platform, an increasingly popular method of conducting research since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, to employ confederate-delivered ENDS cues. Frequent observations of vaping via remote platforms and social media may contribute to the maintenance of single and dual product use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信